Ugh well I have real temp set at 95 TJmax for my Q66. Unless someone says else I am just going off that.
Ugh well I have real temp set at 95 TJmax for my Q66. Unless someone says else I am just going off that.
~ Little Slice of Heaven ~
Lian Li PC-A05NB w/ Gentle Typhoons
Core i7 860 @ 3gHz w/ Thor's Hammer
eVGA P55 SLI
8GB RAM
Gigabyte 7970
Corsair HX850
OZC Vertex3 SSD 240GB
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Knowing Intel they might just remove it again with WestmereOriginally Posted by The Coolest
Heh, actually I doubt that.Knowing Intel they might just remove it again with Westmere
It looks like they moved the main temp monitoring to the DTS. It's readings can even be seen in the bios (at least of some boards).
They improved the accuracy and the operating range of the DTS. Hopefully it's going to be on par or better than the 65nm DTS.
Member of Overclockers.com Folding @ Home team
"<The_Coolest> you can't unwaste wasted CPU cycles" - Start FOLDing now!
Main rig:
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X / Mobo: Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 500GB + WD Blue 250GB + HDD / GPU: Dell RX 570 4GB / Mem: 2x16GB DDR4-3200 G.Skill 32GTZKW TridentZ - 32GB total / PSU: Seasonic Prime Ultra Gold 650W
Secondary rigs:
Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.3GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Mobo: Biostar TP67XE / 2x Inland Pro 120GB / GPU: HD5450 / Mem: 4x4GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 8GBXL RipJawsX - 16GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W.
Core i3 540 3.06GHz @ 4.0GHz (Freezer 7 Pro) / Mobo: MSI H55M-ED55 / GPU: Integrated / Mem: 4x2GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBRL RipJaws - 8GB total / PSU: Antec 380W.
Core Temp - Accurate temperature monitor for Intel's Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors
Interesting, this will require an overhaul of most motherboard manufacturer utilities then, since they usually just read the "CPU" temperature.
Edit: Typos
Last edited by randomizer; 12-09-2008 at 01:20 AM.
Definitively. They are starting to treat the HW monitoring seriously. Watch out for new platforms based on IbexPeak
yay! thankyou Intel!
Case: Coolermaster CM690 OS: Windows XP x64 edition / Windows Vista x64 Optical: Asus DRW-1814BLT, LG GDR8164B Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3 (rev 2.1) Monitors: Dual GDM-5410 21" RAM: Corsair XMS2 4GB (2 x 2GB) DDR2 800, 5-4-3-12 Processor: E2140 (M0) @ 3.2ghz/1.3825v (set in BIOS) PSU: Enermax EG565P-VE FMA (24P) 535W ATX2.01 PSU Videocard: Galaxy 512mb 8800GT @ 675/1674/1100 (Samsung 1.0ns) Cooling: Xigmatek HDT-S1283, Accelero S1 Rev. 2 + 2x 120mm Coolermaster fan Storage: Western Digital Raptor 74gb (WD740GD-00FLA2), Seagate 750gb (ST3750630AS)
another confirmation of the impossible... 30ºC ambient and 30ºC on first and second cores (no to mention 25ºC 27ºC for the other two lasting cores)... this is with the 90ºC tJMax and a Q6600 G0 @ 1.336v 3.2Ghz... i find this amusing
X5650 - TRUE120 - P6TD DELUXE (@P6T WS PRO 1205 (mod) Bios) - 3x8GB KINGSTON HyPERX @1760MHz (8-9-8-25-1T) - EVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC2 iCX - Seasonic X-850 - Samsung 850 512G - ACER Predator XB271HU - Dell SX2210
100C is the right TjMAX for 65nm quads... If intel have said 105C, I would believe it... But anything less then 100C is bullsh/t...
Yet it sucks as hard as the stock one and I would only recommend it at max 3.6Ghz opsyep they do, the QX9770 uses the same cooler als the QX9650. And the cooler is hughe compared to the stock Qxxxx cooler.
Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved
Remark : They call me Pro AsusSaaya yupp, I agree
what about Ci7
This question has been answered several times, Ci7's TjMax can be read directly from the CPU register, so no more guesswork.
Member of Overclockers.com Folding @ Home team
"<The_Coolest> you can't unwaste wasted CPU cycles" - Start FOLDing now!
Main rig:
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X / Mobo: Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 500GB + WD Blue 250GB + HDD / GPU: Dell RX 570 4GB / Mem: 2x16GB DDR4-3200 G.Skill 32GTZKW TridentZ - 32GB total / PSU: Seasonic Prime Ultra Gold 650W
Secondary rigs:
Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.3GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Mobo: Biostar TP67XE / 2x Inland Pro 120GB / GPU: HD5450 / Mem: 4x4GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 8GBXL RipJawsX - 16GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W.
Core i3 540 3.06GHz @ 4.0GHz (Freezer 7 Pro) / Mobo: MSI H55M-ED55 / GPU: Integrated / Mem: 4x2GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBRL RipJaws - 8GB total / PSU: Antec 380W.
Core Temp - Accurate temperature monitor for Intel's Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors
agreed... even @ 95ºC two of my cores report ambient temps.. so to be on the safe side i think that 100ºC is fine (still a bit depressing).
X5650 - TRUE120 - P6TD DELUXE (@P6T WS PRO 1205 (mod) Bios) - 3x8GB KINGSTON HyPERX @1760MHz (8-9-8-25-1T) - EVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC2 iCX - Seasonic X-850 - Samsung 850 512G - ACER Predator XB271HU - Dell SX2210
Idle temps are often inaccurate, it does not necessarily mean that the TJmax is wrong. Read more about it here.another confirmation of the impossible... 30ºC ambient and 30ºC on first and second cores (no to mention 25ºC 27ºC for the other two lasting cores)... this is with the 90ºC tJMax and a Q6600 G0 @ 1.336v 3.2Ghz... i find this amusing
95 is the right one for 65nm quads..... 100 is for 45nm.
That's debatable. You can't really say one number fits all.
Guys.. I think you don't take the inaccuracy of DTS logic into account which raises the more you go to lower temperatures.
I already mentioned several times that DTS was designed to catch the hot point (Tj,max) of CPU so that's the place where it reports most accurate results (still might be some deg. off).
Last edited by Mumak; 01-12-2009 at 04:27 AM.
thks Nickel020 im at it.
X5650 - TRUE120 - P6TD DELUXE (@P6T WS PRO 1205 (mod) Bios) - 3x8GB KINGSTON HyPERX @1760MHz (8-9-8-25-1T) - EVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC2 iCX - Seasonic X-850 - Samsung 850 512G - ACER Predator XB271HU - Dell SX2210
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks