Page 1 of 9 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 210

Thread: Intel Core i5 Performance

  1. 12-08-2008, 10:42 PM #1
    sxs112
    sxs112 is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    882
    Send a message via MSN to sxs112 Send a message via Yahoo to sxs112

    Intel Core i5 Performance

















    CHIPHELL
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 12-08-2008, 10:50 PM #2
    Metroid
    Metroid is offline
    Xtreme Monster
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,182
    Nice. It looks like The performance is similar to I7.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 12-08-2008, 10:53 PM #3
    SNiiPE_DoGG
    SNiiPE_DoGG is offline
    Engineering The Xtreme
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    7,217
    Send a message via AIM to SNiiPE_DoGG Send a message via MSN to SNiiPE_DoGG Send a message via Skype™ to SNiiPE_DoGG
    is this the one that's locked so there is no overclocking??
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 12-08-2008, 11:08 PM #4
    Vozer
    Vozer is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    228
    Wow, Lynnfield is Intel Core i5!

    I guess Havendale will be Core i3 then.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 12-08-2008, 11:10 PM #5
    Mumak
    Mumak is offline
    HWiNFO Author
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    801
    Can u run latest beta of HWiNFO32 (http://www.hwinfo.com) there? It should already fully support this platform.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 12-08-2008, 11:23 PM #6
    Glow9
    Glow9 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    how do these perform compared to last gen? I'm kinda curious if they are even worth it besides the OC potential.
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 12-09-2008, 12:02 AM #7
    BulldogPO
    BulldogPO is offline
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Finland, Eura
    Posts
    1,744
    Send a message via MSN to BulldogPO
    Is there OC potential if thy are locked?


    http://mato78.com - Finnish PC Hardware news & reviews
    BulldogPO @ Twitter

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 12-09-2008, 12:54 AM #8
    kl0012
    kl0012 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,366
    Seems like all that FUD about "locked overclocking" starts again. I don't get it - how can CPU lock clock generator which is an external chip placed on motherboard.
    Last edited by kl0012; 12-09-2008 at 01:04 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 12-09-2008, 01:22 AM #9
    renzokuken
    renzokuken is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    114
    Would be awesome to have an i7/i5 comparison benchmark



    Case: Coolermaster CM690 OS: Windows XP x64 edition / Windows Vista x64 Optical: Asus DRW-1814BLT, LG GDR8164B Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3 (rev 2.1) Monitors: Dual GDM-5410 21" RAM: Corsair XMS2 4GB (2 x 2GB) DDR2 800, 5-4-3-12 Processor: E2140 (M0) @ 3.2ghz/1.3825v (set in BIOS) PSU: Enermax EG565P-VE FMA (24P) 535W ATX2.01 PSU Videocard: Galaxy 512mb 8800GT @ 675/1674/1100 (Samsung 1.0ns) Cooling: Xigmatek HDT-S1283, Accelero S1 Rev. 2 + 2x 120mm Coolermaster fan Storage: Western Digital Raptor 74gb (WD740GD-00FLA2), Seagate 750gb (ST3750630AS)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 12-09-2008, 01:34 AM #10
    WhiteFireDragon
    WhiteFireDragon is offline
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    @ the computer
    Posts
    2,510
    Send a message via AIM to WhiteFireDragon
    wow first time i've seen i5. is it same tech as i7, except only 4 threads?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 12-09-2008, 01:34 AM #11
    R101
    R101 is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    519
    Who wants to bet against i9 being the 8-core/16-thread version?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 12-09-2008, 01:34 AM #12
    saveus222
    saveus222 is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    403
    my e4600 does 1m in 18 seconds.. does that mean its faster than this processor ? curious and clueless
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 12-09-2008, 01:37 AM #13
    Shintai
    Shintai is offline
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Lynnfield can OC like Bloomfield. Please lets not have the idiotic talk like with i7 before release. Where alot of sites and people was shown to have produced alot of FUD.

    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteFireDragon View Post
    wow first time i've seen i5. is it same tech as i7, except only 4 threads?
    No, its 100% identical to bloomfield, 4 cores, 8 threads (With HT). Besides only having dualchannel. Also instead of QPI to X58. You have ondie PCIe.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 12-09-2008, 01:37 AM #14
    SNiiPE_DoGG
    SNiiPE_DoGG is offline
    Engineering The Xtreme
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    7,217
    Send a message via AIM to SNiiPE_DoGG Send a message via MSN to SNiiPE_DoGG Send a message via Skype™ to SNiiPE_DoGG
    this proc is running at 2.2ghz and Spi 1m is a single thread clockspead bench
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 12-09-2008, 01:54 AM #15
    Nedjo
    Nedjo is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,550
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post

    No, its 100% identical to bloomfield, 4 cores, 8 threads (With HT). Besides only having dualchannel. Also instead of QPI to X58. You have ondie PCIe.
    screens a re showing 6GB of RAM... that only makes sense with tri-channel...

    what's main difference between Bloomfield and Linnfield besides socket?
    Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 12-09-2008, 01:57 AM #16
    Shintai
    Shintai is offline
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Nedjo View Post
    screens a re showing 6GB of RAM... that only makes sense with tri-channel...

    what's main difference between Bloomfield and Linnfield besides socket?
    Because 2x1GB and 2x2GB is so impossible? (And look at CPU-Z..channels..DUAL)

    Read the difference above...

    Lynnfield prototype board:

    Last edited by Shintai; 12-09-2008 at 01:59 AM.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 12-09-2008, 02:00 AM #17
    strange|ife
    strange|ife is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Vegas ,NV
    Posts
    1,636
    Send a message via AIM to strange|ife
    weak in regard to the cpu

    nice write up though, gotta show off all the goods
    ~
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 12-09-2008, 02:02 AM #18
    Nedjo
    Nedjo is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,550
    timeframe? Q3 2K9?
    Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 12-09-2008, 02:10 AM #19
    leomax
    leomax is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    102
    Memory config 4G+2G dual channel ddr3 1066.

    Power source: 135W 19.5V 6.9A notebook AC Adapter
    Thats interesting.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 12-09-2008, 02:26 AM #20
    STaRGaZeR
    STaRGaZeR is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    CPU： Intel Lynnfield 2.13G
    内存： 笔记本的DDR3-1066 （4G+2G）
    硬盘： 笔记本的ST 7200.2 160G （ATA模式）
    显卡： PCI-E X1 的 NVS290
    电源： 135W 19.5V 6.9A 笔记本AC Adapter
    OS： Vista U 64bit
    Just in case anybody that has not read the link decides to ask already answered questions...
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  21. 12-09-2008, 02:59 AM #21
    Macadamia
    Macadamia is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lansing, MI / London / Stinkaypore
    Posts
    1,788
    Sounds like a good stock CPU to put in "Chinese Sweatshop" environments and render for me.
    Quote Originally Posted by radaja View Post
    so are they launching BD soon or a comic book?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  22. 12-09-2008, 04:58 AM #22
    Vinas
    Vinas is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,785
    Quote Originally Posted by saveus222 View Post
    my e4600 does 1m in 18 seconds.. does that mean its faster than this processor ? curious and clueless
    Yes and no. You're running at 2.4GHz stock and this CPU is 2.13GHz so clock for clock your CPU is probably still a bit slower. Also the i5 has 4 cores (via hyperthreading) where you only have 2.
    Last edited by Vinas; 12-09-2008 at 05:01 AM.
    Current: AMD Threadripper 1950X @ 4.2GHz / EK Supremacy/ 360 EK Rad, EK-DBAY D5 PWM, 32GB G.Skill 3000MHz DDR4, AMD Vega 64 Wave, Samsung nVME SSDs
    Prior Build: Core i7 7700K @ 4.9GHz / Apogee XT/120.2 Magicool rad, 16GB G.Skill 3000MHz DDR4, AMD Saphire rx580 8GB, Samsung 850 Pro SSD
    Intel 4.5GHz LinX Stable Club
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  23. 12-09-2008, 05:09 AM #23
    Shintai
    Shintai is offline
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Vinas View Post
    Yes and no. You're running at 2.4GHz stock and this CPU is 2.13GHz so clock for clock your CPU is probably still a bit slower. Also the i5 has 4 cores (via hyperthreading) where you only have 2.
    8 via hypertheading
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  24. 12-09-2008, 05:33 AM #24
    eva2000
    eva2000 is offline
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    nice.. thought you had a typo in thread title at first hehe

    thanks for sharing
    ---
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  25. 12-09-2008, 05:34 AM #25
    kiwi
    kiwi is offline
    xtreme energy
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Europe, Latvia
    Posts
    4,145
    Send a message via MSN to kiwi Send a message via Skype™ to kiwi
    Intel is smart, sell as much i7 as possible till Q3 2009 and only then release i5 If you crave nehalem no point waiting really. I highly doubt i5 will have much higher clocks, if it did then it would be worth
    ...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 1 of 9 1234 ... LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules