Page 12 of 33 FirstFirst ... 2910111213141522 ... LastLast
Results 276 to 300 of 807

Thread: *HOT* | Corsair DOMINATOR GT | 6GB (3x2GB) | DDR3-2000 7-8-7-20 @ 1.65V | *HOT*

  1. #276
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    2,310
    Quote Originally Posted by eva2000 View Post
    no need Andre just show me super pi 32m at those clocks with CPU VTT 1.4v and 1.53v vdimm will be enough to prove your point

    But yeah everyone knows higher mem clocks = more CPU VTT needed








  2. #277
    Admin
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,225
    lol...careful whenever you ask Andre to prove something.

  3. #278
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    1,383
    hmm theres one thing i want to add about uncore
    on cooling .. theres something to do with idle/load difference or something else

    this was the result at 200bclk ram at 1600mhz ioh at 1.24v ich at 1.24v HT OFF

    intel stock
    3.8ghz 1.182v memtest hci stable 5000% 1.6v set for uncore 4000

    true+CM 90cfm
    4ghz 1.3v memtest hci stable 5000% 1.58v set for uncore 4000

    coolifreezone elite
    4.2ghz 1.352 memtech hci stable 5000% 1.48-1.5v for uncore 4000

    same proc.
    still dont get it why. multi?? unknown temp factor??

    thermal paste application exactly the same
    polish with as5 and smoothen with tx2 on proc and heatsink

    just wanted to share

  4. #279
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    cstkl1, better cooled cpu will also help better memory clocks but could be the balance needed between vcore, cpu vtt and vdimm - need more folks to investigate heh

    very nice Andre, my cpu ain't as good can't handle DDR3-2008Mhz 7-8-7-20 1T at 1.4v CPU VTT

    ---

  5. #280
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    127
    Quote Originally Posted by eva2000 View Post
    cstkl1, better cooled cpu will also help better memory clocks but could be the balance needed between vcore, cpu vtt and vdimm - need more folks to investigate heh

    very nice Andre, my cpu ain't as good can't handle DDR3-2008Mhz 7-8-7-20 1T at 1.4v CPU VTT

    Can you run memory on this settings with voltage less then 1.64?
    CPU: i7 930 3002A648 (Venomous X+Ultra Kaze 2000rpm)
    MB: Asus P6X58D Premium Bios 1501
    Video: Saphire HD 5970
    Memory: Corsair Dominator TR3X6G1600C8D @ 1600MHz
    X-Fi Extreme Gamer Fatality Pro
    HDD: Vertex 2 100GB+WD Caviar Black 1Tb
    Case: TT Kandalf LCS Silver
    Power: CM Real Power Pro 1000W
    Display: Samsung 275T
    Input: Logitech G25/G15/G500/Z-2300

  6. #281
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    Quote Originally Posted by Kimofil View Post
    Can you run memory on this settings with voltage less then 1.64?
    nope but haven't played with other voltages and well it all depends on cpu mem controller
    ---

  7. #282
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,123
    Quote Originally Posted by AndreYang View Post





    Those are really good results. Can you do that with an i7 920? The MSR tables could be setup differently depending on the memory multiplier, so the read/write leveling, clock skew delay/advances, and a whole host of other items that are setup dynamically at POST are subject to change.

    How does it do with an actual load on it? I can pass 32m all day at those VTT/VCore rates on the Corsair, but once you start encoding a 1080P clip with Cyberlink Power Director 7, converting a 24MP image in Photoshop CS4, modifying a AVCHD clip in Adobe Premiere Pro CS4, or playing Crysis, it is BSOD time. Hence, the higher rates to ensure stability in actual application testing, not a program barely stressing one core and less than 50% of the memory.

    In the end it really does not matter what program, CPU model, or settings are used. The quality of the IMC is going to determine just how well the memory performs at each gate. I could use a crappy 965XE or 920 we have here and claim Corsair's latest GT 2000 kit is unable to hit 2000, much less 1600 at rated specifications. Would it be fair, no, but it is the truth in this case. The truth if you consider this particular 920 will not do more 3.6GHz stable, even at 1.50 VCore and memory refuses to go higher than 1520, regardless of VDimm/VTT/Ratio.

    I just think people need to realize this up front when we are discussing results with memory products on the i7 platform, otherwise, there are going to be some very upset customers when their latest $600 memory kit will not do what is advertised or they push VTT so high that they are arguing with Intel for RMA approval.
    Last edited by bingo13; 02-07-2009 at 09:10 AM.

  8. #283
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    2,310
    Quote Originally Posted by bingo13 View Post
    Those are really good results. Can you do that with an i7 920? The MSR tables could be setup differently depending on the memory multiplier, so the read/write leveling, clock skew delay/advances, and a whole host of other items that are setup dynamically at POST are subject to change.

    How does it do with an actual load on it? I can pass 32m all day at those VTT/VCore rates on the Corsair, but once you start encoding a 1080P clip with Cyberlink Power Director 7, converting a 24MP image in Photoshop CS4, modifying a AVCHD clip in Adobe Premiere Pro CS4, or playing Crysis, it is BSOD time. Hence, the higher rates to ensure stability in actual application testing, not a program barely stressing one core and less than 50% of the memory.

    In the end it really does not matter what program, CPU model, or settings are used. The quality of the IMC is going to determine just how well the memory performs at each gate. I could use a crappy 965XE or 920 we have here and claim Corsair's latest GT 2000 kit is unable to hit 2000, much less 1600 at rated specifications. Would it be fair, no, but it is the truth in this case. The truth if you consider this particular 920 will not do more 3.6GHz stable, even at 1.50 VCore and memory refuses to go higher than 1520, regardless of VDimm/VTT/Ratio.

    I just think people need to realize this up front when we are discussing results with memory products on the i7 platform, otherwise, there are going to be some very upset customers when their latest $600 memory kit will not do what is advertised or they push VTT so high that they are arguing with Intel for RMA approval.



    hehehe....I don't have i7 920 for testing.

    In fact, my 965 IMC is not bad at all. I just prove I can use VTT 1.4V for sure. 1.69V VTT is only for 2200+ CL7 testing.

  9. #284
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    217
    That's a nice summary of the current state of Intel hardware. And you are right about impending consumer wrath when they begin to understand. My issue with the GT kit not being able to run cas 7 @2000Mhz on my BloodRage isn't because of a substandard imc or any ram problem. I tried 4 different chips, two of which are much better than average (3841Axxx). Maybe Corsair will have to include an asterisk with their adds that specify which boards are capable of running at those timings assuming you have a decent chip. Oh well, my DFI doesn't suffer with this kit. If only I could change the color...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG00007.jpg 
Views:	1217 
Size:	178.0 KB 
ID:	94348   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	one.jpg 
Views:	1195 
Size:	99.9 KB 
ID:	94349  
    tripgood

    Big hardware pile

  10. #285

  11. #286

  12. #287

  13. #288
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    yeah heat could be a factor when stressed with high CPU VTT

    DFI System Temp = PWM temp
    DFI Chipset Temp = NB temp

    blend

    ---

  14. #289
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    1,383
    eva here is one more funny thing

    hx1000 vs op1000 ( not the e version..the previous long EPS)
    corsair dominator 1600 C8
    dram set 1.65 both in bios
    Stable Clocks
    op1000 7-8-7-20 1T
    hx1000 8-8-8-24
    probe reports the same 1.648v

    weird aint it.
    but then that op1000 had killed a few rams before including a am3 900 C3 1N.
    hmmm

    testing now with da1200 and pcp750

  15. #290
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    weird i'm using HX1000 right now with my DFI UT X58-T3EH8

    I'll be setting up my DFI JR X58-T3H6 with OP1200 though
    ---

  16. #291

  17. #292
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,123
    Quote Originally Posted by AndreYang View Post
    hehehe....I don't have i7 920 for testing.

    In fact, my 965 IMC is not bad at all. I just prove I can use VTT 1.4V for sure. 1.69V VTT is only for 2200+ CL7 testing.
    Actually, your IMC is great.

  18. #293

  19. #294

  20. #295
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    59
    I heard a rumor that the barbs for the optional watercooling blocks are made of aluminum. Is this correct and if so can they be easily swapped out?

  21. #296
    Corsair Rep
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,203
    Quote Originally Posted by nelsoncp21 View Post
    I heard a rumor that the barbs for the optional watercooling blocks are made of aluminum. Is this correct and if so can they be easily swapped out?
    No this is not correct. They are nickel plated brass.
    Yes, Yellowbeard, a tall rough man with a big yellow beard

  22. #297
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    59
    awesome. I thought it would be odd. thanks.

  23. #298
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    298
    First screenshot with the GT:

    i7 3960X@5ghz, Asus Rampage IV Extreme, 8gb Gskill RipjawsZ PC19200C8, Corsair force GT 240go, 2XGTX Titan, MM Ascension, Seasonic X-serie Gold 1250W, Watercooling

    i7 3930K@5ghz, Asus Rampage IV Extreme, 8gb Gskill RipjawsZ PC17000C9, OCZ Vertex 3 120go, GTX670 DCU2 Top, MM Pinnacle, Corsair AX850, Watercooling

  24. #299
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Terra
    Posts
    337
    Quote Originally Posted by bachus_anonym View Post
    There are no "hidden costs". During checkout, there will be sales tax or VAT added to your total, plus shipping costs. Your credit card company takes it from there and applies currency exchange rate.
    I just received my hot ramm, they got even hotter when the ups delivery person said i had to pay a additional 106,90 euros tax
    I had no idea about this, since i had payed tax for it allready which had been added to the price of my ramm...
    my total expences makes a total of 660 euros = 917 dollars..........


    first time i ever ordered something from abroad, it would have been nice tho if there was information about extra costs for people outside the US..
    maybe i can get some tax back, have to check....
    Last edited by AceBaran; 02-10-2009 at 06:40 AM.
    Apple MacBook Air
    Apple IPad 2

  25. #300
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    298
    same here already send PM to Bachus and corsair website!
    i7 3960X@5ghz, Asus Rampage IV Extreme, 8gb Gskill RipjawsZ PC19200C8, Corsair force GT 240go, 2XGTX Titan, MM Ascension, Seasonic X-serie Gold 1250W, Watercooling

    i7 3930K@5ghz, Asus Rampage IV Extreme, 8gb Gskill RipjawsZ PC17000C9, OCZ Vertex 3 120go, GTX670 DCU2 Top, MM Pinnacle, Corsair AX850, Watercooling

Page 12 of 33 FirstFirst ... 2910111213141522 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •