Page 4 of 13 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 311

Thread: Windows 7 - What's your experience index?

  1. #76
    The Doctor Warboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    2,596
    I get Gaming 6.0 with my GTX 280 FTW thats the same as a 8800GTX posted above, Wth?
    My Rig can do EpicFLOPs, Can yours?
    Once this baby hits 88 TeraFLOPs, You're going to see some serious $@#%....

    Build XT7 is currently active.
    Current OS Systems: Windows 10 64bit

  2. #77
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,430
    Quote Originally Posted by Warboy View Post
    I get Gaming 6.0 with my GTX 280 FTW thats the same as a 8800GTX posted above, Wth?
    IDK but one of the reasons I don't upgrade my card is I see less than 20% increase in most benchmarks.

  3. #78
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    122
    i still think the gtx350 will be worth it or at least wait a while till the price drops after its release, but then there will be something bigger and better. i.t. industry is a never winning situation. thats the reason im in the mechanical industry instead of i.t.

    mind you, you can have the latest and greatest grfx cards in the world, but it comes down to the o/s, drivers and software to take full advantage of the hardware, like my situation, i had money when the 98gx2 came out, i got 2 of them, then about a month later the gtx280 / 260 was released, i felt like i had wasted $1200aud on brick heaters, and a single gtx280 kicks its ass which is really disappointing. happens i guess.
    Last edited by rickvtv6; 01-22-2009 at 01:18 AM.

  4. #79
    The Doctor Warboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    2,596
    Quote Originally Posted by ewitte View Post
    IDK but one of the reasons I don't upgrade my card is I see less than 20% increase in most benchmarks.
    I went from 15xxx to 22xxx with my upgrades, So whats your point about seeing less then 20% increase?

    My GTX 280 outperforms my 8800GTX OC2 in SLI. That I sold. lol.
    My Rig can do EpicFLOPs, Can yours?
    Once this baby hits 88 TeraFLOPs, You're going to see some serious $@#%....

    Build XT7 is currently active.
    Current OS Systems: Windows 10 64bit

  5. #80
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,430
    Quote Originally Posted by Warboy View Post
    I went from 15xxx to 22xxx with my upgrades, So whats your point about seeing less then 20% increase?

    My GTX 280 outperforms my 8800GTX OC2 in SLI. That I sold. lol.
    I just dont' feel the small performance increase is worth it. Not unless there is a 2-3 times improvement in almost everything. A card thats 2 years newer SHOULD be much faster not just 20-50%.

  6. #81
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    931

  7. #82
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by rickvtv6 View Post
    man thats some impressive scores! i remember saying something about ssd drives becoming the way of the future as i heard 1tb drives are soo big and slow? lol

    rge: if your i7 is at 4.2ghz i wonder what speed it would need to hit 7.9? also, how much RAM have you installed on your setup?
    6gb 1600mhz

    My hdtune burst rate in windows 7 is 1000 more than vista.
    i7 965
    ASUS P6T OC Palm edition-Looking to try new X58 board...Wanna trade?
    Sapphire 4870x2
    ASUS 4870 1GB
    6gb G.skill 1600mhz
    G.skill 128gb SSDX2 RAID 0
    TT toughpower 850W

  8. #83
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    6,465
    This really requires a quadcore and a lot of memory!
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z | FX 8350 | 2x4GB Trident-X 2600 C10 | 2x ATI HD5870 Crossfire | Enermax Revo 1050watt | OCZ Vertex 3 60GB | Samsung F1 1TB

    Watercooling: XSPC Raystorm | EK 5870 Delrin fullcover | TFC X-changer 480 w/ 4x Gentle Typhoon | DDC2+ Delrin top | EK 200mm res | Primochill LRT 3/8 tubing

    Case: Murdermodded TJ-07

    sub 9 sec. SPi1M 940BE 955BE 965BE 1090T

  9. #84
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Redmond, WA
    Posts
    217
    Version: Build 7000 x64
    EIS: 4.3
    Whitebox: HP xw6600
    CPU: E5410 2.33GHz (7.1)
    RAM: 8x2GB DDR2-667 FBDIMM (7.1)
    HDD: 1x300GB VelociRaptor (5.9)
    GPU: eVGA 7300GT (4.7/4.3)

  10. #85
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    122
    Quote Originally Posted by kevikev View Post
    Version: Build 7000 x64
    EIS: 4.3
    Whitebox: HP xw6600
    CPU: E5410 2.33GHz (7.1)
    RAM: 8x2GB DDR2-667 FBDIMM (7.1)
    HDD: 1x300GB VelociRaptor (5.9)
    GPU: eVGA 7300GT (4.7/4.3)
    youve got 16gb ddr2 667?

    as for win7 needing a qaud core and lots of memory, to max out the benchmark yes, but they designed win7 to use less resources than vista, and if i can run vista on a old acer travelmate 2480 1.73ghz celeron m 2gb ram then i think it will have alot of flexibility for older systems

    i still wanna see a cpu of 7.9....common ppl!! lol
    Last edited by rickvtv6; 01-23-2009 at 06:09 AM.


    zalman cnps9700-led cooler|quad sli leadtek 9800gx2 fan100%|asus xonar d2x|seagate 40ns 1tb 32mb|zalman zm-mfc2 fan+watt monitor|zalman zm850-hp psu|cooler master centurion 590|logitech dinovo edge,mx revolution,mx air,g25,b/tooth n/pad|chimei 1680x1050 22" W/SCREEN 2MS DVI
    42" panasonic plasma HDMI|windows 7 ultimate beta 7000 x64
    ||3dmark06:20,187 e8400@4.22 vista x64 1876fsb||
    ||3dmark06:20,561 q9550@4.01 win7x32b7000 1883fsb||

  11. #86
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    122
    i managed to get an extra .1 point for gaming graphics by using the classic theme and disabling visual affects! now my whole system will run faster! lol

    i wonder how much of an improvement other ppl will get by doing the same?

    i think even if i o.c. to 4ghz i wont see any more than 7.5 if im lucky for cpu.
    Last edited by rickvtv6; 01-24-2009 at 10:15 AM.


    zalman cnps9700-led cooler|quad sli leadtek 9800gx2 fan100%|asus xonar d2x|seagate 40ns 1tb 32mb|zalman zm-mfc2 fan+watt monitor|zalman zm850-hp psu|cooler master centurion 590|logitech dinovo edge,mx revolution,mx air,g25,b/tooth n/pad|chimei 1680x1050 22" W/SCREEN 2MS DVI
    42" panasonic plasma HDMI|windows 7 ultimate beta 7000 x64
    ||3dmark06:20,187 e8400@4.22 vista x64 1876fsb||
    ||3dmark06:20,561 q9550@4.01 win7x32b7000 1883fsb||

  12. #87
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,430
    Quote Originally Posted by Warboy View Post
    I went from 15xxx to 22xxx with my upgrades, So whats your point about seeing less then 20% increase?

    My GTX 280 outperforms my 8800GTX OC2 in SLI. That I sold. lol.
    Lol I think you have to have a Dual newer cards. I'm still getting 6.0 and I upgraded to a GTX 285 OC.

  13. #88
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    122
    there we go 4.00ghz scored me a 7.5 for cpu, im satisfied with that...for now, i wonder if a can hit 4.22 like my old e8400, check out my cpu voltage tho, i had to increase it a bit, 3.5 was about the best i could do at the stock 1.25v im quite impressed considering all other volts are set to auto apart from forcing the ddr3 to 1.90v

    Screen01.JPG



    zalman cnps9700-led cooler|quad sli leadtek 9800gx2 fan100%|asus xonar d2x|seagate 40ns 1tb 32mb|zalman zm-mfc2 fan+watt monitor|zalman zm850-hp psu|cooler master centurion 590|logitech dinovo edge,mx revolution,mx air,g25,b/tooth n/pad|chimei 1680x1050 22" W/SCREEN 2MS DVI
    42" panasonic plasma HDMI|windows 7 ultimate beta 7000 x64
    ||3dmark06:20,187 e8400@4.22 vista x64 1876fsb||
    ||3dmark06:20,561 q9550@4.01 win7x32b7000 1883fsb||

  14. #89
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    177
    All my clocks are stock.

    Here's the raw numbers:

    Code:
    - <WinSPR>
      <SystemScore>5.9</SystemScore> 
      <MemoryScore>5.9</MemoryScore> 
      <CpuScore>7.2</CpuScore> 
      <CPUSubAggScore>6.8</CPUSubAggScore> 
      <VideoEncodeScore>7.1</VideoEncodeScore> 
      <GraphicsScore>7.9</GraphicsScore> 
      <Dx9SubScore>6</Dx9SubScore> 
      <Dx10SubScore>6.5</Dx10SubScore> 
      <GamingScore>6.5</GamingScore> 
      <StdDefPlaybackScore>TRUE</StdDefPlaybackScore> 
      <HighDefPlaybackScore>TRUE</HighDefPlaybackScore> 
      <DiskScore>5.9</DiskScore> 
    - <LimitsApplied>
    - <MemoryScore>
      <LimitApplied Friendly="Physical memory available to the OS is less than 4.0GB on 64-bit OS - limit mem score to 5.9" Relation="LT">4294967296</LimitApplied> 
      </MemoryScore>
      </LimitsApplied>
      </WinSPR>
    - <Metrics>
    - <CPUMetrics>
      <CompressionMetric units="MB/s">256.00941</CompressionMetric> 
      <EncryptionMetric units="MB/s">135.23427</EncryptionMetric> 
      <CPUCompression2Metric units="MB/s">502.33175</CPUCompression2Metric> 
      <Encryption2Metric units="MB/s">1024.63266</Encryption2Metric> 
      <CompressionMetricUP units="MB/s">63.24123</CompressionMetricUP> 
      <EncryptionMetricUP units="MB/s">33.69238</EncryptionMetricUP> 
      <CPUCompression2MetricUP units="MB/s">125.40216</CPUCompression2MetricUP> 
      <Encryption2MetricUP units="MB/s">256.93234</Encryption2MetricUP> 
      <DshowEncodeTime units="s">3.34586</DshowEncodeTime> 
      </CPUMetrics>
    - <MemoryMetrics>
      <Bandwidth units="MB/s">10640.02203</Bandwidth> 
      </MemoryMetrics>
    - <GamingMetrics>
      <BatchFps DXVersion="9" units="F/s" score="6.0">940.91998</BatchFps> 
      <AlphaFps DXVersion="9" units="F/s" score="6.0">938.28998</AlphaFps> 
      <TexFps DXVersion="9" units="F/s" score="6.0">313.82999</TexFps> 
      <ALUFps DXVersion="9" units="F/s" score="6.0">383.70001</ALUFps> 
      <BatchFps DXVersion="10" units="F/s" score="6.9">928.29999</BatchFps> 
      <AlphaFps DXVersion="10" units="F/s" score="5.9">914.48999</AlphaFps> 
      <TexFps DXVersion="10" units="F/s" score="6.6">300.28000</TexFps> 
      <ALUFps DXVersion="10" units="F/s" score="5.3">332.01001</ALUFps> 
      <GeomF4 DXVersion="10" units="F/s" score="6.5">38.08000</GeomF4> 
      <GeomF27 DXVersion="10" units="F/s" score="6.9">61.70000</GeomF27> 
      <GeomV8 DXVersion="10" units="F/s" score="6.8">98.05000</GeomV8> 
      <GeomV32 DXVersion="10" units="F/s" score="6.8">40.93000</GeomV32> 
      <CBuffer DXVersion="10" units="F/s" score="6.9">628.34003</CBuffer> 
      </GamingMetrics>
    - <GraphicsMetrics>
      <DWMFps units="F/s">470.77100</DWMFps> 
      <VideoMemBandwidth units="MB/s">24911.70000</VideoMemBandwidth> 
      <MFVideoDecodeDur units="s">1.19580</MFVideoDecodeDur> 
      </GraphicsMetrics>
    - <VideoDecodeMetrics>
      <DecodeFrameCount Width="1920" Height="1080" ExpectedFrameCount="300">287</DecodeFrameCount> 
      <DecodeFrameCount Width="1920" Height="1080" ExpectedFrameCount="150">151</DecodeFrameCount> 
      <DecodeFrameCount Width="720" Height="480" ExpectedFrameCount="300">293</DecodeFrameCount> 
      <DecodeFrameCount Width="720" Height="480" ExpectedFrameCount="150">147</DecodeFrameCount> 
      <DecodeFrameCount Width="1920" Height="1080" ExpectedFrameCount="150">151</DecodeFrameCount> 
      <DecodeFrameCount Width="720" Height="480" ExpectedFrameCount="300">151</DecodeFrameCount> 
      </VideoDecodeMetrics>
    - <DiskMetrics>
      <AvgThroughput kind="Sequential Read" units="MB/s" ioSize="65536" score="6.4">91.16500</AvgThroughput> 
      <AvgThroughput kind="Random Read" units="MB/s" ioSize="16384" score="3.4">1.38000</AvgThroughput> 
      <MeanLatency Kind="Read With Sequential Background Writes" units="us" score="5.8">5679</MeanLatency> 
      <MaxLatency Kind="Read With Background Writes" units="us" percentile="95" score="5.4">12474</MaxLatency> 
      <MaxLatency Kind="Read With Background Writes" units="us" percentile="100" score="7.8">65433</MaxLatency> 
      <MeanLatency Kind="Read With Random Background Writes" units="us" score="5.8">5499</MeanLatency> 
      </DiskMetrics>
    Attached Images Attached Images

  15. #90
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    234
    Here it is
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Asus P5Q Deluxe (P5QD1406) || Q9400 at 3.4GHz || 2x2GB Mushkin Redline PC2-8000 || HIS HD 4870 1GB w/ Scythe Musashi (silent) || 501GB Samsung HD || Zalman ZM850-HP || Antec P182 || Windows 7 x64 RTM

  16. #91
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    569
    Windows7 Perf index is the crappiest benchmark score I've ever seen! I overclocked my Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 2600MHz up to ~3200MHz and got the same index 5.8 for the CPU. LOL!

  17. #92
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    122
    Quote Originally Posted by VVJ View Post
    Windows7 Perf index is the crappiest benchmark score I've ever seen! I overclocked my Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 2600MHz up to ~3200MHz and got the same index 5.8 for the CPU. LOL!
    if you look at my screen shot i score 7.5 with my q9550 @4ghz, at stock 2.83ghz it gets 7.3.

    there are a couple lucky ppl on this thread with intels new i7 chipsets, mildly overclocked that are just about at 7.9, put 2 and 2 together and you get 4 but the point is that its got better and newer cpu's in mind for the benchmark side of win7 so you cant max out the cpu with something as brilliant as an intel e2140 pentium d/core or 2gb of ddr2 667 or a nvidia 7600gs

    get what im sayin? it wil take the latest and greatest and maybe thensome to tie this snake in a knot.



    zalman cnps9700-led cooler|quad sli leadtek 9800gx2 fan100%|asus xonar d2x|seagate 40ns 1tb 32mb|zalman zm-mfc2 fan+watt monitor|zalman zm850-hp psu|cooler master centurion 590|logitech dinovo edge,mx revolution,mx air,g25,b/tooth n/pad|chimei 1680x1050 22" W/SCREEN 2MS DVI
    42" panasonic plasma HDMI|windows 7 ultimate beta 7000 x64
    ||3dmark06:20,187 e8400@4.22 vista x64 1876fsb||
    ||3dmark06:20,561 q9550@4.01 win7x32b7000 1883fsb||

  18. #93
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,080
    I get 6.0 with gaming and HDD being the lowest....
    This new rating system blows, seems geared toward SSD and future GPU's...hell even Quad SLI ain't getting 7.9
    I have two 74GB VelociRaptors in RAID 0 and only get 6.0?????????...i think this new ratings system is designed to last for a few hardware cycles and not to be rendered obsolete or maxed out by the next gen card or HDD...
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Richard Dower; 01-27-2009 at 02:30 AM.
    Gigabyte EP45-DQ6 - rev 1.0, F13a bios | Intel Q9450 Yorkfield 413x8=3.3GHz | OCZ ProXStream 1000W PSU | Azuen X-Fi Prelude 64MB X-RAM| WD VelociRaptor 74HLFS-01G6U0 16MB cache 74GB - 2 drive RAID 0 64k stripe | ASUS 9800GT Ultimate 512MB RAM (128 SP!!) | G.SKILL PC2-8800 4GB kit @ 1100MHz | OCZ ATV Turbo 4GB USB flash | Scythe Ninja Copper + Scythe 120mm fan | BenQ M2400HD 24" 16:9 LCD | Plextor 716SA 0308; firmware 1.11 | Microsoft Wireless Entertainment Desktop 8000 | Netgear RangeMax DG834PN 108mbps; firmware 1.03.39 + HAWKING HWUG1 108mbps USB dongle | Digital Doc 5+ | 7 CoolerMaster 80mm blue LED fans | Aopen H700A tower case | Vista Home Premium - 32bit, SP1

  19. #94
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,080
    I think the iCore 7's are doing well as it must be related to calculations per second etc. and the fact it's 8-core multithreaded. My memory is 1100MHz, but i bet if had had 6GB or 8GB installed the score would go up.
    Last edited by Richard Dower; 01-27-2009 at 02:33 AM.
    Gigabyte EP45-DQ6 - rev 1.0, F13a bios | Intel Q9450 Yorkfield 413x8=3.3GHz | OCZ ProXStream 1000W PSU | Azuen X-Fi Prelude 64MB X-RAM| WD VelociRaptor 74HLFS-01G6U0 16MB cache 74GB - 2 drive RAID 0 64k stripe | ASUS 9800GT Ultimate 512MB RAM (128 SP!!) | G.SKILL PC2-8800 4GB kit @ 1100MHz | OCZ ATV Turbo 4GB USB flash | Scythe Ninja Copper + Scythe 120mm fan | BenQ M2400HD 24" 16:9 LCD | Plextor 716SA 0308; firmware 1.11 | Microsoft Wireless Entertainment Desktop 8000 | Netgear RangeMax DG834PN 108mbps; firmware 1.03.39 + HAWKING HWUG1 108mbps USB dongle | Digital Doc 5+ | 7 CoolerMaster 80mm blue LED fans | Aopen H700A tower case | Vista Home Premium - 32bit, SP1

  20. #95
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    177
    Can you guys post your raw metrics?

    Like I know my memory bandwidth is 10.6 GB/s, and if it wasn't for the

    <LimitApplied Friendly="Physical memory available to the OS is less than 4.0GB on 64-bit OS - limit mem score to 5.9" Relation="LT">4294967296</LimitApplied>

    I would probably have higher.

  21. #96
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    122
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Dower
    I get 6.0 with gaming and HDD being the lowest....
    This new rating system blows, seems geared toward SSD and future GPU's...hell even Quad SLI ain't getting 7.9
    I have two 74GB VelociRaptors in RAID 0 and only get 6.0?????????...i think this new ratings system is designed to last for a few hardware cycles and not to be rendered obsolete or maxed out by the next gen card or HDD...
    JESUS! what have i been trying to say here about future designing!? thankyou for repointing this out maybe other ppl will realize your post more than mine(s) and think..hey that persons right thats why i cant max out this bench with a 486dx2/66 (but its overclocked!)?????

    quad sli from my experience was a huge waste of dough, if i knew the gtx series was soo close at the time i would have waited. i was surprised i hit 6 to be honest.

    howd u get a high score with 4gb ram? i got 5.5?? i really need 6gb cos i got the quad sli which is total of 2gb vddr3 it leaves me with 2gb, then 1gb for Win7 and 1gb or less for gaiming then its relying on my crappy scoring big 1tb 7000rpm page file lol
    Last edited by rickvtv6; 01-27-2009 at 05:18 AM.


    zalman cnps9700-led cooler|quad sli leadtek 9800gx2 fan100%|asus xonar d2x|seagate 40ns 1tb 32mb|zalman zm-mfc2 fan+watt monitor|zalman zm850-hp psu|cooler master centurion 590|logitech dinovo edge,mx revolution,mx air,g25,b/tooth n/pad|chimei 1680x1050 22" W/SCREEN 2MS DVI
    42" panasonic plasma HDMI|windows 7 ultimate beta 7000 x64
    ||3dmark06:20,187 e8400@4.22 vista x64 1876fsb||
    ||3dmark06:20,561 q9550@4.01 win7x32b7000 1883fsb||

  22. #97
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    122
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestrider View Post
    Can you guys post your raw metrics?

    Like I know my memory bandwidth is 10.6 GB/s, and if it wasn't for the

    <LimitApplied Friendly="Physical memory available to the OS is less than 4.0GB on 64-bit OS - limit mem score to 5.9" Relation="LT">4294967296</LimitApplied>

    I would probably have higher.
    how do yo do that?


    zalman cnps9700-led cooler|quad sli leadtek 9800gx2 fan100%|asus xonar d2x|seagate 40ns 1tb 32mb|zalman zm-mfc2 fan+watt monitor|zalman zm850-hp psu|cooler master centurion 590|logitech dinovo edge,mx revolution,mx air,g25,b/tooth n/pad|chimei 1680x1050 22" W/SCREEN 2MS DVI
    42" panasonic plasma HDMI|windows 7 ultimate beta 7000 x64
    ||3dmark06:20,187 e8400@4.22 vista x64 1876fsb||
    ||3dmark06:20,561 q9550@4.01 win7x32b7000 1883fsb||

  23. #98
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    335
    Quote Originally Posted by rickvtv6 View Post
    JESUS! what have i been trying to say here about future designing!? thankyou for repointing this out maybe other ppl will realize your post more than mine(s) and think..hey that persons right thats why i cant max out this bench with a 486dx2/66 (but its overclocked!)?????
    so true lol

  24. #99
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,440
    6 gb of DDR 3 running at my stock 1600 = 7.9. 3 gb ddr3 at 2000mhz 8,8,8,21 = 6. Speed is secondary to amount.
    HDD score is going off access times, so SSD or low score. Probably need OS on ram to get 7.9.
    gaming graphics pcie 2 and dual gpu minimum.

    It it just scanning for new tech, not necessarily speed of hardware.

  25. #100
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    177
    Quote Originally Posted by rickvtv6 View Post
    how do yo do that?
    C:\Windows\Performance\WinSAT\DataStore\

    Then go to your most recent Formal.Assessment

Page 4 of 13 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •