Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 50

Thread: XFX 4890 Black Edition v Zotac GTX285 Infinity review. 19th Jun 2009

  1. #1
    Xtremely Kool
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,875

    XFX 4890 Black Edition v Zotac GTX285 Infinity review. 19th Jun 2009


  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    950
    nice review man 4890 for performance and price clearly comes out on top

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,601
    Yeah surprising that ATI could do that. I'm more impressed by the performance of the BE clocks over the stock clocks. Gee I never thought I would want to oc my gpus but the gains are sizable.

  4. #4
    Engineering The Xtreme
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    7,217
    I've been trying to tell people for ages that ATI rv7xx Mhz > Nv gt2xx Mhz as far as performance goes but everyone always said to me that I am just a fanboy

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Well honestly I knew the performance of HD4890 @ 1GHz was great, but this is just insane...

    Considering a game like Tom Clancy's H.A.W.X is included this is a very cheap card in evey possible way.
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770

  6. #6
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    Quote Originally Posted by MomijiTMO View Post
    Yeah surprising that ATI could do that. I'm more impressed by the performance of the BE clocks over the stock clocks. Gee I never thought I would want to oc my gpus but the gains are sizable.
    so u get 20% more clock speed and more than enough ram bandwidth what did u think would happen. if u oc anything by 20% and remove its choke point it will get sizable gains
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Downunder
    Posts
    1,313
    Not sure the performance is worth the noise though. AMD needs to put a nice quiet cooler on their cards for once.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,601
    I just didn't expect to see 13fps increase in Crysis Warhead [at their settings and res]. We've seen oced cards before and usually the gains were what? 5fps?

  9. #9
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    I only see some games that favour ATI and some that favour Nvidia, like it always has been. Price/performance ratio the ATI is a magnificent piece of hardware !

    To be honest this Zotac Infinity is a turn down (prolly not enough GPU core) as the BFG cards clock far better with their watercooling block (750GPU, 1450 rams and 1700 shaders are a no brainer with them cards) Also the differenes between the Atomic and the BE seem a big steep to me... for the same GPU clocks... and lesser ram clocks...
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  10. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Downunder
    Posts
    1,313
    Quote Originally Posted by MomijiTMO View Post
    I just didn't expect to see 13fps increase in Crysis Warhead [at their settings and res]. We've seen oced cards before and usually the gains were what? 5fps?
    That's max FPS, for all we know it could have spiked to that for a second or two. The min moves up by 3FPS and the average by 4FPS. A shame that the game is FLOPtomised so much for NVIDIA hardware that the 275 still beats it.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Quote Originally Posted by randomizer View Post
    Not sure the performance is worth the noise though. AMD needs to put a nice quiet cooler on their cards for once.
    There are tons of HD4890 1GB with a 1GHz clock that doesn't follow referens design so what are you on about?
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770

  12. #12
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    Quote Originally Posted by randomizer View Post
    Not sure the performance is worth the noise though. AMD needs to put a nice quiet cooler on their cards for once.
    the BE has a 4 heat pipe cooler with the normal fan so its not any louder than the 280 or 4870 were and u can get some 3rd party cooler and card for less than the 285.
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Downunder
    Posts
    1,313
    Quote Originally Posted by Smartidiot89 View Post
    There are tons of HD4890 1GB with a 1GHz clock that doesn't follow referens design so what are you on about?
    AMD doesn't make those. AMD needs to design a quiet reference cooler so that the cheaper cards are also quiet. I don't want to pay more for an aftermarket cooler just to protect my ears.

  14. #14
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    Quote Originally Posted by randomizer View Post
    AMD doesn't make those. AMD needs to design a quiet reference cooler so that the cheaper cards are also quiet. I don't want to pay more for an aftermarket cooler just to protect my ears.
    at least the caps dont whine, u can fix the ati cards. and most of it IMO is the variable speed so it gets way to hot since the minimum is to low so then it toggles back and forth from fan settings that it shouldent be using since its running way to high the to low and oscillating, if they changed is so if over 40 change speed then if under 37 change so its not in the .1 degree that it wont stay at and so that it will run at a high rpm so it can almost shut off like u can do with manual settings. or set it to keep higher fan speeds for 30 sec or something
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  15. #15
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Quote Originally Posted by randomizer View Post
    AMD doesn't make those. AMD needs to design a quiet reference cooler so that the cheaper cards are also quiet. I don't want to pay more for an aftermarket cooler just to protect my ears.
    The reference designs aren't noisy I have no idea where you got that from. Just use the fancontroller to decrease it.

    The GPU might become abit hotter but it's designed for 90-100C under fulload 24/7 so that's not an issue considering all the hot air is being shoved out in the back.
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770

  16. #16
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Downunder
    Posts
    1,313
    Well "noisy" is subjective. Plus I'm used to no noise coming from my card, which is nice since the previous card I owned could be heard across the house (I certainly don't want that again and I know the 4890 isn't that loud).
    Last edited by randomizer; 06-21-2009 at 03:08 AM.

  17. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,601
    60% fan speed it's comparable to a Scythe 3000 UK.

  18. #18
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,838
    the video section of the review doesnt make too much sense.
    sure, there is cuda for coreavc, but even better is just plain dxva with media player classic home cinema.
    and he says mkv when he means h264. to play an mkv, you only need haali media splitter, you dont need coreavc.
    to decode h264, you can use alot of things.
    DFI P965-S/core 2 quad q6600@3.2ghz/4gb gskill ddr2 @ 800mhz cas 4/xfx gtx 260/ silverstone op650/thermaltake xaser 3 case/razer lachesis

  19. #19
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Long Beach, CA
    Posts
    972
    Anyone know where you can pickup a XFX 4890 Black Edition in the US yet?
    CPU: Intel Core i7-4770K 4.8GHz
    MOBO: GIGABYTE GA-G1.Sniper M5 MATX 1150
    MEMORY: G.SKILL Trident X 8GB 2400MHz 9-11-11-31 1T
    GPU: 2 x eVGA GTX 780 SC
    SOUND KRK Rokit 5 Limited Edition White Studio Monitors
    SSD: 4 x Samsung 128GB Pro's Raid 0
    PSU: SeaSonic Platinum 1000W
    COOLING: 2 x Alphacool NexXxoS UT60 Full Copper 420mm 6 x Swiftech Helix 140mm Fans
    CASE: Lian Li PC-C32B TECH STATION MOD build log coming soon
    MONITOR: ASUS VG278HE Black 27" 149Hz
    O.S: Windows 7 Pro x64

  20. #20
    Wanna look under my kilt?
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Glasgow-ish U.K.
    Posts
    4,396
    Top-end Vs top-end is technically fair but a watercooled card Vs a stock air cooler is a bit random all the same.

    The noise and value for money conclusions get skewed.
    Quote Originally Posted by T_M View Post
    Not sure i totally follow anything you said, but regardless of that you helped me come up with a very good idea....
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    you sigged that?

    why?
    ______

    Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.

  21. #21
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    420
    Quote Originally Posted by randomizer View Post
    Not sure the performance is worth the noise though. AMD needs to put a nice quiet cooler on their cards for once.
    Then don't buy the OC'd cards with the stock coolers. The ones with the same clocks and aftermarket coolers are like $10 more, and run cooler/quieter, allowing you to squeeze even more out it.

    Quote Originally Posted by randomizer View Post
    AMD doesn't make those. AMD needs to design a quiet reference cooler so that the cheaper cards are also quiet. I don't want to pay more for an aftermarket cooler just to protect my ears.
    What? The price difference to get the cards with aftermarket coolers out of the box is pocket change.

    Even with the stock coolers you can set the fan speed to a set figure so that it's the same volume as any other card. The ATI chips are designed to run at higher temps anyways. ATI themselves said it.
    Last edited by kgk; 06-21-2009 at 06:34 AM.
    Bill Cosby: Stewie, what do you think candy is made out of?
    Stewie Griffin: Sunshine and farts! What the hell kind of question is that?!

  22. #22
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    420
    Quote Originally Posted by K404 View Post
    Top-end Vs top-end is technically fair but a watercooled card Vs a stock air cooler is a bit random all the same.

    The noise and value for money conclusions get skewed.
    It's showing how much you have to spend on a single GPU Nvidia setup to equal the performance of the OC'd 4890. Plus the watercooled 285 is clocked higher from the factory than the overclocked air versions (including the ones with aftermarket heatpipes), so if the comparison had been against the air cooled Nvidia offering it would have fared even worse.

