In order for you to be competitive in the 9.xx category you have to pull out a 9m58sec or a 9m59sec run
In order for you to be competitive in the 9.xx category you have to pull out a 9m58sec or a 9m59sec run
@George_o/c: thanks for that. Will try again.....In order for you to be competitive in the 9.xx category you have to pull out a 9m58sec or a 9m59sec run
Not a tuned run but.......looks like there is a new contender on the AMD side of things.
heatware chew*
For every beginning there must be an end
Will be around to help with AMD specific hardware till shortly after BD launches, after that I'm Ghost
wow that beats 4g amd runs @ oca forums contest
you da pi-man!
**edit
igpu or separate gpu?
Last edited by Hondacity; 08-12-2011 at 07:51 PM.
Haven't tested board non APU yet.
There's quite a bit of room in that score as well.
heatware chew*
For every beginning there must be an end
Will be around to help with AMD specific hardware till shortly after BD launches, after that I'm Ghost
Good enough for 11.xx category? I'm not too impressed by oc-ability of these new processorsOriginally Posted by chew*
Overclocking, it's a lifestyle
I'd say up to 13X for sure, 12X is questionable.
heatware chew*
For every beginning there must be an end
Will be around to help with AMD specific hardware till shortly after BD launches, after that I'm Ghost
Yes I realized 11.x was too high a demand. Nice to see Llano efficiency so good without L3-cache though.
Overclocking, it's a lifestyle
Alright, better late than never. Finally got to play with rex, it's a godly board
12.xx
3257.8......Calathea.......12.59.062s.......6x543. 0......905.0mhz.....6-6-5-18....3/5..X48
Overclocking, it's a lifestyle
hypers are the gifts of gods
nice work cal
Just wait til I get 'em cold
Overclocking, it's a lifestyle
Random result on mem testing, therefore not very good but gains me hopefully a visitiors place in the list
7.xx
4067.7......websmile.......7.59.469s.......38x 107.0......1142.0mhz.....7-9-7-24....1:8..Z68
11.xx (45nm/i7)
2808.8......cheapseats.........11.59.953....16x176 ....1053mhz.....6-7-5-20....2/12..X58
XP sp2 / LSC on / core 1 affinity / realtime / explorer closed / 512-512 page file /
2 disks / 3 partition / maxmem 680 / SpiTweaker v1.0 CDT (680MB file)
RTL 54/57/58
Maximus V GENE [0086] :: 3770K L212B244 :: H70 :: EB3103A (PSC)
CL|WCL|RTL performance (SB) : 32M scaling charts : PSC WCL > CL performance bug
9.xx (45nm/i7)
3408.3......cheapseats..........9.59.953....17x201 ....1002mhz.....6-7-5-19....2/10..X58
XP sp2 / LSC on / core 1 affinity / realtime / explorer closed / 512-512 page file /
2 disks / 3 partition / maxmem 680 / SpiTweaker v1.0 CDT (680MB file)
6x2GB
tip: tWTW_sr 6 > 975mhz
RTL 56/59/61
Maximus V GENE [0086] :: 3770K L212B244 :: H70 :: EB3103A (PSC)
CL|WCL|RTL performance (SB) : 32M scaling charts : PSC WCL > CL performance bug
7.xx (45nm/i7)
4329.0......cheapseats..........7.59.797....20x217 ....1082mhz.....6-7-5-20....2/10..X58
XP sp2 / LSC on / core 1 affinity / realtime / explorer closed / 512-512 page file /
2 disks / 3 partition / maxmem 680 / SpiTweaker v1.0 CDT (680MB file)
RTL 51/53/55
Maximus V GENE [0086] :: 3770K L212B244 :: H70 :: EB3103A (PSC)
CL|WCL|RTL performance (SB) : 32M scaling charts : PSC WCL > CL performance bug
Ram at 1082Mhz... cl6?? I like the 12GB action too, that is seriously extreme!
About time someone posted in this thread, why no Sandy Bridge yet?
Overclocking, it's a lifestyle
Haven't benched 32M for like a year, but you know how it is... Old habbits die hard
So, I fired up the Llano today and managed to get a proper run after 3 hours of testing. There is still room for improvement, on the OS side of things.
I used Kingston 4GB 2133MHz HyperX Grey Series RAM (9-11-9)
Also, sorry but neither CPU Tweaker nor Memset worked, thus I can't display the subtimings.
Last edited by George_o/c; 03-24-2012 at 03:13 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
