Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 126 to 150 of 167

Thread: Intel to discontinue Core i7 920 & 940 CPUs

  1. #126
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    425
    this news is for me coherent with intel policy, they are going to put i5 on the market, and by then i920 and 940 will be almost a year old.
    To justify the difference in price between the two platforms, they will remove 920 and 940 and put in somthing like 930 and 950 (this one confirmed)
    to have a coherent price scale.

    hence high range i5 should be close to i920 in performance...
    Core i7 2700k@4,8ghz HT off- 1.41v / Gainward GTX580 GooD 850/1700/2200 / 2X4Gb G.Skill Ares 1833C9 / Z77 Sabertooth / Crucial M4 64 Gb / WD 320Gb and 640GB / Corsair H80 / Corsair 620 HX

  2. #127
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    950s and 975s are popping up everywhere now, still no word on a 930 people speculated about here...
    it might go EOL and be replaced by an 1156 cpu... thats very likely actually...

    but like i said before, why should we even care?
    xeons will be around for a while for anyone who wants a cheap and good ocing 1366 cpu...

    Intel Xeon UP W3520, 4x 2.67GHz, Sockel-1366, boxed (BX80601W3520) 250E... thats just 10E more than the 920...
    Last edited by saaya; 05-29-2009 at 08:33 AM.

  3. #128
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by herderien View Post
    this news is for me coherent with intel policy, they are going to put i5 on the market, and by then i920 and 940 will be almost a year old.
    To justify the difference in price between the two platforms, they will remove 920 and 940 and put in somthing like 930 and 950 (this one confirmed)
    to have a coherent price scale.

    hence high range i5 should be close to i920 in performance...
    You didn't look at the prices well enough. The fastest i5 costs more than 920 and 940

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819115201

    I'd already said, i5 is the replacement for 920 and 940, not 930 and 950 that will cost more than i5. There might be a little Overlap.
    Last edited by Donnie27; 05-29-2009 at 06:52 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  4. #129
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    1,374
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Who says they are? Specially when they just released a D0 version of it.
    Thats why I said I do not understand "if" this news are true lol and specially what you said they just released a D0 version of it...
    ░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█▀▀ ░░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█ ░░░
    ░█▀▀ ░█▀▀ ░█ ░█ ░░░░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█ ░░░
    ░▀▀▀ ░▀ ░░░▀ ░▀▀▀ ░░▀ ░░░▀░▀ ░▀ ░▀▀▀ ░

  5. #130
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    T.O.
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by hollo View Post
    yes. asus i7 "WS" boards also support ECC if you put a xeon in them (as well as the supermicro/tyan etc single socket 1366 boards, not sure about other 'desktop' mobo manufacturers)
    Yeah, I knew that 1366 supported it (suprisingly ASRock makes one), but I was unsure if 1156 would. Apparently, Foxhollow is the platform I should be interested in if they make workstation boards.

  6. #131
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    54
    Everybody needs to stop freaking out. Seriously, the 920 is simply going to be replaced with 930 just like 940-950 and 965-975. Everybody calm down. This isn't a big deal. I'l repeat just to get the point through.

    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930

  7. #132
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Rockville, MD
    Posts
    426
    Yea there is no way intel will get rid of the 920. I don't have any numbers, but just by pricing I imagine that 920s are the immense majority of 1366 socket chips sold. If they were discontinued, there would be almost zero volume of 1366 chips moved as well as x58 mobos.

  8. #133
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by cobra_kai View Post
    Yea there is no way intel will get rid of the 920. I don't have any numbers, but just by pricing I imagine that 920s are the immense majority of 1366 socket chips sold. If they were discontinued, there would be almost zero volume of 1366 chips moved as well as x58 mobos.
    But isn't that the reason why they want to discontinue it? Because it competes with i5 too much.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobbylite View Post
    with great MHZ comes great responsibility
    CPU:Q6600 G0 @ 3.825
    Motherboard:Asus P5E X38
    Memory:2x2GB OCZ Reapers DDR2 1066
    Graphics Card:Asus 4850
    Hard Drive:2xSegate 500gb 32MB Cache raid0
    Power Supply:Xion 800W
    Case:3DAurora
    CPU cooling: D-tek Fuzion V2 (Quad insert removed)
    GPU cooling: mcw60
    Monitor:24" LG

  9. #134
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    I also think people forget that each time they sell a 920. They also sell a X58. The more X58 sold the cheaper(read more profit) UP and DP server platforms and wrokstations aswell.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  10. #135
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by drizzt5 View Post
    But isn't that the reason why they want to discontinue it? Because it competes with i5 too much.
    That is the reason! Since the cheapest i5 doesn't have HT, that makes it not such a good deal anyway. It's that next 2.83GHz that things are being cleared for. Nehalem hasn't been more than niche product since it launched.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  11. #136
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by Odyssey96 View Post
    Everybody needs to stop freaking out. Seriously, the 920 is simply going to be replaced with 930 just like 940-950 and 965-975. Everybody calm down. This isn't a big deal. I'l repeat just to get the point through.

    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930
    920--->930
    and you base this on what?
    there is no 930...
    i agree that its no big deal tho, cause we still have xeons

    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    I also think people forget that each time they sell a 920. They also sell a X58. The more X58 sold the cheaper(read more profit) UP and DP server platforms and wrokstations aswell.
    i dont think thats a reason to keep the 920 alive and push 1366 over 1156...

    they obviosly make more money selling a cpu plus southbridge (p55) than they make selling a cpu plus nb (and a big one at that, x58) plus sb...

    sb is on older nodes and hence pretty much free, so with 1156 they can make 40$ selling something they gave away for free before! its pretty obvious how much more money intel can make with 1156 and why they will push it as much as they can... if it takes 920 to go eol to make 1156 more popular compared to 1366, rest assured, theyll do that.

    actually, like i said several times already, they will most likely move 920 from 1366 to 1156. so that means 920 is dead andwe get 2.66 and 2.8 ghz parts on 1156 instead.

    again, thats for mainstream, we, overclockers, have xeons that cost the same, clock better, and actually have better turbo modes!
    so who cares?
    Last edited by saaya; 05-29-2009 at 10:46 PM.

  12. #137
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    380
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    and you base this on what?
    sb is on older nodes and hence pretty much free, so with 1156 they can make 40$ selling something they gave away for free before! its pretty obvious how much more money intel can make with 1156 and why they will push it as much as they can... if it takes 920 to go eol to make 1156 more popular compared to 1366, rest assured, theyll do that.
    thats what happens when there is no competition atleast they'd have included usb 3 and sata 3 for that $40

  13. #138
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    132
    So hypothetically speaking if somebody owns an Intel Core I7 940 CPU and it's under warranty and it somehow gets damaged. Would Intel replace it with the 950 instead?
    Under the hood:
    Motherboard - MSI Big Bang Xpower
    CPU - Intel Core I7 970 3.2 @ 4.4ghz/w 1.28vcore
    Cooler- Intel Stock Heatsink
    RAM - Gskill Trident 3x2gb @ 2100 cl9
    GPU -2x Nvidia GTX 580 SLI
    Soundcard - Creative xfi xtremegamer
    DVDRW - LG 22x DVD RW Drive
    Samsung Spinpoint f3 500gb HDD
    Tower- MM Ascension CYO Brushed Aluminum
    Monitor - Sony Bravia 40" LED 1080p 120hz
    Keyboard - Razer Tarantula
    Mouse - Logitech G5

  14. #139
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Zaxis01 View Post
    So hypothetically speaking if somebody owns an Intel Core I7 940 CPU and it's under warranty and it somehow gets damaged. Would Intel replace it with the 950 instead?
    It would be your vendor that replaces it I guess. And you only get a 950 if they are out of stock with 940. So the answer here and now and the next month or 3 would be a big no.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  15. #140
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by geo View Post
    thats what happens when there is no competition atleast they'd have included usb 3 and sata 3 for that $40
    i think they wouldnt have changed any of the tech... the only thing that would change with propper competition would be prices...

    amd doesnt have usb3 and sata3 so why should intel add it?
    tho i have to agree, its odd that sata3 and usb3 launch without an intel chipset supporting it, but with third party chips...

  16. #141
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,261
    3 sockels by intel.. i was right anyway.. Ebay is next

  17. #142
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    near Boston, MA, USA
    Posts
    1,955
    930 is MIA when the 950 is out...

  18. #143
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    752
    do xeons require anything special... i wanna get into core i7 but by the time i have enough money... they'll be discontinued... you think xeons would work just fine in a standard board?

  19. #144
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Barack Hussein Obama-Biden's Nation
    Posts
    1,084
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    and you base this on what?
    there is no 930...
    i agree that its no big deal tho, cause we still have xeons


    i dont think thats a reason to keep the 920 alive and push 1366 over 1156...

    they obviosly make more money selling a cpu plus southbridge (p55) than they make selling a cpu plus nb (and a big one at that, x58) plus sb...

    sb is on older nodes and hence pretty much free, so with 1156 they can make 40$ selling something they gave away for free before! its pretty obvious how much more money intel can make with 1156 and why they will push it as much as they can... if it takes 920 to go eol to make 1156 more popular compared to 1366, rest assured, theyll do that.

    actually, like i said several times already, they will most likely move 920 from 1366 to 1156. so that means 920 is dead andwe get 2.66 and 2.8 ghz parts on 1156 instead.

    again, thats for mainstream, we, overclockers, have xeons that cost the same, clock better, and actually have better turbo modes!
    so who cares?
    Last I looked, the Xeons were more expensive. There was a dual-core Xeon W3503 that has 4MB of L3 cache that is included in HP workstations only. I saw the chip selling on Ebay for $140 shipped but it's only 2.4GHz, although it supports triple-channel DDR3 and HT for 4 virtual cores. I assume the multiplier to be locked at the upper limit, which would mean 18x (or 19x for TurboBoost), right?

