Correct me if I'm wrong, but you contradict yourself. If the clothing was bigger, then they (they in this instance being women, but it might as well be unisex) would think they were
losing weight, not the other way around.
BTW, the whole clothing industry is shot for sizing - some countries (and I'm not gonna say who but it shouldn't be too hard to figure out) waistlines have been rapidly expanding leading to an increase of the sizes. A 34 today, is not the same 34 it was 10 years ago. Plus you would never had had such things as 'relaxed fit' , 'loose fit' , 'comfort fit' and so on.
Being a clothing buyer is a nightmare as one vendor's 34 can be another vendor's 32 33 or 34. Or even 36. There is no conformity amongst sizing in clothes, regardless of where clothing is produced.
Sadly, this overweight problem has slowly spread thought the world and it's getting harder and harder to point the finger at one culprit country anymore. I'm blaming the rise of the Golden Arches, 500 channel tv's and frapicino's myself, but I'm sure obesity can be attributed to a whole range of factors. . .
ON TOPIC- this is not newsworthy and should be moved
Bookmarks