Page 18 of 51 FirstFirst ... 81516171819202128 ... LastLast
Results 426 to 450 of 1265

Thread: AMD Shanghai/Deneb Review Thread

  1. #426
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    They kept the HT link somewhat high, maybe that was why they saw cold boot issues. Guess they haven't been reading at XS...

  2. #427
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
    Posts
    464
    Quote Originally Posted by lo squartatore View Post
    VERY IMPORTANT !!!!!!!!!!!

    Excuseme, but this Phenom II that we have seen by IOCEDMYSELF and SOF ....is it a Engineering sample or retail cpu ???????
    I suspect someone thinks the world revolves around them.

    Why's it so important? Because you want to know?

  3. #428
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    North Augusta, SC USA
    Posts
    448
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostbuster View Post
    Look what THG brought in We Overclock Phenom II to 4.9GHz plus result (SuperPi)

    Wow, talk about not RESPECTING NDA!!! I thought the lift wasn't until Friday. I hope AMD takes them off their Elite list and never send then products to review again. Hardcore folks don't visit Toms anyway.

  4. #429
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by lo squartatore View Post
    because if it's a sample can be selected by AMD for overclock and the retail will be lower
    OR they are earlier stepping that clock a bit slower than those shipping in January (retail chips)

    Could be both

  5. #430
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    North Augusta, SC USA
    Posts
    448
    Did anyone notice Toms claim the Denebs have problems at -70 degrees? IIRC, didn't others run Denebs at -200 Degrees and lower?

  6. #431
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by Throwed View Post
    Did anyone notice Toms claim the Denebs have problems at -70 degrees? IIRC, didn't others run Denebs at -200 Degrees and lower?
    Evidence suggests, and AMD recommends, that extreme clocking requires HT at 1000 or lower. Once it is set lower, you can go -180 and beyond. Only a noob reviewer, you know one who does not read XS, would set the HT at 1800 while trying to hit an extreme OC with LN.
    Phenom 9950BE (125w) 3.2 ghz| ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe | 4 Gig Corsair XMS2 (DDR2 800 Mhz) | NV 8800 GTS 512 (G92) | SATA2: 2-SGTE 350; 2-WD 250 | SeaSonic M12 SS-700HM| Apogee GTZ; MCP355; Feser 240 | Creative X-Fi Xtremegamer | VISTA 32-bit |

  7. #432
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    498
    AMD Phenom II 940 and AMD Phenom II 940 3.80Ghz Benchmarks

    http://www.gameware.ir/phenom2/

    AMD Phenom II

    In these tables Phenom II 940 3800 OC means its has been overclocked from x15 multiplier to x19.
    the temp of the CPU was low (avg. 50) with ZALMAN 9700NT fan.
    at last you shhould know that we have Mainboard problems!
    the best overclocked figure of this CPU is with SB750 South Birdge but because this CPU do not have bios support from any MainBoard corps,
    we could'nt overclock it as maximum as it can support!
    But the CPU was stable at 4200MHZ with ZALMAN 9700NT fan, unfortunately we could'nt install any OS with the mainboard Biostar Tforce TA790GX A2
    and these benchmark that we attached was taken with M3A32-MVP Deluxe in GameWare Labs
    we try to overclock this CPU using Biostar, Jetway, DFI to have SB750 South Bridge but each of them have various problems. (most of them had bios problem)
    Hmm... Legit?
    Faceman


  8. #433
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by Face View Post
    AMD Phenom II 940 and AMD Phenom II 940 3.80Ghz Benchmarks

    http://www.gameware.ir/phenom2/



    Hmm... Legit?
    Well, I have seen stable overclocks posted on XS for Gigabyte, ASUS, and Foxconn. I know my ASUS board bios has been updated for Deneb. And some are preferring it for extreme oc. So....
    Phenom 9950BE (125w) 3.2 ghz| ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe | 4 Gig Corsair XMS2 (DDR2 800 Mhz) | NV 8800 GTS 512 (G92) | SATA2: 2-SGTE 350; 2-WD 250 | SeaSonic M12 SS-700HM| Apogee GTZ; MCP355; Feser 240 | Creative X-Fi Xtremegamer | VISTA 32-bit |

  9. #434
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by Jazzman View Post
    Well, I have seen stable overclocks posted on XS for Gigabyte, ASUS, and Foxconn. I know my ASUS board bios has been updated for Deneb. And some are preferring it for extreme oc. So....
    Well, what do you know; the chip was stable at 4.2Ghz, but they couldn't install an OS? So how did they know it was stable?

  10. #435
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    746
    I like the 35% increase in crysis, 19% increase in Unreal tournament 3 and 39% increase in farcry 2 frame rates but I wonder what settings those were at.

    Also wonder how the northbridge speed increase will effect gaming.

  11. #436
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    North Augusta, SC USA
    Posts
    448
    Quote Originally Posted by Zucker2k View Post
    Well, what do you know; the chip was stable at 4.2Ghz, but they couldn't install an OS? So how did they know it was stable?
    Good question, but the thing you still have to take into account is that they used AIR and it POSTED at 4.2Ghz. If the CPU post that high and allows the user to go into the BIOS settings without getting a "Black Screen" means you can expect that dropping it to a 3.8-4Ghz will easily allow the system to install an OS. Which IMO is AWESOME from a stock clocked 3Ghz CPU.

    Since I have been overclocking I have noticed one factor. If it post at XGhz then dropping it to 200Mhz slower than XGhz usually gives a stable system.

  12. #437
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,755
    Quote Originally Posted by lo squartatore View Post
    VERY IMPORTANT !!!!!!!!!!!
    Excuseme, but this Phenom II that we have seen by IOCEDMYSELF and SOF ....is it a Engineering sample or retail cpu ???????
    Would you please stop being an annoyance and quit using those big fonts and flashy colors every now and then?
    Thank you.
    Crosshair IV Formula
    Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.7G
    6950~>6970 @ 900/1300
    4 x 2G Ballistix 1333 CL6
    C300 64G
    Corsair TX 850W
    CM HAF 932

  13. #438
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    North Augusta, SC USA
    Posts
    448
    Quote Originally Posted by LowRun View Post
    Would you please stop being an annoyance and quit using those big fonts and flashy colors every now and then?
    Thank you.
    Yeah, I agree. Some people don't seem to get it. The Eng samples usually have Eng Sample listed in the CPU Z screen shot; however, the retail CPU's DON'T. With the slew of overclocked CPU Z screen shots already posted should give this guy a ball park figure of what to expect from the Deneb retail chips. As it stands he's.....

  14. #439
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    498
    AMD Phenom II X4 940 (3GHz) outperforms Intel QX9770 (3.2GHz) in 3Dmark Vantage; lost 9% to core i7

    In 3Dmark Vantage, the Phenom II X4 940 (Deneb) running on ASRock AOD790GX/128M with 2GB DDR2-1066 scored P7240. On a core i7 system, the same HD 4850 scored P7766 while on a Intel P45 board ASRock P45XE-WiFiN with QX9770, it scored 7112. Looks like the Phenom II X4 940 (3GHz) is able to outperform the QX9770 in this test whereas Intel Core i7 still outperform the Phenom II X4 3GHz by over 9%.
    http://my.ocworkbench.com/bbs/showth...597#post441597
    Faceman


  15. #440
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    lo squartatore i dont think that its fake "it may be idk", but if you mean that PhII is not better than a QX9770 that is.

    QX9770 may be a very good and expensive monster but as it is i7 920 is cheaper than QX9770 and still outperforms it in every thing. The reason why PhII performs better is that it was suppose to be better clock to clock with Penryn but how good is a quad Penryn vs QX9770 clock to clock in this benchmark???

    Also as for the i7 they dont even say which one lets assume they were talking about the 920 that confused me a bit. According to them it scored around P7891 but i was sure that because of the i7's fake cores this score would be more!!!
    Last edited by ajaidev; 12-16-2008 at 12:45 PM.

  16. #441
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Birmingham AL.
    Posts
    1,079
    Quote Originally Posted by lo squartatore View Post
    FAKE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    the sample Deneb C0 was +10% to Agena in Crysis and +8% in Quake wars in clock to clock, with bios and RAM lower.
    The ultimate platform must be highter and is not possible that it's better to2-3%, IT's FAKE !


    QX9770 vs Deneb 940 better ?
    FAKE is not possible.
    damn your obnoxious we will know the truth real soon. that wont be the last we hear of that comparison
    Last edited by G0ldBr1ck; 12-16-2008 at 12:43 PM.

  17. #442
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    KCMo
    Posts
    256
    Quote Originally Posted by lo squartatore View Post
    anadtech is pro intel but is not most corrupt .
    Quote Originally Posted by Jazzman View Post
    Evidence suggests, and AMD recommends, that extreme clocking requires HT at 1000 or lower. Once it is set lower, you can go -180 and beyond. Only a noob reviewer, you know one who does not read XS, would set the HT at 1800 while trying to hit an extreme OC with LN.
    Anyone with ANY K10 excperience knows you under-clock the HT Link to increase the CPU speed. Intelophile's just don't get it -never have, probably never will ...
    .
    Opteron 180 @ 2.8 GHz || A8N32-SLI || 2x 1Gb Corsair 3500LL Pro || 7900 GTX || Tt 680W PurePower
    MCP655 > Storm > MCW60 > 3/4" T-line > MCP655 > Storm (Opty 165) > 2-302 HC w/2x 140CFM Deltas

    Latest Toy: 940BE || M3A32-MVP || Corsair TwinX2048-6400C4D || OCZ Stealth 600W

  18. #443
    Xtremely Bad Overclocker
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    East Blue
    Posts
    3,596
    Quote Originally Posted by Throwed View Post
    Wow, talk about not RESPECTING NDA!!! I thought the lift wasn't until Friday. I hope AMD takes them off their Elite list and never send then products to review again. Hardcore folks don't visit Toms anyway.
    QFT! that sucks really - I want to show my screen so that everybody can see that they are nubs...I can do half a second better at same speed
    additionally - they use LN2 and 1.7V for that?????? jeez' 1.55V and air is all you need for that
    Quote Originally Posted by hipro5
    hahaha I do it all on air
    exactly!!! (this is an old comment of our greek friend I will never forget... )
    Last edited by SoF; 12-16-2008 at 01:00 PM.
    | '12 IvyBridge - "ticks different"... | AwardFabrik IvyBridge round I by SoF | AwardFabrik IvyBridge round II by angoholic & stummerwinter
    | '11 The SandyBridge madness... | AwardFabrik / Team LDK OC-Season 2011/2012 Opening Event
    | '10 Gulftown LaunchDay OC round up @ASUS RIIE | 3DM05 2x GPU WR LIVE @Cebit 2010 @ASUS MIIIE | SandyBridge arrived @ASUS P8P67

    | '09 Foxconn Avenger | E8600 | Foxconn A79A-S | Phenom II 940 BE | LaunchDay Phenom II OC round up
    | '08 7.438s 1m LN2 | AMD 1m WR LN2 | 2nd AOCM | Phenom II teasing
    | '07 100% E2140 | 106.5% E2160 | 100% E4500 | 103% E4400 | 5508 MHZ E6850 | 7250 MHZ P4 641 126.5% by SoF and AwardFabrik Crew all on Gigabyte DS3P c? and LN2...
    | '06 3800+ X2 Manchester 0531TPEW noHS 3201MHZ c? | 3200+ Venice noHS 3279MHZ c? | Opteron 148 0536CABYE 3405MHZ c? all on Gigabyte K8NXP-SLI compressorcooled

    | '05 3500+[NC], 3000+[W], 2x 3200+[W], 3500+[NC], 3200+[V] 0516GPDW

    Quote Originally Posted by saaya
    sof pulled a fermi on all of us !!!

  19. #444
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    North Augusta, SC USA
    Posts
    448
    Quote Originally Posted by SoF View Post
    QFT! that sucks really - I want to show my screen so that everybody can see that they are nubs...I can do half a second better at same speed
    additionally - they use LN2 and 1.7V for that?????? jeez' 1.55V and air is all you need for that
    Well, in three days you can show everyone here at XS how much of a joke Tomshardware is. Hell, many already know this though. Glad to see you respecting the NDA. I am sure it has been difficult with so much attention the Denebs are drawing.



    For all the obvious Intel folk trying to defend Intel in a AMD thread/section........
    RELAX!!!! Forget the speculation!! Friday, there should be a slew of trusted reviews out.

  20. #445
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Space
    Posts
    769
    Quote Originally Posted by SoF View Post
    QFT! that sucks really - I want to show my screen so that everybody can see that they are nubs...I can do half a second better at same speed
    additionally - they use LN2 and 1.7V for that?????? jeez' 1.55V and air is all you need for that

    exactly!!! (this is an old comment of our greek friend I will never forget... )

    Firday?

  21. #446
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    KCMo
    Posts
    256
    Quote Originally Posted by lo squartatore View Post
    jaja don't dream !
    phenom is lower than Penryn clock to clock.

    lower score in vanatge and better score total ???? OCW is not good source and it's not possible.
    Penryn? What's a Penryn?? Is that some kind of cold weather aquatic fowl ...???
    .
    Opteron 180 @ 2.8 GHz || A8N32-SLI || 2x 1Gb Corsair 3500LL Pro || 7900 GTX || Tt 680W PurePower
    MCP655 > Storm > MCW60 > 3/4" T-line > MCP655 > Storm (Opty 165) > 2-302 HC w/2x 140CFM Deltas

    Latest Toy: 940BE || M3A32-MVP || Corsair TwinX2048-6400C4D || OCZ Stealth 600W

  22. #447
    Xtremely Bad Overclocker
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    East Blue
    Posts
    3,596
    friday is unsure for me. It is a lot harder than I thought to keep results for oneself, can't wait for the day to end it
    | '12 IvyBridge - "ticks different"... | AwardFabrik IvyBridge round I by SoF | AwardFabrik IvyBridge round II by angoholic & stummerwinter
    | '11 The SandyBridge madness... | AwardFabrik / Team LDK OC-Season 2011/2012 Opening Event
    | '10 Gulftown LaunchDay OC round up @ASUS RIIE | 3DM05 2x GPU WR LIVE @Cebit 2010 @ASUS MIIIE | SandyBridge arrived @ASUS P8P67

    | '09 Foxconn Avenger | E8600 | Foxconn A79A-S | Phenom II 940 BE | LaunchDay Phenom II OC round up
    | '08 7.438s 1m LN2 | AMD 1m WR LN2 | 2nd AOCM | Phenom II teasing
    | '07 100% E2140 | 106.5% E2160 | 100% E4500 | 103% E4400 | 5508 MHZ E6850 | 7250 MHZ P4 641 126.5% by SoF and AwardFabrik Crew all on Gigabyte DS3P c? and LN2...
    | '06 3800+ X2 Manchester 0531TPEW noHS 3201MHZ c? | 3200+ Venice noHS 3279MHZ c? | Opteron 148 0536CABYE 3405MHZ c? all on Gigabyte K8NXP-SLI compressorcooled

    | '05 3500+[NC], 3000+[W], 2x 3200+[W], 3500+[NC], 3200+[V] 0516GPDW

    Quote Originally Posted by saaya
    sof pulled a fermi on all of us !!!

  23. #448
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    EvE-Online, Tranquility
    Posts
    1,978
    Quote Originally Posted by lo squartatore View Post
    jaja don't dream !
    phenom is lower than Penryn clock to clock.

    lower score in vanatge and better score total ???? OCW is not good source and it's not possible.
    Dude, if I read one more fail troll from you Im certainly stepping up from ROFL'ing here for 2 hours. It was funny, but it's getting highly annoying now
    Synaptic Overflow

    CPU:
    -Intel Core i7 920 3841A522
    --CPU: 4200Mhz| Vcore: +120mV| Uncore: 3200Mhz| VTT: +100mV| Turbo: On| HT: Off
    ---CPU block: EK Supreme Acetal| Radiator: TCF X-Changer 480mm
    Motherboard:
    -Foxconn Bloodrage P06
    --Blck: 200Mhz| QPI: 3600Mhz
    Graphics:
    -Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
    --GPU: 750Mhz| GDDR: 900Mhz
    RAM:
    -3x 2GB Mushkin XP3-12800
    --Mhz: 800Mhz| Vdimm: 1.65V| Timings: 7-8-7-20-1T
    Storage:
    -3Ware 9650SE-2LP RAID controller
    --2x Western Digital 74GB Raptor RAID 0
    PSU:
    -Enermax Revolution 85+ 1250W
    OS:
    -Windows Vista Business x64


    ORDERED: Sapphire HD 5970 OC
    LOOKING FOR: 2x G.Skill Falcon II 128GB SSD, Windows 7

  24. #449
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Spain (Valencia) - UK (Manchester)
    Posts
    81
    But Soft, do you know when the dna is going off??
    lo squartatore, intel forum is under this one, I'm sure that there you'll be like at home .

  25. #450
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by SoF View Post
    friday is unsure for me. It is a lot harder than I thought to keep results for oneself, can't wait for the day to end it
    You shouldn't stress yourself, it's bad for your health
    Why wait till friday?

    Anyway, web is getting flooded with all kinds of results (fake or not), might be a good idea to cut to the chase

    @lo squartatore (or should i say ripper? ) this is not Intel forum
    Last edited by Jerry Rob; 12-16-2008 at 02:11 PM.

Page 18 of 51 FirstFirst ... 81516171819202128 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •