Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: which pump for which loop

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    27

    which pump for which loop

    Hi, i'm currently setting up 2 loops, one will have ek-supreme, thermochill pa120.0, ek-nb s-max. The other one will have 2 x ek-fc4870, swiftech mcr220 and both will have an ek res and using 1/2" tubing.

    I have 2 pumps, mcp355 and mcp655 and i'm wondering which pump to use with which loop. I've heard that the ek-supreme waterblock is a bit restrictive so i'm wondering if i should use the mcp655 or will that be overkill? and instead use it for the 2 gpus.
    Corsair Obsidian 800D
    Q6600 G0 @ 3.6 GHz (450 x 8) 1.44V
    Asus x48 Rampage Formula
    2 x 2GB G.Skill F2-8500@ 1200 MHz
    ATI HD5850 @ 1000/1200 MHz

  2. #2
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Imperial Palace, UDE of Pitatopia
    Posts
    8,396
    If you have a top for the 355, that should go on the CPU loop.

    655 on a Supreme is like going Elephant hunting with a paintball gun, all your going to do is annoy the Elephant.
    Circles SucQ!

    If your annoyed by sigs telling you to put things in your sig, then put this in your sig

    Bribery won't work on me...just say NO to AT!!!

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    889
    Quote Originally Posted by Waterlogged View Post
    If you have a top for the 355, that should go on the CPU loop.

    655 on a Supreme is like going Elephant hunting with a paintball gun, all your going to do is annoy the Elephant.
    Wait, im confused. Isnt the MCP655 (D-5) a lot better than the MCP355? I think it is. Id use the 655 on the CPU and the 355 on the GPU's. Also, I probably consider switching the rads, using a little less restrictive rad for the EK Supreme, although it really wont make all that much of a diff.

    Just a quick tip, Im using the GT Stealth 240 and 120 (needed some thinner rads) and they LOVE high CFM's. I know BI says they are optimized for low flow fans, but I dont see it.
    Intel 8700k
    16GB
    Asus z370 Prime
    1080 Ti
    x2 Samsung 850Evo 500GB
    x 1 500 Samsung 860Evo NVME


    Swiftech Apogee XL2
    Swiftech MCP35X x2
    Full Cover GPU blocks
    360 x1, 280 x1, 240 x1, 120 x1 Radiators

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    San Antonio, Tx.
    Posts
    760
    That depends on if he has a replacement top for the 355. With the aftermarket tops on the 355, the 355 has much better head pressure than the 655. And the Supreme needs alot of hea... uhm pressure to work at it's best. But if it has the stock top, with it's 3/8" barbs, then yes, the 655 is better.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    239
    Quote Originally Posted by Waterlogged View Post
    If you have a top for the 355, that should go on the CPU loop.

    655 on a Supreme is like going Elephant hunting with a paintball gun, all your going to do is annoy the Elephant.
    LOL that was great

    -sponge

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    889
    Quote Originally Posted by Big_Daddy View Post
    That depends on if he has a replacement top for the 355. With the aftermarket tops on the 355, the 355 has much better head pressure than the 655. And the Supreme needs alot of hea... uhm pressure to work at it's best. But if it has the stock top, with it's 3/8" barbs, then yes, the 655 is better.
    Head pressure changes with the size of tubing/barbs used, correct? I know the stats claims the 355 has a higher head than the 655 but thats measured with 3/8" barbs. Wouldnt the pressure decrease going to 1/2" barbs?

    I would also guess that the 3/8" conversion kit with the 655 would greatly increase its head pressure as well?

    I guess this is where Matrinm210 comes in with one of his ever helpfull graphs.
    Intel 8700k
    16GB
    Asus z370 Prime
    1080 Ti
    x2 Samsung 850Evo 500GB
    x 1 500 Samsung 860Evo NVME


    Swiftech Apogee XL2
    Swiftech MCP35X x2
    Full Cover GPU blocks
    360 x1, 280 x1, 240 x1, 120 x1 Radiators

  7. #7
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Imperial Palace, UDE of Pitatopia
    Posts
    8,396
    Quote Originally Posted by StAndrew View Post
    Head pressure changes with the size of tubing/barbs used, correct? I know the stats claims the 355 has a higher head than the 655 but thats measured with 3/8" barbs. Wouldnt the pressure decrease going to 1/2" barbs?

    I would also guess that the 3/8" conversion kit with the 655 would greatly increase its head pressure as well?

    I guess this is where Matrinm210 comes in with one of his ever helpfull graphs.
    Not as much as you'd think. I once did a test with a CSP-Mag (weak pump, I know), but between 1/2 I.D. tubing and 3/8 I.D. tubing, I only got roughly a 1/8" variation.
    Circles SucQ!

    If your annoyed by sigs telling you to put things in your sig, then put this in your sig

    Bribery won't work on me...just say NO to AT!!!

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    27
    hi thanks for the replies, i'm planning on using the petrastech ddct top with the mcp355 or the ek ddc x-top
    Corsair Obsidian 800D
    Q6600 G0 @ 3.6 GHz (450 x 8) 1.44V
    Asus x48 Rampage Formula
    2 x 2GB G.Skill F2-8500@ 1200 MHz
    ATI HD5850 @ 1000/1200 MHz

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •