Anyone know something about this, or is it fake?
Anyone know something about this, or is it fake?
probably a fake seeing as we're wayy past batch L820
06? Aren't the new High Quads this year? First thing that comes to mind is Q9950 2.83Ghz. The Q9850 is 3.6Ghz is quite a Mhz boost. Do you have the chip or did you just find the pic?
i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.
If I had the chip I wouldn't be asking now would I? I got the pic from techpowerup, they are puzzled too, so I thought of asking here...Originally Posted by Glow9
and the chips are always stamped with the year of the architecture right?
Proven fake by a batch search (on OCN).
Not always.
I suspect this is a fake. Considering that they don't even have an EX chip that high. AND the disparity b/t it and the Q9650. I would think that it would be 3.33ghz, following the typical clock speed/naming system.
"Never skimp on the Power Supply" -Me
Core i7 920 D0 B-batch (4.1) (Kinda Stable?) | DFI X58 T3eH8 (Fed up with its' issues, may get a new board soon) | Patriot 1600 (9-9-9-24) (for now) | XFX HD 4890 (971/1065) (for now) |
80GB X25-m G2 | WD 640GB | PCP&C 750 | Dell 2408 LCD | NEC 1970GX LCD | Win7 Pro | CoolerMaster ATCS 840 {Modded to reverse-ATX, WC'ing internal}
CPU Loop: MCP655 > HK 3.0 LT > ST 320 (3x Scythe G's) > ST Res >Pump
GPU Loop: MCP655 > MCW-60 > PA160 (1x YL D12SH) > ST Res > BIP 220 (2x YL D12SH) >Pump
Look at the bottom half of the 8 in 9850; it's smaller than the top half of the 8, in other words not proportional. Looks like it could have been tampered with? And why would a 9850 model be 3.60GHz, when the increase from 9450->9550->9650 is only half a multiplier, 8->8,5->9?
Obsolescence be thy name
i wish they would release a penryn quad with 10X multi though
Intel is already retracting current QX's, so to promoted the Core i7 EE 965. Fake.
My toys:
Asus Sabertooth X58 | Core i7-950 (D0) | CM Hyper 212+ | G.Skill Sniper LV 12GB DDR3-1600 CL9 | GeForce GTX 670-2048MB | OCZ Agility 4 512GB, WD Raptor 150GB x 3 (RAID0), WD Black 1TB x 2 (RAID0) | XFX 650W CAH9 | Lian-Li PC-9F | Win 7 Pro x86-64
Gigabyte EX58-UD3R | Core i7-920 (D0) | Stock HSF | G.Skill Sniper LV 4GB DDR3-1600 CL9 | Radeon HD 2600 Pro 512MB | WD Caviar 80GB IDE, 4TB x 2 (RAID5) | Corsair TX750 | XClio 188AF | Win 7 Pro x86-64
Dell Dimension 8400 | Pentium 4 530 HT (E0) | Stock HSF | 1.5GB DDR2-400 CL3 | GeForce 8800 GT 256MB | WD Caviar 160GB SATA | Stock PSU | (Broken) Stock Case | Win Vista HP x86
Little Dot DAC_I | Little Dot MK IV | Beyerdynamic DT-880 Premium (600 Ω) | TEAC AG-H300 MkIII | Polk Audio Monitor 5 Series 2's
lol if any of you guys bothered to check the cpu S-Spec you'd realise it was fake straight away, SLB8W is Q9650 E0 stepping.
DFI LT-X48-T2R UT CDC24 Bios | Q9550 E0 | G.Skill DDR2-1066 PK 2x2GB |
Geforce GTX 280 729/1566/2698 | Corsair HX1000 | Stacker 832 | Dell 3008WFP
It looks like a bad photoshop to me... The 8 is more blurred/text looking.
Fake .. have you ever seen this?
ASUS P5K PREMIUM
INTEL Q6600 @3.7Ghz, Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme, Silverstone FM 123
Crucial Ballistix PC6400 @578Mhz 2*2Gb, 5-5-5-15 T2
XFX XXX 8800 GTX 650/1550/2000
2x Seagate 7200.11 500Gb RAID 0
PC Power & Colling Silencer 750Watt
how do you connect the card lol
i guess if its tesla maybe they dont really need display ports on all but master card
![[XC] gomeler's Avatar](image.php?s=349372faf64be259eeeccc8bdbc43b12&u=17665&dateline=1215408777 "[XC] gomeler's Avatar")
Isn't Tesla meant to be a CUDA crunching machine, not a GPU?
Look at the name on the top of the heatsink Dinos... it doesnt need VGA/DVI/etc connectors
Heatware || 01.01.08; AND 111.2%
Dead Z7S-WS? Click!. || XS Z7S-WS Thread || Current Dead Asus Z7S-WS count: 26+ ($15,000 in dead motherboards).
All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
Want to use my Anti-asus logo? Go ahead, but use this link please!: http://i853.photobucket.com/albums/a...sus/noasus.gif
Bring back the game. http://reclaimyourgame.com/. EA are mean.
yeah i know
i did mention the fact it's a Tesla card
it was funny during last Nvidia editors day when they launched these cards (GTX280s) and CEO made a smartass remark to his team about falling just short of 1 TLOP cards hehehe
and then someone jumped in and said ...... WEEEEEELLL Tesla cards are 1 TFLOP cards
http://www.nvidia.com/object/tesla_c1060.html
its right there ;> no display outputs, they probably use a quadro or the likes as a master.
edit: err since they emulate cpu functionality that would be the case.
Last edited by mikeyakame; 11-11-2008 at 09:01 PM.
DFI LT-X48-T2R UT CDC24 Bios | Q9550 E0 | G.Skill DDR2-1066 PK 2x2GB |
Geforce GTX 280 729/1566/2698 | Corsair HX1000 | Stacker 832 | Dell 3008WFP
that chip has to be a fake. first of all, 3.6ghz is way too high for a quad at stock speed. there's no way a quad will have a higher clock than the fastest dual core. second, they wouldn't put efforts to produce another quad when core i7 currently only has 3 choices
Posting Permissions