    I can see where noise might be a pointless comparison since one is silent on water though.
    Last edited by kgk; 06-21-2009 at 06:49 AM.
    Bill Cosby: Stewie, what do you think candy is made out of?
    Stewie Griffin: Sunshine and farts! What the hell kind of question is that?!

  23. #23
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    1,910
    Where I can buy XFX 4890 BE in Russia ?

    Intel Q9650 @500x9MHz/1,3V
    Asus Maximus II Formula @Performance Level=7
    OCZ OCZ2B1200LV4GK 4x2GB @1200MHz/5-5-5-15/1,8V
    OCZ SSD Vertex 3 120Gb
    Seagate RAID0 2x ST1000DM003
    XFX HD7970 3GB @1111MHz
    Thermaltake Xaser VI BWS
    Seasonic Platinum SS-1000XP
    M-Audio Audiophile 192
    LG W2486L
    Liquid Cooling System :
    ThermoChill PA120.3 + Coolgate 4x120
    Swiftech Apogee XT, Swiftech MCW-NBMAX Northbridge
    Watercool HeatKiller GPU-X3 79X0 Ni-Bl + HeatKiller GPU Backplate 79X0
    Laing 12V DDC-1Plus with XSPC Laing DDC Reservoir Top
    3x Scythe S-FLEX "F", 4x Scythe Gentle Typhoon "15", Scythe Kaze Master Ace 5,25''

    Apple MacBook Pro 17` Early 2011:
    CPU: Sandy Bridge Intel Core i7 2720QM
    RAM: Crucial 2x4GB DDR3 1333
    SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256 GB SSD
    HDD: ADATA Nobility NH13 1GB White
    OS: Mac OS X Mavericks

  24. #24
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,264
    Quote Originally Posted by randomizer View Post
    Well "noisy" is subjective. Plus I'm used to no noise coming from my card, which is nice since the previous card I owned could be heard across the house (I certainly don't want that again and I know the 4890 isn't that loud).
    Well for what it's worth, the 4890 is the loudest card over the last 2 years. ( I've tested / ran the majority of ATI/Nvidia stock solutions ) I already find the 295 to be too loud personally ( although they are a tad quieter than the 4870x2 ) so anything (considerably) beyond that is just a tad fail in my eyes. Again its totally subjective but to say it isn't loud comparatively would be a lie. Now all my comments on noise are based on default fan profiles so yes although its possible to force your card to not exceed a certain speed threshold, its usually not wise ( and if you are able to, you probaley have alot of airflow to compensate which in itself will already be fairly loud )

    Noise aside, I'm quite impressed with the 4890s. I'm seeing a few for close to $200 cnd on sale without a rebate so thats pretty sweet performance wise. ( 285s still push $350-400 ) I've been content enough with my 8800gt however over the last while ( even if I'm running most things at 1280x800 )
    Last edited by Chickenfeed; 06-21-2009 at 08:18 AM.
    Feedanator 7.0
    CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
    LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i

  25. #25
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    1,940
    the 4890 BE is a great card but the sapphire 1ghz card is a better choice IMO

    it makes use of the reference pcb just like the XFX one so alot of aftermarket watercoolers are available and a much better stock cooler (those vapor-x coolers are great!)
    Core i7 2600k|HD 6950|8GB RipJawsX|2x 128gb Samsung SSD 830 Raid0|Asus Sabertooth P67
    Seasonic X-560|Corsair 650D|2x WD Red 3TB Raid1|WD Green 3TB|Asus Xonar Essence STX


    Core i3 2100|HD 7770|8GB RipJawsX|128gb Samsung SSD 830|Asrock Z77 Pro4-M
    Bequiet! E9 400W|Fractal Design Arc Mini|3x Hitachi 7k1000.C|Asus Xonar DX


    Dell Latitude E6410|Core i7 620m|8gb DDR3|WXGA+ Screen|Nvidia Quadro NVS3100
    256gb Samsung PB22-J|Intel Wireless 6300|Sierra Aircard MC8781|WD Scorpio Blue 1TB


    Harman Kardon HK1200|Vienna Acoustics Brandnew|AKG K240 Monitor 600ohm|Sony CDP 228ESD

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •