Super Pi 32M Low Clock Challenge

[cheapseats]

@Hyperhorn please ignore for update

Wow you are really pushing it Nick, keep up the good job
What about your T3eH8 ? Won't you show it some SPi 32M love ?

cheers George but DFI did not love 32M

*updated sig*

these were my results on DFI, but there wasn't B2B in memset while i had it.
i need to run classified ~ B2B 10-11 to slow down to this level (same OS).

classified results to follow

8.xx




7.xx

Hey cheap, i see you're giving the Rampage Extreme another spin mate? It seems to play nice with the blades, doesn't it?

I've got me a Rampage Extreme again (expecting it to arrive this week), it was too much fun to miss out on.

Needless to say i will give 32M another whirl.

Hi mate i did the 10.xx run a while back, but i had quite a long gap between
X58 boards. Blades were great in RE (but not for 9.xx )
RE + Blades
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=230023

What memory this time ?

[cheapseats]

10.xx (45nm/i7)

3097.3......cheapseats.........10.58.250....15x207 ....1032mhz.....7-7-5-20....2/10..X58


XP sp2 / LSC on / core 1 affinity / realtime / explorer closed / 512-512 page file /
1 disk / 2 partition / maxmem 680 / SpiTweaker v1.0 CDT (680MB file) D>C (SPi C)

[cheapseats]

@Hyperhorn (EDIT 30 Oct: please ignore this run for update, thanks )

9.xx (45nm/i7)

3425.5......cheapseats..........9.59.703....17x202 ....1008mhz.....7-7-5-20....2/10..X58


XP sp2 / LSC on / core 1 affinity / realtime / explorer closed / 512-512 page file /
1 disk / 2 partition / maxmem 680 / SpiTweaker v1.0 CDT (680MB file) D>C (SPi C)

[cheapseats]

8.xx (45nm/i7)

3833.5......cheapseats..........8.59.891....21x183 ....1095mhz.....7-8-7-20....2/12..X58


XP sp2 / LSC on / core 1 affinity / realtime / explorer closed / 512-512 page file /
1 disk / 2 partition / maxmem 680 / SpiTweaker v1.0 CDT (680MB file) D>C (SPi C)

[cheapseats]

7.xx (45nm/i7)

4356.9......cheapseats..........7.59.375....21x208 ....1037mhz.....7-7-5-20....2/10..X58


XP sp2 / LSC on / core 1 affinity / realtime / explorer closed / 512-512 page file /
1 disk / 2 partition / maxmem 680 / SpiTweaker v1.0 CDT (680MB file) D>C (SPi C)

[Zeus]

Hi mate i did the 10.xx run a while back, but i had quite a long gap between
X58 boards. Blades were great in RE (but not for 9.xx )
RE + Blades
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=230023

What memory this time ?

I managed to track 2x1GB sticks of CSX Diablo with GTR chips down.

Just like "back then".

Cpu will be another Q822A435, can you say deja vu?

[Hyperhorn]

*Updated up to #73*

1/ Thank you all for your patience - don`t worry, I didn`t forget our 32M competition.

2/ Unfortunately several results don`t match to the rules, which are applicable after July, 31th:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=46: No CPU-Tweaker
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=47: No CPU-Tweaker
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=49: Pi window with loops covered, no CPU-Z/Mem
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=59: No CPU-Tweaker
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=63: No CPU-Tweaker

humph...

3/ Do you agree with DJSUB - shall I delete older scores, when an user posts an update score within a time zone with the same CPU type?

Pro:
-More clarity, more compact lists and better overiew

Contra:
-Less results for comparison, you can`t study the update history of an user anymore

[jcmarfilph]

way to go Alex_TPC

Pinoy Powah... =D

[George_o/c]

3/ Do you agree with DJSUB - shall I delete older scores, when an user posts an update score within a time zone with the same CPU type?

That's the way to go Only the best score

[K404]

YALDI!!!!!! This has taken me so long

E8600 @ 3598MHz......K404..... 11M 58.984.......599.8x6.......959.6MHz... 7-6-6 PL9.... Asus X48 Evolution



Massive thanks to OPB and Monteboy for CDT-IV and batch processing for it... and also to everyone who beats my scores at the same MHz

[kintaro]

*Updated up to #73*

1/ Thank you all for your patience - don`t worry, I didn`t forget our 32M competition.

2/ Unfortunately several results don`t match to the rules, which are applicable after July, 31th:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=46: No CPU-Tweaker
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=47: No CPU-Tweaker
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=49: Pi window with loops covered, no CPU-Z/Mem
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=59: No CPU-Tweaker
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=63: No CPU-Tweaker

humph...

3/ Do you agree with DJSUB - shall I delete older scores, when an user posts an update score within a time zone with the same CPU type?

Pro:
-More clarity, more compact lists and better overiew

Contra:
-Less results for comparison, you can`t study the update history of an user anymore

is there something wrong with my entry at
55#8xx
56#9xx
57#11xx
because they don't get any rankings since you update up to 73#?

[subaruwrc]

Hello!
If the screen is acceptable, here is a result of 12.xx time zone.


3374mhz @ E8600 12M 57 sec 482*7 ---- 771mhz 6-5-4-14 PL7 Asus Rampage Extreme
Thanks.

[kintaro]

10.xx

Intel I7 920 @ 3179.6MHz ........ kintaro.......... 10.59.844 .... 15x212 .... 847.9MHz .... 7-6-6-18....2:8...... X58

new mobo.

[subaruwrc]

Hello
another result from me.
9.XX time zone
Intel E8600 @ 4680mhz -------- subaruwrc--------- 9.59.157-------10*468mhz-------- 748mhz---------- 6-5-4-14 pl7 --------5:8-----------X48

thanks.

[dread77]

Intel I7 950 @ 3442.2MHz ........ dread77 .......... 09.58.765 .... 17x202.5 .... 1012.4MHz .... 7-7-5-20....2:10...... X58

[TONY GAL]

i7 950
8x,9x,10x,11x

[cheapseats]

9.xx (45nm/i7)

3415.2......cheapseats..........9.59.859....16x214 ....1067mhz.....7-7-6-20....2/10..X58


XP sp2 / LSC on / core 1 affinity / realtime / explorer closed / 512-512 page file /
1 disk / 2 partition / maxmem 680 / SpiTweaker v1.0 CDT (680MB file) D>C (SPi C)

RTL 55-57-59

[Zeus]

I'm trying to get back into 32M benching but i seem to fail, like i lost my touch...

Still managed to better my best sub 12 minutes but still not fast enough:



I will practice some more and try to hit back.

Rampage Extreme FTW!!

[TONY GAL]

update 7x 10x
i7 950 7xxx....209,5x21....4398,7....7,58,875.......1047. .cl7-8-7-20.evga E760...x58
i7 950 10x....207,5x15....3112,1....10,59,187.....1037cl7-8-7-20.....evga E760...x58

[Zeus]

This one took forever getting a good run that finished, everytime it went nice and fast it just errored. (not exact in round)

Then i got a 10.00.047 finish and after that i got a 10.00.000 finish.

I was determined to get that sub 10 at 633FSB and succeeded when i was about to give up.



I'm well impressed by this Rampage Extreme.

[Hyperhorn]

Great scores guys, Super Pi rocks!

*Updated up to #87*
I deleted all duplicate scores now. If you still find some, give me a hint please. Same goes for a score I might have deleted, but is in fact no duplicate. (Therefore I saved a copy of the old full list on my HDD - you never know...) Plus I added kintaro`s scores I had skipped accidentally.

[subaruwrc]

THX for the update but is something wrong with my 9.59 score? It is in the post *89. thx

[TONY GAL]

goodmorning from greece!
but my own all scores dont update in first page anywhere

[dinos22]

you do realise that whatever people do on forums is strictly voluntary



chillax a bit man

[Zeus]

Not a very good efficiency but managed to pull off a sub 9 minutes:



I don't know what is wrong, i just can't touch the efficiency of others here.

Maybe i have to kill some services?

More tweaking ahead.