Post your PPD rates !!

**GTSRboy** · 03-16-2009, 06:53 PM

Its OCed but thats from EVGA, its at about 730mhz (thats what the + is). I havnt done anything to it. I used to crank out a work unit every 1.5 hours, it was doing that for a week straight, now it takes about 12 hours to do one. IDK why its slowed down so much, i reinstalled the program and it still does it. On top of that, my CPU (Q9300) cant fold at all now. It work fine but it has a 'serious error' once i open up F@H

I have been folding with the 9800+, Q9300, and a PS3 round the clock. The combo of all that is about 6,200 ppd. Before i realised there was a seperate GPU program i was averaging about 1,400 ppd (q9300+PS3), so the 9800+ is doing slightly under 5k/day. Of course, thats what i was* doing

**INFRNL** · 03-16-2009, 07:25 PM

Originally Posted by GTSRboy

Its OCed but thats from EVGA, its at about 730mhz (thats what the + is). I havnt done anything to it. I used to crank out a work unit every 1.5 hours, it was doing that for a week straight, now it takes about 12 hours to do one. IDK why its slowed down so much, i reinstalled the program and it still does it. On top of that, my CPU (Q9300) cant fold at all now. It work fine but it has a 'serious error' once i open up F@H

I have been folding with the 9800+, Q9300, and a PS3 round the clock. The combo of all that is about 6,200 ppd. Before i realised there was a seperate GPU program i was averaging about 1,400 ppd (q9300+PS3), so the 9800+ is doing slightly under 5k/day. Of course, thats what i was* doing

Thanks; So if you oc the shaders via rivatuner you should result in higher ppd with the 9800gtx+.

as far as you problem idk. maybe something changed and is conflicting between the smp and the gpu clients somehow. maybe you are now running the newer wu's but shouldnt take 12 hours. is your system running hotter, are you on it more than you used to be. Im sure someone with more knowledge can help yo. I am still a neb when it comes to DC

**WFO** · 03-17-2009, 04:11 AM

-- I-7 gpu 1 -- GTX 295 5903

Min. Time / Frame : 2mn 00s - 12096.00 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 2mn 07s - 11429.29 ppd
Cur. Time / Frame : 3mn 20s - 7257.60 ppd
R3F. Time / Frame : 3mn 19s - 7294.07 ppd
Eff. Time / Frame : 3mn 17s - 7368.12 ppd

**GTSRboy** · 03-17-2009, 12:55 PM

All my 'problems' are cleared up, i wasnt folding with SMP, im not sure why the old program wasnt working but now im on SMP for the CPU. The GPU is acting strane and taking long because its getting new work units, its PDD is holding at a steady 5700. If you OC a 9800GTX i assume it would be essentially the same as a +. Ive heard you can push the shaders a bit farther even on the + also

**INFRNL** · 03-17-2009, 05:27 PM

My PPD on my 4850 have been up for the past couple of days; not sure why. I am running almost 4K PPD on it now and it was running closer to 3k or less previously; Im not complaining though; however I would like to see some better #'s. My 48030 almost seems like its running a little slower, but maybe the wu's its been running. will have to look into that later. Might be trading it for a 9800gt with a friend. will see what I can produce with that before I make a final decision, but I am only been getting around 2500 ppd on the 4830; so I think the 9800GT will get closer to 5k ppd

**GTSRboy** · 03-17-2009, 07:37 PM

My roomate has a 9800GT, he says the PPD on it varies from 4-5k

**INFRNL** · 03-18-2009, 07:57 PM

So I am auditioning my buddy's 9800GT. stock on my 4.4ghz 9550 also runing 4 threads of WCG am getting approx 4kppd (stock speeds) on 5903's. I am using the latest driver; cant recall # exactly. so I am getting approx 1-1.5k more than 4830 was getting. not bad. not sure how much more I would get from oc'ing; possibly up to 500ppd maybe. I will monitor more to see if points avg out. I have monitor set to all frames. Fahmon says approx 10hrs eta.

**GTSRboy** · 04-21-2009, 01:25 PM

285 came, and i OCed th Q9300 to 3.0ghz so im up to about 11,500 ppd potential myself. My roomates occasionally fold for me, they total about 8,000 PPD in processing power.

285 = 8250 PPD @ 722 / 1587 / 1276 fan at 73
Q9300 = 2200 PPD @ 3.0ghz (400*7.5)
PS3 = 900 PPD
Laptop = 1500 Points every other day

**p2501** · 04-21-2009, 10:50 PM

What a big chunk, 1888 points, near 6h to complete:

Project : 5904
Core : GPU2 NV MT
Frames : 100
Credit : 1888

-- GTX295-0 --

Min. Time / Frame : 3mn 28s - 7842.46 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 3mn 29s - 7804.94 ppd
Cur. Time / Frame : 3mn 40s - 7414.69 ppd
R3F. Time / Frame : 3mn 40s - 7414.69 ppd
Eff. Time / Frame : 3mn 35s - 7587.13 ppd

**OldChap** · 04-22-2009, 08:08 AM

Think of us lesser mortals then ..those take 8 hours for me still, output is better than some 511's THOSE are the ones I don't like some even dip into the high 3kppd range

**p2501** · 04-22-2009, 10:12 AM

I shouldn't have ebayed at least one of my 9600GSOs then, I wonder how long one of these would have taken on them... -_-;

**shadowwind** · 04-22-2009, 12:15 PM

Originally Posted by p2501

I shouldn't have ebayed at least one of my 9600GSOs then, I wonder how long one of these would have taken on them... -_-;

14 to 16 hours depending what the other gso is doing i asked my brother he is
still folding on them.

**p2501** · 04-22-2009, 10:24 PM

Originally Posted by shadowwind

14 to 16 hours

Okay, that is massive.

**shadowwind** · 05-11-2009, 05:41 PM

any one folding with the gtx 260s what is the ppd with the current WUs

**INFRNL** · 05-11-2009, 08:39 PM

I dont recommend the 192's... I am only getting from 5k- 6300. I have a couple that are @ 8k but I dont know if those #'s are accurate. I think The 216 260's should get in the 7 k range

I fint it like this: 9800gt= 4500k give or take...gts 250 is approx 1k more ppd, 260 216 is approx 1k more ppd more than 250, gtx 275 is approx 1 k more than 260, and would guess the 285 would be approx 1 k more than 275. I would say give or take approx 500 ppd for ea. my gtx 275 gets into the 92-9300k range so that would be approx 1500 ish more than 260.

This is roughly what I have concluded in my research. Obviously depends on wu's. Me personally I would run at least a gtx 260 216 if your trying to push out more ppd. JMO though

EDIT:lol, or are you trying to compare your gts 250's? shouldnt be too far behind the 260s, still approx 1k

**PoppaGeek** · 05-12-2009, 12:32 AM

Originally Posted by shadowwind

any one folding with the gtx 260s what is the ppd with the current WUs

I just got a GTX 260 192 today. First WU FAHmon showed ppd of 6630, second WU says it is Project 5756 and PPD is 4286.45.

EDIT: Reading log: First WU was a 5767, 353 points I THINK. Second is 5756 and 511 points. Hope that helps.

**HuffPCair** · 05-12-2009, 01:19 AM

my 9800GTX+ usually does around 6700 PPD going off FAHMON

**PoppaGeek** · 05-12-2009, 01:24 AM

The different size WUs and the way FAHMon jumps around it is kinda hard to tell what your PPD is. Need to keep a track record to get a real feel for it I guess.

**HuffPCair** · 05-12-2009, 01:26 AM

Originally Posted by PoppaGeek

The different size WUs and the way FAHMon jumps around it is kinda hard to tell what your PPD is. Need to keep a track record to get a real feel for it I guess.

Yeah I dont pay attention much I am not doing it for the points really. I am just doing it for the cure and what else is my computer going to do when I am not here. Only thing I worry about is making sure they are getting done correctly and in a timely fashion.

**PoppaGeek** · 05-12-2009, 01:40 AM

The numbers help in buying decisions.

**shadowwind** · 05-12-2009, 04:39 AM

yes and no the numbers do help but the budget is what i go by in the end
i decided to get a blue ray in stead of getting the gtx 270s and the budget
allowed me to put 2 gts 250s in that build if they want to try and fold on them..
and to me if i was going for points it would be with the 295s i just dont want the rma problems if it happens to fail. thanks this will help when he comes get
his computer on ppd . its for a potential new folder i hope.

**OldChap** · 05-13-2009, 03:39 PM

gtx260 192shaders clocked to 1620 these numbers are fairly typical

Code:

Project : 5749
 Core    : GPUv2 Gromacs
 Frames  : 100
 Credit  : 511


 -- 260-2 --

 Min. Time / Frame : 1mn 20s  - 5518.80 ppd
 Avg. Time / Frame : 1mn 20s  - 5518.80 ppd
 No Cur. Time / Frame
 No R3F. Time / Frame
 No Eff. Time / Frame


 -- 260-1 --

 Min. Time / Frame : 1mn 21s  - 5450.67 ppd
 Avg. Time / Frame : 1mn 21s  - 5450.67 ppd
 No Cur. Time / Frame
 No R3F. Time / Frame
 No Eff. Time / Frame


Project : 5757
 Core    : GPUv2 Gromacs
 Frames  : 100
 Credit  : 384


 -- 260-2 --

 Min. Time / Frame : 50s  - 6635.52 ppd
 Avg. Time / Frame : 50s  - 6635.52 ppd
 No Cur. Time / Frame
 No R3F. Time / Frame
 No Eff. Time / Frame


 -- 260-1 --

 Min. Time / Frame : 50s  - 6635.52 ppd
 Avg. Time / Frame : 50s  - 6635.52 ppd
 No Cur. Time / Frame
 No R3F. Time / Frame
 No Eff. Time / Frame
Project : 5765
 Core    : GPUv2 Gromacs
 Frames  : 100
 Credit  : 353


 -- 260-2 --

 Min. Time / Frame : 37s  - 8243.03 ppd
 Avg. Time / Frame : 37s  - 8243.03 ppd
 No Cur. Time / Frame
 No R3F. Time / Frame
 No Eff. Time / Frame


 -- 260-1 --

 Min. Time / Frame : 37s  - 8243.03 ppd
 Avg. Time / Frame : 37s  - 8243.03 ppd
 No Cur. Time / Frame
 No R3F. Time / Frame
 No Eff. Time / Frame

Project : 5774
 Core    : GPUv2 Gromacs
 Frames  : 100
 Credit  : 768


 -- 260-2 --

 Min. Time / Frame : 1mn 39s  - 6702.55 ppd
 Avg. Time / Frame : 1mn 39s  - 6702.55 ppd
 No Cur. Time / Frame
 No R3F. Time / Frame
 No Eff. Time / Frame


 -- 260-1 --

 Min. Time / Frame : 1mn 39s  - 6702.55 ppd
 Avg. Time / Frame : 1mn 39s  - 6702.55 ppd
 No Cur. Time / Frame
 No R3F. Time / Frame
 No Eff. Time / Frame

Project : 5900
 Core    : GPU2 NV MT
 Frames  : 100
 Credit  : 472


 -- 260-2 --

 Min. Time / Frame : 55s  - 7414.69 ppd
 Avg. Time / Frame : 1mn 03s  - 6473.14 ppd
 No Cur. Time / Frame
 No R3F. Time / Frame
 No Eff. Time / Frame


 -- 260-1 --

 Min. Time / Frame : 55s  - 7414.69 ppd
 Avg. Time / Frame : 1mn 01s  - 6685.38 ppd
 No Cur. Time / Frame
 No R3F. Time / Frame
 No Eff. Time / Frame

Project : 5903
 Core    : GPU2 NV MT
 Frames  : 100
 Credit  : 1888


 -- 260-2 --

 Min. Time / Frame : 3mn 58s  - 6853.92 ppd
 Avg. Time / Frame : 4mn 15s  - 6396.99 ppd
 No Cur. Time / Frame
 No R3F. Time / Frame
 No Eff. Time / Frame


 -- 260-1 --

 Min. Time / Frame : 4mn 07s  - 6604.18 ppd
 Avg. Time / Frame : 4mn 17s  - 6347.21 ppd
 No Cur. Time / Frame
 No R3F. Time / Frame
 No Eff. Time / Frame

**shadowwind** · 05-13-2009, 04:57 PM

nice and thank you OC that is what i wanted the gts 250s are really not that far behind in points i got 2 Danger den blocks coming for the gts 250s i want to push the shader some on water i will post results if i got some thing positive
in PPD. I WAS FORCE TO TAKE A VACATION AND USE UP ALL MY VACATION
TIME I GOT 10 WEEKS TO GO TALK ABOUT BEING BORED LOL.

**INFRNL** · 05-13-2009, 05:00 PM

Originally Posted by HuffPCair

my 9800GTX+ usually does around 6700 PPD going off FAHMON

Thats weird; how is a basically GTS 250 getting higher ppd than a 260? My gts 250 got a hair lower #'s than the 260 192. I think my 260 192 gets approx 3-500 ppd less than my old gts 250.

I will have to check but I think my 260 192 #'s are similar to OC's. Lately most of the wu's are giving me an avg of around 6k ppd, and some closer to 5K

**HuffPCair** · 05-13-2009, 05:04 PM

Originally Posted by INFRNL

Thats weird; how is a basically GTS 250 getting higher ppd than a 260? My gts 250 got a hair lower #'s than the 260 192. I think my 260 192 gets approx 3-500 ppd less than my old gts 250.

I will have to check but I think my 260 192 #'s are similar to OC's. Lately most of the wu's are giving me an avg of around 6k ppd, and some closer to 5K

Got me but like I said I am going off FAHMON plus that is just the few projects PPDs I have looked at again like I said never really cared how high any of my stuff is as long as it is getting completed right and in a timely fashion

Thread: Post your PPD rates !!

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rate This Thread

Display

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions