You are about memset ?
all the same for 2 runs.
Massman that's only one run it can't proof or disprove anything can it? Like I said, clean setup get a base reference stock whatever score, put an hairdryer instead of a fan on the cpu hs and see if you get a speed boost
Just quickly reading what has been said in this page, and some possibilities (again recapping, credit to massman and CCC for discovering):
- Could be ATI driver not switching to 3D clocks between test runs causing "bugged" runs? But sometimes it works, so you get a "real" clock. This issue becomes moot when you recall this happens on nVidia cards as well (unless it is the blackscreen effect which makes sense then).
- Could be unstable CPU causes 3DMark to error out, resulting in a bugged score (ie may fail half way or part way through a test resulting in unusually high score). Meaning, that a stable setup would never experience such a bug as 3dmark behaves expectantly.
But this itself doesn't make any sense if you are actually seeing higher FPS, wouldn't it mean that there is better performance?
Also, let us eliminate the black screen issue. This is diluting the results because the black screen issue is reproducable with anything. If we put that aside, we can hopefully just focus on "successful" 3dmark03 runs.
My watercooling experience
Water
Scythe Gentle Typhoons 120mm 1850RPM
Thermochill PA120.3 Radiator
Enzotech Sapphire Rev.A CPU Block
Laing DDC 3.2
XSPC Dual Pump Reservoir
Primochill Pro LRT Red 1/2"
Bitspower fittings + water temp sensor
Rig
E8400 | 4GB HyperX PC8500 | Corsair HX620W | ATI HD4870 512MB
I see what I see, and you see what you see. I can't make you see what I see, but I can tell you what I see is not what you see. Truth is, we see what we want to see, and what we want to see is what those around us see. And what we don't see is... well, conspiracies.
No idea what is causing that issue; mchbar is locked with this motherboard, so I can't even change one setting in memset.
I just recieved this motherboard a few days ago, for reviewing purposes, so I'll try to figure it out. It'll be solved with a bios update, I reckon.
The screenshot was to show that in my bugged runs, the 750/900 stock clocks are applied in each test. A follow-up run with a non-bugged run and a temperature test will be conducted tonight.
Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.
Ran the follow-up: no noticeable downclock in rivatuner. Is there a way to monitor the frequencies of both cores separatly?
By the way, compare the GPU usage % in both runs, nearly identical, so the card gets equally loaded in the bugged and non-bugged runs.
Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.
Just measure power consumption and reproduce a bugged and unbugged run. That'll tell you quickly if perhaps one of the GPUs is dropping out and rendering blank frames, artificially padding the GT2/3 scores.
Ran the tests to see whether cpu temperature is making a difference, underneath the setup:
First result is with a vcore of 1.104v, second result is with 1.488v running through the cpu and thus way hotter (idle in bios around 52°C)
Both runs are not bugged.
Great idea
Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.
Catalyst 8.9 beta is out http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...6&postcount=16
I'm going to sound like a jerk sorry in advance but if you test something why not keep the ss universal? I'm missing rivatuner in your last shots Massman
Universal as in? My only two screenshots that have rivatuner in it were those to check if the card downclocks at a certain point, hence rivatuner was absolutely necessary to prove my point. In all my other screenshots the actual frequencies the card is running at is of no relevance to the test. Gpu-z is included to show that I'm running 750/900.
And no, I don't consider you a jerk; this question is in fact a good question .
Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.
Yeah but it also proofs nothing changed between runs, not that I don't believe you when you say so but looking at all the info at once instead of having to think of something which isn't right there ( but in the back of your head ) sometimes makes spotting that troublemaker easier.
I'm not sure if RT can follow two gpu cores at once, but I think when you look at vreg amp draw it would show there if a core dropped out to?
what LOD are u guys running at? to compare scores directy, u need to know everything the guy did, ram timings, PCI-freq, LOD, motherboard (some are waaay faster than others), u know. the worst choice of LOD and worst board vs the best board and best tweaks might make an 7k difference in some instances.
but i agree with everything that is said here, something isnt right , the bugged run is so common it isnt a bug run anymore, its something else, but it is still an invalid score. hell, 4870x2 cant get near this score in 01 :P
Maybe nothing is bugged lol. Now for some reason my scores about 3000 pts higher than DeDaL's and we're on basically the same board. (I'm on P5E64 WS Evolution, he's on P5E3 Premium) The Rampage Extreme scores exactly the same for me too. LOD does nothing. I've tried up to 10 and it has no effect on the scores.
You're exactly right though, we need to know everything that everyone is doing to get a firm handle. I don't do anything at all besides set Cat AI to standard (but I just found that Advanced scores the same) and I turn the mipmap detail to high performance.
FWIW I usually use Vista Home Premium or Home Basic instead of Ultimate...Ultimate seemed to score a little worse, but Kinc has been using it.
Intel e8500@4000MHz@1.36v|OCZ Vanquisher|Asus P5e3ws Professional|2*1024 OCZ PC12800 D9GTR@1600MHz@7/6/6/x@1.92v|Point of View 8800GTS 512MB@730/1825/2000MHz|Stock Cooling|Seagate 500GB 7200.12|Enermax 460w|Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 4
Administrator and Editor of Uranium Backup Blog
Administrator and Editor of Hymn to Future
Service pack 1 is huuuuugggge...a clean 3000 point boost! I feel like an idiot for not trying this earlier.
However...there is still a 4000 pt gap between spl and I, and still about 1500 between myself and T_M...
Intel e8500@4000MHz@1.36v|OCZ Vanquisher|Asus P5e3ws Professional|2*1024 OCZ PC12800 D9GTR@1600MHz@7/6/6/x@1.92v|Point of View 8800GTS 512MB@730/1825/2000MHz|Stock Cooling|Seagate 500GB 7200.12|Enermax 460w|Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 4
Administrator and Editor of Uranium Backup Blog
Administrator and Editor of Hymn to Future
Link? I thought that was included in SP1??
I had a strangely low GT2/GT3 ONCE...when my fans were not at 100%. Is it possible that your cards are not fully stable and are throttling? PCI-E shouldn't make your score jump 2000 points, only ~500 it seems to me, at best.
All of your system info is showing as N/A...do you have the futuremark hotfix? I doubt it'd make a difference tho.
Oh, yeah. The only driver setting I even change is mipmap detail in CCC. :S
Very strange indeed...
64 bit or 32 bit?? Which version of Vista??
i use vista ultimate 64bit sp1
in the ccc default
Bookmarks