i still consider the x58 a better investment because of core i9
DFI P965-S/core 2 quad q6600@3.2ghz/4gb gskill ddr2 @ 800mhz cas 4/xfx gtx 260/ silverstone op650/thermaltake xaser 3 case/razer lachesis
Then this is not the forum for you then. this forum has well respected world champion overclockers, that's why they come here.
+1
it definitely looks more like a l2 bottleneck than a x58 PCI-e bottleneck when there are gaming benchmarks around where at low resolutions i7>p2>c2 and as resolution is increased c2>p2>i7maybe GPU bound situations require larger amounts of data to be transferred to the GPU with the CPU cache acting as a buffer? just speculating, because i7 owns low res. it seems unlikely that intel would screw up their PCI-e controller, or their x58 chipset, but i always thought 256k l2 was skinny
Last edited by hollo; 08-19-2009 at 06:38 PM.
nicely done reviews
Edit: I should read the thread first!
Seems like the i5 750 could be the bang-for-buck champ for those that don't require HT.
Last edited by twwen2; 08-19-2009 at 08:54 PM.
So for you what's the purpose of the platform then? To please anxious people with "beta" products and act as a market and perfomance test platform?
What do I have to say about something that becomes slower and replaced with something faster with time? I think that's obvious, but it's not the case here...
Nobody knows yet, SB and BD should be all about serious core enhancements. No point in upgrading otherwise.
In XS we can talk about the 99% of other people, the ones that give Intel money, you know.
Last edited by STaRGaZeR; 08-20-2009 at 06:42 AM.
Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)
So besides the cost and power consumption, X58 is still a better long-term investment? And that's why I decided to upgrade to the Core i7 920 instead of waiting for Core i5.
CPU: Core i7-2600K@4.8Ghz Mobo: Asus Sabertooth P67 Case: Corsair 700D w/ 800D window
CPU Cooler: Corsair H70 w/ 2 GTs AP-15 GPU: 2xGigabyte GTX 670 WindForce OC SLI
RAM: 2x8GB G.Skill Ripjaws PSU: Corsair AX850W Sound card: Asus Xonar DX + Fiio E9
HDD: Crucial M4 128GB + 4TB HDD Display: 3x30" Dell UltraSharp 3007WFP-HC
Speakers: Logitech Z-5500 Headphone: Sennheiser HD650
1. 3DMark Vantage
core i7 920
Core i5 750
Core 2 Quad 9450 @ 9550
2. 3DMark06
Core i7 920
Core i5 750
Core 2 Quad 9450 @ 9550
3. Cinebench R10
Core i7 920
Core i5 750
Core 2 Quad 9450 @ 9550
GTA 4 SETTING
Core i7 920
Core i5 750
Core 2 Quad 9450 @ 9550
Benchmark 1 RE5 All HIGH, AA=4X
Core i7 920
Core i5 750
Core 2 Quad 9450 @ 9550
Benchmark 2 RE5 All HIGH, AA=4X
Core i7 920
Core i5 750
Core 2 Quad 9450 @ 9550
Source : http://forum.amtech.com.vn/reviews-z...-va-q9550.html
Last edited by bakalu; 08-20-2009 at 11:52 PM.
hmm i think the 750 may be a better option for my home server than the originally planned 860
Gaming Box:: q6600 @3.0 :: 9800gtx :: Abit IP35 :: 4gb :: 1.4TB :: akasa eclipse :: Win7
Development:: PhenomII 955BE @3.2 :: 4200 :: asus M4A785 M Evo :: 1.25TB ::Win7
Media Centre :: q6600 @3.0 :: x1950pro :: asus p35 epu :: 8gb :: 320 GB :: Lc17B :: Win7
server:: I7 860 :: p55 gd65 :: 3450 :: 8 TB :: 8gb :: Rebel 12 :: server 2008 R2
Just wondering what you plan to do with your server that requires that kind of CPU power? Most commerical home servers (like from HP) only come with a Celeron (usually around 2GHz). For run file sharing and backup that should be more than enough. Are you going to use it for something more than this?
Core i5 750 & i7 870 Review
http://www.chiphell.com/2009/0906/102.html
Translated
Its a bit ignorant to say that. It would be stupid to do tri or quad sli on P55. We don't even know how future SLI / CF configs will perform on x8 in dual configs yet let alone tri / quad. That said, those of us who want to go nuts with these types of configs are clearly going to gravitate towards x58. Now again I'm not saying this makes everyone need it, its still a niche but there is still a demand and practical use for it regardless of your stance on it.
However if you don't plan on doing multiple gpus ever, now that P55 is out, I see no reason for going x58 as a gamer.
Feedanator 7.0
CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i
Intel 'Lynnfield' Core i5 750 and Core i7 870 Performance Testing
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/290...ing/index.html
Intel Core i5 and Core i7: Lynnfield CPUs Reviewed
http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,6...iewed/Reviews/
Core i5 750 - Core i7 860 and 870 Processor Review
http://www.guru3d.com/article/core-i...r-review-test/
Intel Lynnfield Core i5 750, Core i7 860 and Core i7 870 CPU Review
http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=19979
Core i5 750, Core i7 860 and Core i7 870 CPU Review
http://www.legionhardware.com/document.php?id=855
Intel Core i5 750 & i7 870 Review
http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Ha...ews/lynnfield/
Intel Lynnfield Core i7-870 and Core i5-750 Processor Review
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=776
Intel Lynnfield Core i5 and Core i7 Processors
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2009/..._i7_processors
In Theory: How Does Lynnfield's On-Die PCI Express Affect Gaming?
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...ield,2379.html
Intel's Core i7 870 & i5 750, Lynnfield: Harder, Better, Faster Stronger
http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3634
Last edited by onethreehill; 09-07-2009 at 08:15 PM.
Bookmarks