    All the other 1366 Xeons are much more expensive and they're all low in availability. The one that's similar to the 920 is hovering at around $330. The D0 920 can be had for at least $50 less, so why go for a Xeon? Better turbo modes?? Really?

    --two awesome rigs, wildly customized with
    5.1 Sony speakers, Stereo 3D, UV Tourmaline Confexia, Flame Bl00dr4g3 Fatal1ty
    --SONY GDM-FW900 24" widescreen CRT, overclocked to:
    2560x1600 resolution at 68Hz!(from 2304x1440@80Hz)

    Updated List of Video Card GPU Voodoopower Ratings!!!!!

  20. #145
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,601
    Xeons are a lot more expensive here.

    Thanks Intel, now I'm going to i7 half a year earlier than I would have liked. It looks like you won. . . against my poor bank account

  21. #146
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    160
    930 is only speculation.

  22. #147
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    1,940
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    I also think people forget that each time they sell a 920. They also sell a X58. The more X58 sold the cheaper(read more profit) UP and DP server platforms and wrokstations aswell.
    and you forget that everytime intel sells an i5 CPU they make even more money on P55 than they do with X58 as the P55 is just an extremely overpriced southbridge
    Core i7 2600k|HD 6950|8GB RipJawsX|2x 128gb Samsung SSD 830 Raid0|Asus Sabertooth P67
    Seasonic X-560|Corsair 650D|2x WD Red 3TB Raid1|WD Green 3TB|Asus Xonar Essence STX


    Core i3 2100|HD 7770|8GB RipJawsX|128gb Samsung SSD 830|Asrock Z77 Pro4-M
    Bequiet! E9 400W|Fractal Design Arc Mini|3x Hitachi 7k1000.C|Asus Xonar DX


    Dell Latitude E6410|Core i7 620m|8gb DDR3|WXGA+ Screen|Nvidia Quadro NVS3100
    256gb Samsung PB22-J|Intel Wireless 6300|Sierra Aircard MC8781|WD Scorpio Blue 1TB


    Harman Kardon HK1200|Vienna Acoustics Brandnew|AKG K240 Monitor 600ohm|Sony CDP 228ESD

  23. #148
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by generics_user View Post
    and you forget that everytime intel sells an i5 CPU they make even more money on P55 than they do with X58 as the P55 is just an extremely overpriced southbridge
    i doubt theres much difference in how much profit they make, X58 is ~20$ more expensive then a P55. (at least that where the rumors that where floating around somewhere)

    Quote Originally Posted by orangekiwii View Post
    do xeons require anything special... i wanna get into core i7 but by the time i have enough money... they'll be discontinued... you think xeons would work just fine in a standard board?
    no, UP xeons just work like normal i7.

  24. #149
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    122
    Someone may have mentioned this, but I think 1366 socket processors with 6 cores are in our upgrade path for the future. Oh well.
    Workstation/Playstation: i7 920 D0 @ 3.8, TRUE, EVGA x58, BFG GTX 295, WD 640x2 in RAID 0, 12GB OCZ DDR3, ATCS 840, Dell 24" & Samsung 19", Razer Lycosa and Logitech G9r, HTO Striker, Windows 7 Ult. 64, Antec TruePower 1000w.
    Wife's Computer: E4500 @ 3.0GHz on 1.36v, Rocketfish CPU Cooler, Foxconn, 4GB Corsair, Sea 250, Antec Sonata w/500w, ATI 2400, 17" Samsung, Vista Ult. 32.
    HTPC: X2 2400BE, 500GB + 750GB + 80GB, ATI 3450 Hybrid CF w/Asus 780G, 4GB A-Data 800MHz DDR2, 32" Westinghouse, XBOX 360 HDDVD (w/o xbox), Aver DTV Tuner, Huappage DTV tuner, Windows 7 32 bit.
    PDAs: iPod Touch 16GB and Samsung Omnia

    See my work log here: PROJECT ATCS 840

  25. #150
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    420
    Quote Originally Posted by SirKronan View Post
    Someone may have mentioned this, but I think 1366 socket processors with 6 cores are in our upgrade path for the future. Oh well.
    Yea but they'll only be readily available for ~8-9 months before Sandy Bridge drops, making the upgrade before then pointless for any current i7 users. The slight boost to productivity is offset by the massive depreciation in value once Sandy Bridge drops.
    Bill Cosby: Stewie, what do you think candy is made out of?
    Stewie Griffin: Sunshine and farts! What the hell kind of question is that?!

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •