That's still way too low. 4.8Ghz and 790/915 I get 133k with 1180 GT2. And even that is way lower than spl.
Yes.
That's still way too low. 4.8Ghz and 790/915 I get 133k with 1180 GT2. And even that is way lower than spl.
Yes.
Intel e8500@4000MHz@1.36v|OCZ Vanquisher|Asus P5e3ws Professional|2*1024 OCZ PC12800 D9GTR@1600MHz@7/6/6/x@1.92v|Point of View 8800GTS 512MB@730/1825/2000MHz|Stock Cooling|Seagate 500GB 7200.12|Enermax 460w|Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 4
Administrator and Editor of Uranium Backup Blog
Administrator and Editor of Hymn to Future
how do you guys make this black screen effect i dont now, i can't make bugged runs with even vista64 and 8.8 cata...
its just completely slow compared to 155k runs at almost the same cpu/gpu clocks, ofc if those are real score
NO..I did NOT ONLY point to you. I didn't want to say who make bug is because everyone is possible. I research this bug for one week and try to find how to control GT1/2/3/4 bugs. Depend on gpu clock, you can easy to handle score you want. I am so disappoint about some guys did them. I have did the same speed/gpu as kinc and control bugs GT2/GT3 close to kinc. YES, the score is the same. I know it's bug because I handle it. If everyone think your score is real, I could say my handle score is real,too.
Forget 03, kinc, until driver fixed them. I didn't respond any 03 messages and pms here until all problem fixed.
Intel e8500@4000MHz@1.36v|OCZ Vanquisher|Asus P5e3ws Professional|2*1024 OCZ PC12800 D9GTR@1600MHz@7/6/6/x@1.92v|Point of View 8800GTS 512MB@730/1825/2000MHz|Stock Cooling|Seagate 500GB 7200.12|Enermax 460w|Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 4
Administrator and Editor of Uranium Backup Blog
Administrator and Editor of Hymn to Future
But you say you can control it, I only run and this is what I get as shown in the videos. How are you able to control the scores? We need to take this to the right person at FM so they can fix it. Can you share here? Or I can give you contact person at FM that will do the best to remedy this and you can contact directly. They need all the input on this issue as they can get. For now 03 is sadly dead yes
Guys what I think is needed to be done is:
1) Have someone run some normal frequencies on the CPU ( that everyone can reach ) and some "high clocks" on the VGA to "trigger" the blank screen bug or the bug itself as Andre says.
2) Give us the full rig specs ( hardware & software ), and the "extra" software installed and/or used ( example RivaTuner + LoD @ +3.9, etc ).
3) Initiate contact and have someone at FutureMark check this out himself.
And for God's sake don't start flaming each other ( as far as I can see things this haven't been done, it was one person misinterpreting the other person's post )
I might have more to add later on... I'm not 100% concentrated at the moment.
Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.
-Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.
Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero
I have removed my score from the ORB since I want to wait with 03 until this issue is solved. Going to do some other fun stuff instead
I ran at 5600MHz (multi is actually 10, left EIST on ):
Kinc's run at 5600MHz:
I don't think 30MHz on the GPU and 70MHz on the memory could possibly make up an 8000 point deficit. Bugs aside, something seems to be hampering the CF performance. This time around this was a P5E64 WS Evolution, for me it performs exactly the same as the Rampage Extreme.
I don't care about the bugged runs at all at the moment, I'm more concerned in finding out what this gap is.
Last edited by Gautam; 09-05-2008 at 12:52 PM.
If you took the time to make this run, why not match the clocks exactly?
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=766920
this score is bugged ot hell and back
1100fps gt1 at 6ghz
but 800fps nature gt4 at only 820/1000
come on
Win7 64 Ultimate
i7 930 - 4200mhz 24/7 - Dtek v2
ASUS P6X58D-E
2 x MSI 6970's xfire
3 x 2gb G-Skill 2000mhz
Samsung 27" LCD
SilverStone ZM1200w psu
2 x 300gb WD Velociraptors Raid 0, 4TB storage
PS3-used mostly for bluray and media server
I don't think either are bugged, to be honest. I can do the same runs all day, and I know Marcus can do his all day. Like I said, I don't care about the bugged runs atm. This is a separate performance issue with 4870X2 CF.
Kinc, joe_cool and spl have a lot of runs that are consistent. They are the only three with "high" runs. Mine are more "normal." I'm thinking there is something special going on with the configuration.
The mem's 1:1 at 5-4-4-15 because the board was being an ass, but it doesn't make a difference. Raising GPU clock from 790/915 to 842/1000 helps only by ~1500 pts, so there's no reason that going to 877/1070 will suddenly get much higher.
My watercooling experience
Water
Scythe Gentle Typhoons 120mm 1850RPM
Thermochill PA120.3 Radiator
Enzotech Sapphire Rev.A CPU Block
Laing DDC 3.2
XSPC Dual Pump Reservoir
Primochill Pro LRT Red 1/2"
Bitspower fittings + water temp sensor
Rig
E8400 | 4GB HyperX PC8500 | Corsair HX620W | ATI HD4870 512MB
I see what I see, and you see what you see. I can't make you see what I see, but I can tell you what I see is not what you see. Truth is, we see what we want to see, and what we want to see is what those around us see. And what we don't see is... well, conspiracies.
I see it, but it will not be 7000 points. I gain 1500 points going from 790/915 to 842/1000.
I won't suddenly gain 7000 points going from 842/1000 to 877/1070.
Right now there are only 3 people alive that I see with "high" scores. And look at everyone else with "normal" scores.
Everyone that's trying to answer either has normal scores or doesn't even have the cards. I want to hear answers from the 3 people with the high scores. I don't care about how to bug the runs right now. We need answers from these 3 people, simple as that.
So where are your scores anyways George? If you can match Kinc, joe_cool, and spl, and have an answer, I'd love to hear it.
Edit: Here is what I get at 842/950 at 4.8GHz.
spl:
Now don't tell me it's the 8MHz extra on the GPU doing it lol. (And no, before anyone brings it up, it's not the FSB either, just look at Kinc's monster score at only 400MHz FSB)
Last edited by Gautam; 09-06-2008 at 07:48 AM.
Here is my bugrun to add to the others. Can you say busted.
By r1rhyder at 2008-09-06
Last edited by r1rhyder; 09-06-2008 at 12:21 PM.
Bookmarks