Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 287

Thread: ACARD RAM Disk 9010 series

  1. #51
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    'burb of Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,871
    So, if this was a boot drive, if I pressed the power button to turn the computer on, would your RAM drive load the info from the CF into the RAM and then boot the computer? How would that work?

  2. #52
    ODOC
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Copenhagen - Denmark
    Posts
    2,189
    welcome to xs and awesome to see ram drive @ ddr2 will be released

    Thanks for the information you have posted

    which voltage is supplied to the DIMMs, ddr2 jedec standard or?

    thanks

  3. #53
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    398
    Quote Originally Posted by Polizei View Post
    So, if this was a boot drive, if I pressed the power button to turn the computer on, would your RAM drive load the info from the CF into the RAM and then boot the computer? How would that work?
    Jason can confirm, but it's probably "always on" like i-ram and hyperdrive4. If the power goes out, it uses the battery. UPS is nice for extra comfort

  4. #54
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    'burb of Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,871
    How would it be always on though... drawing power from the 5vsb? How? I see no wires.

  5. #55
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Australia! :)
    Posts
    6,096
    Quote Originally Posted by Polizei View Post
    How would it be always on though... drawing power from the 5vsb? How? I see no wires.
    I see Sata power connector and some kind of 4 pin power connector thing at the back...
    DNA = Design Not Accident
    DNA = Darwin Not Accurate

    heatware / ebay
    HARDWARE I only own Xeons, Extreme Editions & Lian Li's
    https://prism-break.org/

  6. #56
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    101
    In less than a year flash memory will meet and probably exceed even SATA-II bandwidth. Most OEMs will figure out how to parallelize flash like the FusionIO drive and flash-based SSDs will have completely overtaken the market, replacing mechanical hard drives in workstations and laptops.

    Magnetic hard drives will be used exclusively for backups, just as tape is relegated to those duties now. You will probably see one, maybe 2 drives in RAID 1 included for backups in systems because people will have much greater expectations for data availability and reliabililty.

    Call me Nostradumbus, but I see this only as a novelty solution. The inherent problems of using DRAM to store data with any kind of longevity are just too great and I doubt this device will solve that problem.

    Benchmark queen? Check.

    Interesting and fun to mess with? Check.

    Useful and valuable? Fail.
    My Latest Project: SXbox

    • TT Mozart TX Case
    • Samsung 32Gb SSD * 3 (RAID 0)
    • Raptor 150GB x 2 (RAID 0)
    • 2x 8800GTX 768MB 640/1040Mhz
    • Core 2 Duo E6420 Conroe 2.13/3.00Ghz
    • EK + Apogee GTX
    • ASUS P5N32-E SLI Plus
    • 4GB 1066 Mem
    • Silverstone DA850
    • 2x MCP350
    • 2x Magicool Extreme Slim Profile Rads

    + Many Many Hours

  7. #57
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,163
    What are expected access times with onboard and external controllers?

  8. #58
    SLC
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    2,795
    Quote Originally Posted by Sunayknits View Post
    Most OEMs will figure out how to parallelize flash like the FusionIO drive and flash-based SSDs will have completely overtaken the market, replacing mechanical hard drives in workstations and laptops.
    They won't replace HDDs for a while... Speed ultimately means little in workstations. There are still WAY too many BIG problems with SSDs that can not be sovled in 1 year. Maybe 3-5 years.

  9. #59
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,592
    Quote Originally Posted by Sunayknits View Post
    In less than a year flash memory will meet and probably exceed even SATA-II bandwidth. Most OEMs will figure out how to parallelize flash like the FusionIO drive and flash-based SSDs will have completely overtaken the market, replacing mechanical hard drives in workstations and laptops.

    Magnetic hard drives will be used exclusively for backups, just as tape is relegated to those duties now. You will probably see one, maybe 2 drives in RAID 1 included for backups in systems because people will have much greater expectations for data availability and reliabililty.

    Call me Nostradumbus, but I see this only as a novelty solution. The inherent problems of using DRAM to store data with any kind of longevity are just too great and I doubt this device will solve that problem.

    Benchmark queen? Check.

    Interesting and fun to mess with? Check.

    Useful and valuable? Fail.
    Sorry Nostradumbus but its already in use and critical for the enterprise (not this particular solution, but its more expensive relative).

  10. #60
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    BREA, CA
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by Polizei View Post
    So, if this was a boot drive, if I pressed the power button to turn the computer on, would your RAM drive load the info from the CF into the RAM and then boot the computer? How would that work?
    Good thinking there. When you turn off your PC the backup mechanism will start, when you turn it back on, data will be fed from CF card.

    Quote Originally Posted by Oliver View Post
    welcome to xs and awesome to see ram drive @ ddr2 will be released

    Thanks for the information you have posted

    which voltage is supplied to the DIMMs, ddr2 jedec standard or?

    thanks
    Thank you I'll try my best to explain here.
    DDR2 RAMs varies a bit on voltage base on, partly, DDR speed and CL timing.
    Internal controller will synchronize the difference so all RAM onboard will operate as one. I hope I answer your question?

    Quote Originally Posted by m^2 View Post
    What are expected access times with onboard and external controllers?
    For ACARD RAM Disk, access time is too fast and the benchmark software cannot evaluate the speed since it enters ns (nanosecond?) access time instead of ms.

    Quote Originally Posted by Levish View Post
    Sorry Nostradumbus but its already in use and critical for the enterprise (not this particular solution, but its more expensive relative).
    Users have different preferences and I respect everyone's opinion.
    Like I said before, SSD has huge advantages in a lot of applications, but it also bares the drawback of write time and write cycle limitation.
    I don't see why this cannot be solved with the advancement of technology.

    As far as cost of SSD goes, it will become dramatically user friendly within a year or two, depending on how the giant players plan their marketing.

    Back to RAM Disk, there is a fine line between DDR RAM Disk and SLC/MLC SSDs.
    Info on SSD are everywhere online; so I will stop here and not to make myself appearing incompetent going into the technical.

    There are a lot of RAM Disk applications, already deployed, in video editing, HD microscope video capturing, and enterprise grade solutions. RAM Disk is absolutely not perfect, but it does have great values.
    What ACARD is trying to do is to introduce something different, an option for the user, with 9010 RAM Disk.

  11. #61
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,163
    Quote Originally Posted by JasonACARD View Post
    For ACARD RAM Disk, access time is too fast and the benchmark software cannot evaluate the speed since it enters ns (nanosecond?) access time instead of ms.
    Nanoseconds...nice.
    Other RAM SSD manufacturers measure it somehow. Hyperdrive claims 1100 ns read/250 ns write.

  12. #62
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Stockton, CA
    Posts
    3,568
    I think I just found what to use my other 4 SATA connectors on my ARC-1231ML for

    I like it !!

  13. #63
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Australia! :)
    Posts
    6,096
    Quote Originally Posted by Levish View Post
    Sorry Nostradumbus but its already in use and critical for the enterprise (not this particular solution, but its more expensive relative).
    QFT

    while DDR based SSDs arent used for super-long term storage, they still definitely used, & in a rather sizeable solution.. Sunayknits, ever heard of terra ramsan?

    http://www.thinkcp.com/products/terraramsan.asp

    DNA = Design Not Accident
    DNA = Darwin Not Accurate

    heatware / ebay
    HARDWARE I only own Xeons, Extreme Editions & Lian Li's
    https://prism-break.org/

  14. #64
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Canada, BC
    Posts
    539
    QFT

    while DDR based SSDs arent used for super-long term storage, they still definitely used, & in a rather sizeable solution.. Sunayknits, ever heard of terra ramsan?

    http://www.thinkcp.com/products/terraramsan.asp
    Notice 2500 watts

  15. #65
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    101
    Quote Originally Posted by tiro_uspsss View Post
    QFT

    while DDR based SSDs arent used for super-long term storage, they still definitely used, & in a rather sizeable solution.. Sunayknits, ever heard of terra ramsan?

    http://www.thinkcp.com/products/terraramsan.asp

    Yeah I've seen the Texas Memory Systems devices and they are very impressive. I suppose there is still a niche for this kind of thing. Still, I believe flash will soon be so fast as to eliminate this market entirely.

    I guess time will tell!
    My Latest Project: SXbox

    • TT Mozart TX Case
    • Samsung 32Gb SSD * 3 (RAID 0)
    • Raptor 150GB x 2 (RAID 0)
    • 2x 8800GTX 768MB 640/1040Mhz
    • Core 2 Duo E6420 Conroe 2.13/3.00Ghz
    • EK + Apogee GTX
    • ASUS P5N32-E SLI Plus
    • 4GB 1066 Mem
    • Silverstone DA850
    • 2x MCP350
    • 2x Magicool Extreme Slim Profile Rads

    + Many Many Hours

  16. #66
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Australia! :)
    Posts
    6,096
    Quote Originally Posted by crackhead2k View Post
    Notice 2500 watts
    I must admit I missed that part - my eyes got all misty when I read: " Over 3.2 million random I/O requests per second " just imagine, ACARD has ~95K (read) IOPs, so thats the equivalent of... almost 34 ACARDS!
    DNA = Design Not Accident
    DNA = Darwin Not Accurate

    heatware / ebay
    HARDWARE I only own Xeons, Extreme Editions & Lian Li's
    https://prism-break.org/

  17. #67
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,163
    This system is very old.
    RamSan 440 offers 512 GB @ 650 Watts peak.
    RamSan 500 - 2TB of flash + 64 GB RAM cache @ 300W.
    And each takes 4U, not 24.
    ADDED:
    Quote Originally Posted by tiro_uspsss View Post
    I must admit I missed that part - my eyes got all misty when I read: " Over 3.2 million random I/O requests per second " just imagine, ACARD has ~95K (read) IOPs, so thats the equivalent of... almost 34 ACARDS!
    Quote Originally Posted by JasonACARD
    IO meter is from a RAID 0 setup
    Quote Originally Posted by JasonACARD
    # IOPS 20,000 per SATA port
    Last edited by m^2; 09-23-2008 at 09:15 AM.

  18. #68
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    799
    I just had a great idea for Acard's new drive, and how I'm thinking about setting up my system. I'm thinking 1 RAM disk totally dedicated to OS and bare essentials like codecs and hotfixes. Then, a second "image" RAM drive. Then as big storage (here's where it gets good, I think anyway), 3x750GB (or whatever size you want) standard HDDs, that store ghost images of the second RAM drive. So what you do is boot into windows, install your game onto the 2nd image RAM drive, take a ghost image of it and stick it in the big storage. Write a simple .bat file and any time you want to play like CS, the image is transfered from the big storage to the image RAM drive and played from there. That way you don't have to worry about maxing out the storage on any of the RAM drives or having to pick and choose which games to keep installed on there, and while your initial "load" time would be slightly longer, it would definitely pay off while in game. Hmmm....

    /beardstroke

  19. #69
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,163
    Quote Originally Posted by WangChung View Post
    I just had a great idea for Acard's new drive, and how I'm thinking about setting up my system. I'm thinking 1 RAM disk totally dedicated to OS and bare essentials like codecs and hotfixes. Then, a second "image" RAM drive. Then as big storage (here's where it gets good, I think anyway), 3x750GB (or whatever size you want) standard HDDs, that store ghost images of the second RAM drive. So what you do is boot into windows, install your game onto the 2nd image RAM drive, take a ghost image of it and stick it in the big storage. Write a simple .bat file and any time you want to play like CS, the image is transfered from the big storage to the image RAM drive and played from there. That way you don't have to worry about maxing out the storage on any of the RAM drives or having to pick and choose which games to keep installed on there, and while your initial "load" time would be slightly longer, it would definitely pay off while in game. Hmmm....

    /beardstroke
    Copying games before use...You'll loose way more time on it than you'll gain by having them on a RAM device.

  20. #70
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,592
    my bet is that the acard solution is even better than expected when paired with a quality controller is used as opposed to the onboard stuff, as IOPs and latency is at its mercy at a certain point (barring of course your own dram controller isn't holding the performance back)

    also

    JasonACard my reply was for SunayKnits, more specifically clarifing that a solution similar to ACard's device is already in "mission critical" type use.

  21. #71
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,418
    Lol those types of RAMSAN drives cost more than most peoples houses.

  22. #72
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,592
    but they are not in any way shape or form designed / intended for home users.

  23. #73
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    BREA, CA
    Posts
    16
    Hi Guys,
    glad to see the conversation goes on
    I was having hands-on testing with our units in the past few days and it's ready to go.
    Soon we'll be seeing some reviews.
    Are there any good review websites that you guys recommend?

  24. #74
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    1,392
    Apart from here lol

    Anandtech, toms hardware and hardocp are the ones I really like although many here will now spit on and deride me. I m looking forward to testing one myself if you'll sell me a sample
    ******************************************
    Respec'
    System:Bunch of crappy overclocked PC's that cost an arm and a leg


  25. #75
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by JasonACARD View Post
    Are there any good review websites that you guys recommend?
    in addition to Anandtech, I like reading the reviews at hexus too, but for a drive i'd look at www.storagereview.com

    Nox

Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •