Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
Current: AMD Threadripper 1950X @ 4.2GHz / EK Supremacy/ 360 EK Rad, EK-DBAY D5 PWM, 32GB G.Skill 3000MHz DDR4, AMD Vega 64 Wave, Samsung nVME SSDs
Prior Build: Core i7 7700K @ 4.9GHz / Apogee XT/120.2 Magicool rad, 16GB G.Skill 3000MHz DDR4, AMD Saphire rx580 8GB, Samsung 850 Pro SSD
Intel 4.5GHz LinX Stable Club
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
So it's i5, I wonder why it's not i6 though, higher is better for marketing unless there's space left between for future (lowend die shrinked chip for instance). I have no problem with it being dual channel, makes it easier for me to pick RAM => 2x2GB. So what are the planned SKU's for i5 you think, what will be the highest clocked part at launch? 3GHz? Don't tell me all will be so low clocked like this ES here. I want at least a 3.8GHz clock to satisfy from upgrading from a C2D CPU and I don't expect these low clocked SKUs like this ES to reach that (on air 24/7 stable).
Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs
If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place
Hmmm, have you not read the specifications of i5 ?
We 're talking about a quad core processor which means in case you mess with video editing, rendering and generally multi-threaded applications (or if you play GTA IV the worst game ever optimizing-wise ), then you are going to be glad for that upgrade
Higher performance, with less wattage than kentsfields/yorkfields ...
Greater clock per clock performance
I'm out ...
Now the question is do you GTA4?
Waiting like 8 months just to get it cheaper is kinda, well, retarded 45nm was more or less fine, it was like 2 months in between 45nm QX and dual cores. But more than half year, no way.
mATX, hmm, not for me - vga with accelero S1 (with 120mm fan) + xfi card is already 4 slots
...
Yea I think so too, but 2.83GHz part is fine as long as it clocks to 3.7~3.8GHz on air and price is sub 300 EUR which I'm sure it is as it's quite a while until Lynnfield launch still and i7 920 2.66GHz is sub 300 EUR so 2.83GHz i5 I'd really expect to at least match the one step lower clocked i7 920 in price by then. Hope we can expect to see such overclocks though, I have a feeling they'll come close in average to like 3.5 ~ 3.7GHz but not quite 3.8GHz other than on golden samples or going very excessive on cpu voltage.
Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 12-09-2008 at 07:43 AM.
Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs
If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
Originally Posted by Movieman
qft!Posted by duploxxx
I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
Posted by gallag
there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
Blauhung did substantiate the Lynnfield OC woes rumors somewhat, so who knows. If it turns out it does overclock it should be a great buy, triple channel is quite pointless. PCI-E on-die is also way cool.
uhh no thanks. Not a fan of microATX boards, and the lack of PCIe channels could be a real problem, as more stuff (slowly it seems) moves from PCI to PCIe. Oh and define "cheap" because it seems one person's "cheap" is another persons "pricey" or somewhere in between or whatever. A solid number would be helpful.
That prototype board is hideously ugly and bare, but I'm assuming being a prototype the final product would be a bit more filled out?
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
I'm wondering how 3D performance will compare to X58--someone should do a single-card comparison (x16 slot) and a taped-off SLI and CFX (x8-x8) comparison. Same clock speed, dual-channel memory, but how's performance with on-die PCIe?
Anyways--looks interesting. If I get the money, I'll probably go for i7 though.
My toys:
Asus Sabertooth X58 | Core i7-950 (D0) | CM Hyper 212+ | G.Skill Sniper LV 12GB DDR3-1600 CL9 | GeForce GTX 670-2048MB | OCZ Agility 4 512GB, WD Raptor 150GB x 3 (RAID0), WD Black 1TB x 2 (RAID0) | XFX 650W CAH9 | Lian-Li PC-9F | Win 7 Pro x86-64
Gigabyte EX58-UD3R | Core i7-920 (D0) | Stock HSF | G.Skill Sniper LV 4GB DDR3-1600 CL9 | Radeon HD 2600 Pro 512MB | WD Caviar 80GB IDE, 4TB x 2 (RAID5) | Corsair TX750 | XClio 188AF | Win 7 Pro x86-64
Dell Dimension 8400 | Pentium 4 530 HT (E0) | Stock HSF | 1.5GB DDR2-400 CL3 | GeForce 8800 GT 256MB | WD Caviar 160GB SATA | Stock PSU | (Broken) Stock Case | Win Vista HP x86
Little Dot DAC_I | Little Dot MK IV | Beyerdynamic DT-880 Premium (600 Ω) | TEAC AG-H300 MkIII | Polk Audio Monitor 5 Series 2's
The only point in waiting is for revisions and bug fixes. Also as time passes the prices always seem to go down as well Sometimes waiting is a good idea if you don't absolutely NEED a new setup. If you can do what you need to with your current rig there's really no need to step it up.
If anyone is interested in fitness and/or nutrition hit me up if you'd like advice getting your girlish figure back I'm nearing 10 years of experience, how time flies.
Oh my god this thread is moving beyond fast lol...
If anyone is interested in fitness and/or nutrition hit me up if you'd like advice getting your girlish figure back I'm nearing 10 years of experience, how time flies.
My toys:
Asus Sabertooth X58 | Core i7-950 (D0) | CM Hyper 212+ | G.Skill Sniper LV 12GB DDR3-1600 CL9 | GeForce GTX 670-2048MB | OCZ Agility 4 512GB, WD Raptor 150GB x 3 (RAID0), WD Black 1TB x 2 (RAID0) | XFX 650W CAH9 | Lian-Li PC-9F | Win 7 Pro x86-64
Gigabyte EX58-UD3R | Core i7-920 (D0) | Stock HSF | G.Skill Sniper LV 4GB DDR3-1600 CL9 | Radeon HD 2600 Pro 512MB | WD Caviar 80GB IDE, 4TB x 2 (RAID5) | Corsair TX750 | XClio 188AF | Win 7 Pro x86-64
Dell Dimension 8400 | Pentium 4 530 HT (E0) | Stock HSF | 1.5GB DDR2-400 CL3 | GeForce 8800 GT 256MB | WD Caviar 160GB SATA | Stock PSU | (Broken) Stock Case | Win Vista HP x86
Little Dot DAC_I | Little Dot MK IV | Beyerdynamic DT-880 Premium (600 Ω) | TEAC AG-H300 MkIII | Polk Audio Monitor 5 Series 2's
Forget about overclocking Havendale/Lynnfield same as Bloomfield. It's different here since BCLK is routed (and controlled) a different way......
No thanks , i will pass , LGA775 FTW ....
Intel Core I7 920 @ 3.8GHZ 1.28V (Core Contact Freezer)
Asus X58 P6T
6GB OCZ Gold DDR3-1600MHZ 8-8-8-24
XFX HD5870
WD 1TB Black HD
Corsair 850TX
Cooler Master HAF 922
Its perfect for people like me who wont upgrade this year, doesnt need many slots (M-ATX is enough), wont ever use more than 1 video card, and does not need much Bandwidth (dual channel is more than enough for games and most common apps).
I would like to see M-ATX going mainstream big time, while ATX being more of an workstation/enthusiast solution
Are you sure it's not the same FUD that was spread prior to i7 launch? I thought Intel's take is that motherboard manufacturers have to decide whether to enable or disable overclocking features. In fact I expect i5 to be just a lower binned i7, when it comes to overclocking.
Originally Posted by freecableguy
Bookmarks