90 is very incorrect, 95 is the right TjOriginally Posted by MomijiTMO
90 is very incorrect, 95 is the right Tj
So, I wanna know the CORRECT TjMAX for:
65nm QX6700 (B3 stepping)
Is it 90C? 95C? or 100C?
Damn intel....
and then have 10 million refunds to process from 3rd party companies like dell for example?
no, that won't happen.
As Los Alamos director J. Robert Oppenheimer watched the demonstration, he later said that a line from the Hindu scripture the Bhagavad Gita came to mind:
"I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."
Test director Kenneth Bainbridge in turn said to Oppenheimer, "Now we are all sons of b**ches." wiki
wow, i'm confused about why it's so hard for intel to just tell their customers the right tjmax. incomprehensible.
1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile
2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W
Perhaps because it's a "trade secret."
because they never ment to be public.
Actually they did. They made the IDF presentations because of endless customer enquiries about temps. It doesn't mean they had to tell us everything. It doesn't mean that what they told us is true either. We just have to accept it, ignore it or "fight" for the real stuff.because they never ment to be public.
I dunno if they were "mistaken" about the 65nm TJmax then who's to say they are right about 45nm TJmax, because they are supposed to put out far less heat but even with 95 TJmax they put out just the same, and if a 65nm is 95-90 then wouldnt a 45nm be less? this just make me wonder.
Really, if your 45nm is pulling the same heat as a 65nm on same volts or clock, then either you have a bad cpu, bad step, bad sensors or bad cooling.
If you want to compare how hot they are running, you need to know that Tj Max for both is correct or is wrong by the same amount. Then you need to assume the same slope error, which you can't really
I think they are shady about the TJ max due to overclocking a lower priced cpu vs purchasing a higher clocked stocked cpu (though niche crowd) and losing profit.
I don't see how that would affect what they're telling us. A EE chip isn't going to run significantly cooler than a mainstream chip. Intel knows that few people are going to pay for an EE chip, that will never change. The funny thing is that the QX9650 and QX9770 actually have a 5-15C lower Tj Max than the mainstream chips, at least according to Intel.
Nothing funny there -> higher tjmax means they can use a cheaper cooling solution, they acutally mentioned that in there presentation.
Does the QX9770 come with a more expensive cooler than the Q9550? They are the same stepping, but Tj Max is much different.Nothing funny there -> higher tjmax means they can use a cheaper cooling solution, they acutally mentioned that in there presentation.
The QX9770 and QX9775...at bottom of intel specs sheet "These processors ship without a fan heatsink. They require a third party liquid cooling solution." So definitely different cooling.
From IDF and from formula, Tjmax is dependent on power and cooling solution (also on ambient temps but they are same in intel testing). Q9650 is 95 watts and air cooled, QX9770 is 135W and water cooled.
I wanna know the correct TjMAX for: e6850 65nm
E6850(L720 xxx vid:1,275v)lapped 3600mhz(1,264v)3800mhz(1,31v)4000mhz(1,39v)\\Ninja rev A lapped\\Dfi ut p35 t2r\\Team Xtreem 2x1gb TXDD2048M1000HC5DC (5-5-5-15 800mhz) 1,63v !!! (5-5-5-15 1100mhz) 1,91v (4-4-4-12 1000mhz)2,19v\\ Samsung 500gb F3\\Asus GTX 550Ti \\Enermax Modu+ 525w\\Case Fractal Arc Design Midi
yep they do, the QX9770 uses the same cooler als the QX9650. And the cooler is hughe compared to the stock Qxxxx cooler.
I know this is a bit of thread necromancy, but I've recently been shown this Tom's Hardware news article, which is stating all the TJ Max numbers for every Core2 (and Core2 based Xeon).
I want it to be right, I really do, but it's Tom's, and doesn't agree with everything else that's been posted here...
Eller
Desktop: Q6600 G0 @ 3.6 Ghz | P5E | 2x2 Gb G.Skill PC8000 | GTX 560 Ti | CM690 | TT TP 750 watt | Win 7 Pro x64 | Water Cooling
Server: i3 530 (Stock) | CM Vortex Low-Profile | Zotac H55-ITX WIFI | 2x2Gb Corsair 1333Mhz | IGP | VX450 | Server 2008 R2 x64
Well I can tell you that for the Q6600 they're wrong at least.
I mean, I'd love it if that's correct, but that would put mine at sub-ambient sometimes, and I can't force myself to believe.
God damn you Intel, why can't you just publish the proper numbers already
Eller
Desktop: Q6600 G0 @ 3.6 Ghz | P5E | 2x2 Gb G.Skill PC8000 | GTX 560 Ti | CM690 | TT TP 750 watt | Win 7 Pro x64 | Water Cooling
Server: i3 530 (Stock) | CM Vortex Low-Profile | Zotac H55-ITX WIFI | 2x2Gb Corsair 1333Mhz | IGP | VX450 | Server 2008 R2 x64
I have my doubts they'll ever publish it.
so.. whats the tj max for an i7?
Cpu: Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.9 ghz (cooled w/ Apogee GTZ)
Mobo: Gigabyte EX58 UD5
Ram: G.SKill 3x1 GB DDR3 1600
GPU: GTX 280
PSU: E Power 1000 Watt
The article was correct about the numbers Intel posted originally, but hasn't been updated with the "fixed" numbers. You should pretty much ignore both as they aren't going to give you accurate temps.
They have, but because Tj Max isn't a constant the numbers have little meaning other than a sedative for the masses.
It is variable. Usually it's at 100C.
As the TjMax can be read directly from the CPU in Core i7 there is no more guesswork.
Member of Overclockers.com Folding @ Home team
"<The_Coolest> you can't unwaste wasted CPU cycles" - Start FOLDing now!
Main rig:
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X / Mobo: Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 500GB + WD Blue 250GB + HDD / GPU: Dell RX 570 4GB / Mem: 2x16GB DDR4-3200 G.Skill 32GTZKW TridentZ - 32GB total / PSU: Seasonic Prime Ultra Gold 650W
Secondary rigs:
Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.3GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Mobo: Biostar TP67XE / 2x Inland Pro 120GB / GPU: HD5450 / Mem: 4x4GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 8GBXL RipJawsX - 16GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W.
Core i3 540 3.06GHz @ 4.0GHz (Freezer 7 Pro) / Mobo: MSI H55M-ED55 / GPU: Integrated / Mem: 4x2GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBRL RipJaws - 8GB total / PSU: Antec 380W.
Core Temp - Accurate temperature monitor for Intel's Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks