Cinebench R10 32/64 bit challenge AIR/watter here :)

[FlanK3r]

Zeus, its good score for 32 bit, all more than 13 000 in 32 bit is very great, but higher scores are in x64 . U can try it (16 000 is super and more)

[Daveburt714]

davebart
very cool! But u are second with AIRcooling and one x4 CPU
watch this:

from overcloknet, overcloker WaLshy11: 17 187points !!!

Sure... anybody could do it with a 955...

Just kidding, that's pretty impressive! Looks like the only real difference was his memory clocks, not sure my ram can do that but next time I get bored I may try and crank the ram to see if I can break 17k.

[chew*]

Lets see what you 64 bit guys got

[richierich]

Only 18k chew? I thought you can do better.....

lol nice benchmarks man!

My 550 --> X4 can't even run Cinebench 64-bit stable at anything over 3.79GHz.

[FlanK3r]

hehe, good, but LN2, right? Next u can try x64 AIR or water, record is now 17 187 with AIR and with X4 Phenom (retail)

[richierich]

Finally hit 16k! Ambient temps are a lot lower today, about 20 degrees Celsius. Also overclocked my NB + RAM significantly higher:

[FlanK3r]

good work, il try tomorow.

[jcool]

Guys, try running the test repeatedly for better scores. You can gain about 500-1000 points compared to the first run

[theoldtimer]

I can’t run with chew but here is my 32-bit result.

Asus M3A79-t Deluxe liquid cooling

[flowtek]

64bit first run, 2600NB



flo

[equinox1]

17019

cpu at 3959
nb at 2996
ht at 2140
bus at 214
on chilled water
w7 64 bit
should be able to get more but i ran out of ice.

[FlanK3r]

impressive, how was yourt setings and cooling?

[equinox1]

impressive, how was yourt setings and cooling?

updated previous post,saved it wrong so its hard to read

[crazydiamond]

are those the AMD ocz kit? gold or plat?

[Daveburt714]

Well... I got bored tonight and decided to try and tweak this a little further..

To be fair, I'm on water and I turned off all the unimportant services, but I finally broke 17k (even beat your guy FlanK3r)..

I tried cranking the memory, it's rated at 1600, but I couldn't get those clocks with decent timings, so I just pushed as hard as I could with tight timings...



Not too shabby! I'm really happy with this 550, I get the feeling the 965's are gonna rock... Just what I need, another processor (evil Grin)...

[FlanK3r]

oMG....very nice score, the best with watter Daveburt

The best of the best to time in x64:

1)extreme cooling (DICE, LN2 etc):- Chew* 18 704 points

2)watter: - Daveburt714 17 255 points

3)only AIR: - WaLshy11: 17 187points

[Lightman]

Great work guys!

17K + is really nice! Now just render some nice animations on that settings and show them to us

[Mechromancer]

These are my scores since I got my Phenom II in January. Most are on the 0905 BIOS on this M3A79-T Deluxe motherboard, but two are with the new 1102 BIOS and Catalyst 9.7 drivers. My CPU is clocked at 3.2Ghz Core/2.4Ghz Northbridge for all tests. Also, I have a brief description of the Hyper Transport options I had enabled or disabled. From those tests I can conclude that with this motherboard, the 905 BIOS, Catalyst 9.7 drivers, and ram with a high clock and low timings will have the highest performance for this particular setup. My OpenGL scores blow all of you away with this stock clocked HD4970 .

[Lightman]

These are my scores since I got my Phenom II in January. Most are on the 0905 BIOS on this M3A79-T Deluxe motherboard, but two are with the new 1102 BIOS and Catalyst 9.7 drivers. My CPU is clocked at 3.2Ghz Core/2.4Ghz Northbridge for all tests. Also, I have a brief description of the Hyper Transport options I had enabled or disabled. From those tests I can conclude that with this motherboard, the 905 BIOS, Catalyst 9.7 drivers, and ram with a high clock and low timings will have the highest performance for this particular setup. My OpenGL scores blow all of you away with this stock clocked HD4970 .

Very nice comparison at the same CPU freq.!
But look at the first page for my OGL scores. I've beat you with my CF (which doesn't do much for C4D) and underclocked cards.
Anyway, Cat.9.7 seems to give nice performance in OGL. and your scores are excellent with that CPU freq.

[Mechromancer]

Very nice comparison at the same CPU freq.!
But look at the first page for my OGL scores. I've beat you with my CF (which doesn't do much for C4D) and underclocked cards.
Anyway, Cat.9.7 seems to give nice performance in OGL. and your scores are excellent with that CPU freq.

You beat my OpenGL score by 3 full points with a Crossfire setup!

One thing is for certain, Cat 9.7 has revived ATI OpenGL! I'm hoping we get a little rain in my area today in Houston so I can turn the A/C on, get the house really cold, and overclock to 3.7 or 3.8Ghz today. I'll add a little FSB to bring my 1066 DDR2 that I run at 800 to ~1000 at 4-5-5-15 timings.

[Lightman]

You beat my OpenGL score by 3 full points with a Crossfire setup!

One thing is for certain, Cat 9.7 has revived ATI OpenGL! I'm hoping we get a little rain in my area today in Houston so I can turn the A/C on, get the house really cold, and overclock to 3.7 or 3.8Ghz today. I'll add a little FSB to bring my 1066 DDR2 that I run at 800 to ~1000 at 4-5-5-15 timings.

Sounds good to me

[theoldtimer]

I improved my score a little. I may try 64 bit next.

[BeepBeep2]

What's the highest score for a non Phenom or Phenom II chip? I can push about 6000, not bad for what I've got.

[beta]

xp 64bit

[FlanK3r]

the oldtimer: very nice and how was cooling?