Again, you are oversimplifying the arguement.
Never at any time have I ever said that the OC potential was the most important factor for getting a video card.
That would be absurd for me to say!
My arguement has always centered around the fact that OC potential can have a significant impact on performance.
The GTX 260 216 and the HD 4870 1GB perform similarly in most titles, yet the former usually has a higher OC potential than the latter.
The GTX 260 216 for instance can be made to rival or surpass the performance of a stock GTX 280 fairly easily; a card that costs up to 150 dollars extra.
Why scoff at such potential?
No it doesn't contradict my claim.But you also say that in certain circumstances the 4870 is still stronger. That alone contradicts your very one claims.
You just want to deal in absolutes, when there are none; at least where this is concerned..
There are scenarios where the HD 4870 will outperform the GTX 260 (and vice versa) regardless of overclocking.
For example, Devil May Cry 4 runs very well on the RV770 architecture, and no amount of overclocking on the GTX 260 will make up such a gap.
Also, if you use 8xAA, then the RV770 will have an edge.
However, for most games, both cards perform similarly to each other (within a few percentage points), thus overclocking potential does have an impact assuming you want the highest level of attainable performance..
Bookmarks