Sub 4GHz SPi 1M

**AndrewZorn** · 10-27-2008, 06:47 PM

What am I doing wrong?

3.8ghz
1012mhz, 5-5-5-15 (I know, not the best, read on)

XP 32bit
8 processes not including superpi (only two less than usual, ended explorer)
2 services total (usually i run 4 (including Themes!), these last two: RPC, PnP cannot be disabled)
Tried setting affinity, changing priority... doesn't seem to do much.

Still can't get under 13seconds. About 13.2xx every time.

Is it some 'strap' thing?

**Revv23** · 11-10-2008, 05:55 PM

Whats the rest of your setup? performance level? mobo?

**AndrewZorn** · 11-12-2008, 10:31 PM

It's all in the sig...

**ceemic** · 01-07-2009, 08:21 AM

My sub-45kpp run: http://ceemic.pri.ee/45nm/44973pp.jpg

Tnx to Bullet92

**pofigist** · 01-07-2009, 09:39 AM

11.5

11.25

**tot31** · 01-13-2009, 04:57 AM

I got 11.375s...Core i7 920 @ 3.6Ghz..

**Bullet92** · 01-13-2009, 09:16 AM

Originally Posted by ceemic

My sub-45kpp run: http://ceemic.pri.ee/45nm/44973pp.jpg

Tnx to Bullet92

No problem but try to play more with strap tweaker

I've got 11.218s and will try to get less soon. It was with good old P5K

**ceemic** · 01-13-2009, 01:53 PM

Bullet92, I still haven't got time to try strap-tweaker

**tot31** · 01-13-2009, 04:29 PM

Core i7 920 @3.80Ghz

**yankee** · 01-13-2009, 04:42 PM

Your settings considered, particularly ram timings, your time doesn't seem too bad. Also, it's a conroe G0, so it's just not as efficient as a wolfdale or bloomfield.

You could probably get a few tenths shaved off by upping your Performance Level. It can be a pain to get stable though.

Edit: I did bench a G0 conroe at nearly the same settings.

**Nanok** · 01-13-2009, 06:21 PM

Here is my best preformence sp1m run, on Asus commando.
44962.728

**ceemic** · 02-01-2009, 07:15 PM

Another sub45k run, this time Gigabyte EP45-DQ6:
http://ceemic.pri.ee/45nm/44923pp.jpg

And one run under LN2: http://ceemic.pri.ee/45nm/7.016.jpg Not sub45k tho

**quake6** · 02-13-2009, 10:20 AM

Read this thread and then post your result...

**MrMason** · 02-24-2009, 06:07 PM

I hit around 10.2-10.3 at 3.998ghz on my i7 920

**quake6** · 02-24-2009, 10:22 PM

Come on guys,read this thread before posting... This isn't for Nehalem...

**okorop** · 03-05-2009, 08:46 AM

sorry i did'not know it.....

I remove my screen shot now

**xcavax** · 03-05-2009, 08:49 AM

nice score okorop!

**tool_462** · 03-05-2009, 09:46 AM

Originally Posted by quake6

Come on guys,read this thread before posting... This isn't for Nehalem...

Did it say that anywhere? I must've missed it.

Either way here is my result:

I could've sworn I had a 11.250 run with DDR2-1000 CAS 3 but I can't find a screenshot anywhere. I may be wrong though.

**angoholic** · 03-25-2009, 03:55 PM

DFI DK P45 T2RS Plus with PP<45k

**AceNZ** · 09-05-2009, 08:23 AM

This is a new benchmark for me, and my times are terrible:

I ran the test with affinity set to one CPU and in realtime mode. My OS is Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit.

Could the poor result be happening due to the 4MB of cache per CPU, vs. 6MB for some of the better results?

I do have a bunch of services running, but it's hard to imagine that being more than a 20% effect at the absolute maximum.

I know my memory timings are a little off. I've had trouble getting the numbers where they should be (the chips are spec'd at 5-5-5-15). My motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3P. Again though, this doesn't seem like a big enough difference to account for my results.

I have speedstep enabled, but it kicks up to 2400 MHz after only about 3 seconds. If I disable speedstep, the overall result only improves by about 1 sec.

**~~proxis~~** · 09-05-2009, 08:36 AM

vista and speedstep is a mistake for superpi
4mb is also slower than 6mb , best you can get with 4mb is somewhere in 50500 pp

**Gaul** · 09-15-2009, 08:15 AM

heres mine, no - TWEAK

Thread: Sub 4GHz SPi 1M

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rate This Thread

Display

Am I doing something wrong?

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions