AMD Phenom II 920 & 940 Full Review

[Chad Boga]

it was more of the pentium 4 as a whole.

Very few people seem to think the C2D owes more of it's architecture to P4, than it does to P3.

[cegras]

After 20 pages, I've come to the conclusion that Zucker was never impartial in the first place.

And, just to be on topic - yay, Phenom II sucks! Let's go buy Core i -- wait, I want a new gfx card.

[roofsniper]

Very few people seem to think the C2D owes more of it's architecture to P4, than it does to P3.

it was more of inbetween but the fact i was trying to get a across was who thought slapping two laptop cpus together would make a good desktop dual core and then slapping those same two together to make a good desktop quad. pretty much the core 2 quad is made out of laptop chips from six years ago yet somehow it turned out well. anyway lets lay off this topic and just wait until they got more info reviewed on phenom II here.

[Dante80]

I'm sorry, noone cares about Pentium M or how revolutionary core2 was/is. This is a Phenom II review/benchmark thread...

Hoping for more number crunching...I think we will have some more soon...

ps: Έλα μωρή Ελλαδαρα!!!...XD

[STEvil]

Thread locked, this the final lock and any users who offend in the next thread will receive a ban.