What i like to see if possible is the GFLOP's again as that also goes to show what GPU's and system builds can do compared to others, but of course the memory free used will also factor in the score.
What i like to see if possible is the GFLOP's again as that also goes to show what GPU's and system builds can do compared to others, but of course the memory free used will also factor in the score.
Last edited by BeastNotro; 08-15-2008 at 02:00 PM.
**PC Specs**
- Intel E8600 E0 @ 4.2ghz @ 1.33v full load (Vid 1.25) Batch # Q822A441
- Asus P5Q Deluxe P45 (Bios 1402)
- T-Right Ultra 120 Extreme (lapped), 1 x Noctua P12
- 1 x ATI HIS 4850 @ 700/1100
- 4gb G.Skill F2-8000CL5D-2GBPK @ 1008mhz
- TT ToughPower 650w
- 1 x 640GB Seagate Sata II
- Antec 900 Case
- Vista 64bit SP1 and All Useful Updates
**My Template for 4.2ghz speed**
[URL=WILL MAKE ONE UP SOON[/URL]
Orthos Prime (Blend) Stable 16hrs
You can still see the GFLOPs by running IntelBurnTest with error-checking disabled.
.:: Gaming PC Specs ::.
Case: Antec Nine Hundred
CPU: Intel Core i7-2600K @ 4.6 GHz, 1.44v (cooled by Xigmatek GAIA) [IntelBurnTest{Linpack} stable]
GPU/Monitor: VisionTek HD 6950 @ 6970, 950 MHz/1375 MHz 1.30v + Sony BRAVIA 32EX400 1080p
Motherboard: GIGABYTE Z68XP-UD4 F5
Memory: 16 GB (4x 4 GB) Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600
Hard Drive: 2x Seagate 500 GB 7200.11 RAID 0 & RAID 1 (Matrix RAID) + 1x WD Caviar Black 640 GB
Sound: Creative SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Profess1onal, Logitech X-530
PSU: Corsair AX-1200 (1500W PSU!)
O/S: Microsoft® Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 X64
**PC Specs**
- Intel E8600 E0 @ 4.2ghz @ 1.33v full load (Vid 1.25) Batch # Q822A441
- Asus P5Q Deluxe P45 (Bios 1402)
- T-Right Ultra 120 Extreme (lapped), 1 x Noctua P12
- 1 x ATI HIS 4850 @ 700/1100
- 4gb G.Skill F2-8000CL5D-2GBPK @ 1008mhz
- TT ToughPower 650w
- 1 x 640GB Seagate Sata II
- Antec 900 Case
- Vista 64bit SP1 and All Useful Updates
**My Template for 4.2ghz speed**
[URL=WILL MAKE ONE UP SOON[/URL]
Orthos Prime (Blend) Stable 16hrs
Update to my previous post.
After my system being stable after 30 passes, I then ram Prime95 using large FFTs. After 2Hrs and 15 mins, my system crashed.
I have now raised my PLL, FSB Term and NB voltages.
I quickly ran prime for 3Hr and 20 mins with no problems.
Will run it overnight (16 hours ) to test it.
Just goes to show, no one test alone stresses everything.
But, it is still a great stress testing program.
The benefit of this program, besides finding not stable machines, is to do a stress test in a QUICK timeframe, 10-15mins compared to the over 2h required in orthos and occt to find errors.
Besides, I do agree with unclewebb that what matters in the end is stability in YOUR daily use.
SB Rig:
| CPU: 2600K (L040B313T) | Cooling: H100 with 2x AP29 | Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3
| RAM: 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1866 | Video: MSI gtx570 TF III
| SSD: Crucial M4 128GB fw009 | HDDs: 2x GP 2TB, 2x Samsung F4 2TB
| Audio: Cantatis Overture & Denon D7000 headphones | Case: Lian-Li T60 bench table
| PSU: Seasonic X650 | Display: Samsung 2693HM 25,5"
| OS: Windows7 Ultimate x64 SP1
+Fanless Music Rig: | E5200 @0.9V
+General surfing PC on sale | E8400 @4Ghz
I agree, at least on my setup, it would help to quickly find unstable OC's using the max setting. I am not sure if it's from the code or fact that it raises my load temp an additional 10C over prime to 66 from 56. I will still prime/orthos overnight to be sure.
On my previous post with pics, at 2 notches below stability, orthos failed in 3.5 hours versus both runs of 15 intelburntest on max setting failed in 21 mins each.
I just finished testing 1 notch below stability, where orthos 10ffts and prime small ffts has failed at 8 and 10hrs. Intelburntest failed one 30 run at max and passed one. It made 2 errors in first 60 run, and 1 error in second 60 run but not until line 49, so may well pass a 60 run if ran enough times. Odds are also unlikely it would pass 2 60 runs (3 hours total) in a row and odds are it would fail the first run.
But at both one notch and two notches of vcore below stable, this version of linpack was quicker than orthos/prime at finding instability, so it seems useful prior to running prime overnight, for those like me that do so.
I like this software, for sure. It help me to finding errors in my new rig that prime95/OCCT have not found in many dozens of hours of test. For reaching stability in my windows xp x86 i need less volts (for Vcore, NB and Vtt Cpu), two o three notches less, that for reaching stability in my windows x64 (4 hours of test). With x86 i use custom level, 2GB of RAM. With x64 i use level 1 (3.5GB). So, i have a question: It´s strictly necessary to use the bios settings for max stability in x64 if we will only use the x86 version for 24/7?
Last edited by vega22; 08-16-2008 at 10:49 AM.
DFI UT x58/i7 940
TRUE Black + 2 Scythe s-flex PushPull
Dominator GT 3x2Gb 2000 CL8 @ 1600 CL6
XFX GTX280 XXX
Velociraptor 150 Raid0 - Seagate 500 Raid1
Corsair Hx1000
Lian-Li PC-A77 Mod
**Sorry by my Spanglish**
I will say again: it is highly recommended to use the most memory possible in a 64-bit Windows environment for the most accurate test.
.:: Gaming PC Specs ::.
Case: Antec Nine Hundred
CPU: Intel Core i7-2600K @ 4.6 GHz, 1.44v (cooled by Xigmatek GAIA) [IntelBurnTest{Linpack} stable]
GPU/Monitor: VisionTek HD 6950 @ 6970, 950 MHz/1375 MHz 1.30v + Sony BRAVIA 32EX400 1080p
Motherboard: GIGABYTE Z68XP-UD4 F5
Memory: 16 GB (4x 4 GB) Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600
Hard Drive: 2x Seagate 500 GB 7200.11 RAID 0 & RAID 1 (Matrix RAID) + 1x WD Caviar Black 640 GB
Sound: Creative SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Profess1onal, Logitech X-530
PSU: Corsair AX-1200 (1500W PSU!)
O/S: Microsoft® Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 X64
True, I thought better and you have absolutely right.
DFI UT x58/i7 940
TRUE Black + 2 Scythe s-flex PushPull
Dominator GT 3x2Gb 2000 CL8 @ 1600 CL6
XFX GTX280 XXX
Velociraptor 150 Raid0 - Seagate 500 Raid1
Corsair Hx1000
Lian-Li PC-A77 Mod
**Sorry by my Spanglish**
Great Little program.
I'm still trying out to see how sensible is it.
I'm using Vista Business x64 SP1 with 8GB, Q6600 GO VID 1.3000 @ 3.1GHz.
I can report that using Max I get lower GFlop numbers and much lower CPU stress, CPU Temp (with Real/CoreTemp) report around 55C using custom with 6000-6500MB or mid settings I get 68-69C.
After first fews runs look like prime95 but more stressfull, cpu temps are nearly 10C hotter:
Running low memory high numbers -> Small FFT
Running mid memory high numbers -> Large FFT
Running high memory mid numbers -> Blend.
Sometimes I get a slight different residual in the first round of test (5 test) but nothing in the next 2-3 rounds.
I've tested my new rig without any problem at 3.1GHz 1.2875V 24h prime95 (latest beta), a mix of prime95/3DMark03 for 12h, Othos/OCCT whatever I've throw at it, stable like a rock, after the first round of LinPack in 5 min I've uncover that my CPU is not stable, up the vcore a notch, nearly stable, at vcore=VID=1.3 look stable.
My goal is 3.0Ghz so I've attained it, yes not extreme, but it'll be my main rig and I want absolute stability, without pushing too far.
BTW the q6600 GO are an absolute steal, not as fast as penryn clock-for-clock, but less problem with the board, mature process 65mm, more cheap, the next big things is the tock version of i7 (aka Nehalem) next summers not the penrys
Last edited by mazzy; 08-17-2008 at 07:58 AM.
I noticed that this is a really good program to find VTT problems. Prime/Orthos needs really long runs but this does it in minutes.
ASUS P5Q, E8400@3995Mhz, Radeon 5870, 2x2gb G-skill 6400 4-4-4-15
.:: Gaming PC Specs ::.
Case: Antec Nine Hundred
CPU: Intel Core i7-2600K @ 4.6 GHz, 1.44v (cooled by Xigmatek GAIA) [IntelBurnTest{Linpack} stable]
GPU/Monitor: VisionTek HD 6950 @ 6970, 950 MHz/1375 MHz 1.30v + Sony BRAVIA 32EX400 1080p
Motherboard: GIGABYTE Z68XP-UD4 F5
Memory: 16 GB (4x 4 GB) Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600
Hard Drive: 2x Seagate 500 GB 7200.11 RAID 0 & RAID 1 (Matrix RAID) + 1x WD Caviar Black 640 GB
Sound: Creative SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Profess1onal, Logitech X-530
PSU: Corsair AX-1200 (1500W PSU!)
O/S: Microsoft® Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 X64
Need some help with this program.
I'm trying to get my system stable but aparently it is not even stable when underclocked...
One strange thing I keep noticing is that burn tests always reports my CPU as 3.2 ghz wven when it is underclock to 2.4 ghz.
Can I really trust this program to provide accurate results when the CPU clock is not even reported correctly?
Enermax Liberty 620 Modular
Liquid Stacker
8GB G.Skill PC2 8800 5-5-5-15 @ 400MHZ (PC6400 Speed)
DFI LP LT X48-T2R
Liquid Cooling:
Thermochill PA 120.3 W/ Panaflo L1BXs/L1As
D5 andFuzion V2, DD MCP Universal
8800GTS G92
Intel Q9450 @3200MHZ @ 1.18v (Wont OC any higher despite voltage increases)
No . . . Hot!cool
75 degrees !!! Orthos only gave me 67.
E8600 (Q823A221)
Asus Rampage Formula
2x2G G.Skill DDR2 1066
2 MSI 4850's CF
750w PC Power & Cooling
Liquid cooled
Not good, I knew it was too good to be true when I purchased computer parts and all of them worked without having a single RMA. I Always get a defective part ALWAYS. Now to figure out what is defective is going to take a long long time! Whats my best bet to try next in a situation like this?
edit:
Memory passes in slot 1, and slot 3, but not when using 1 & 3 together. WTH!
Last edited by Justintoxicated; 08-18-2008 at 12:01 AM.
Enermax Liberty 620 Modular
Liquid Stacker
8GB G.Skill PC2 8800 5-5-5-15 @ 400MHZ (PC6400 Speed)
DFI LP LT X48-T2R
Liquid Cooling:
Thermochill PA 120.3 W/ Panaflo L1BXs/L1As
D5 andFuzion V2, DD MCP Universal
8800GTS G92
Intel Q9450 @3200MHZ @ 1.18v (Wont OC any higher despite voltage increases)
CPUBurn Also passes when running memory in slots 1 & 2 (single channel) but again fails when running dual channel. Does this indicate a problem with the CPU or the Motherboard? I'd assume it indicates a problem with the motherboard?
Enermax Liberty 620 Modular
Liquid Stacker
8GB G.Skill PC2 8800 5-5-5-15 @ 400MHZ (PC6400 Speed)
DFI LP LT X48-T2R
Liquid Cooling:
Thermochill PA 120.3 W/ Panaflo L1BXs/L1As
D5 andFuzion V2, DD MCP Universal
8800GTS G92
Intel Q9450 @3200MHZ @ 1.18v (Wont OC any higher despite voltage increases)
Well, returned today from holiday and found the 1.4 were out. So i've downloaded it and found that all issues that i had with v1.1 were off. In fact with v1.1, even if the residual(norm) values were identical, my system went crazy, with nb and sb temp going from -64 to 0 and then dying, the lcd poster starting blinking and the usb wireless dongle connecting and disconnecting. Now with v1.4 all these issues are gone, and i found very useful the auto detection of free ram. Great work!
BTW, it seems to me or the v1.4 runs MUCH hotter than the previous one? running a brief 5 passes test, i saw 78°C on the hottest core while a week ago with v1.1 after a 10 passes test i've touched 75°C and the ambient temp were hotter than today...so the question is: does someone have already burnt their CPU running this test? How much longer can i keep the cpu near or over 80°C before it melts down?
Asus Rampage Formula / Q6700 G0 + TRUE / 4 x OCZ 9200 FleXLC / BFG 8800 Ultra OC / X-Fi XtremeGamer
Enermax Galaxy 1000 DXX / CM Stacker / Dell 2707 / Logitech G15 + G9 + Z5500
Since none of you replied to my other thread...
Try running this and Orthos together. I can run both seperately and not get over 75 degrees with either one. I tried running them together for grins and my temps shot up over 100 degrees and my whole box shut off.
Give it a shot if you wanna test your cooling. I've never seen something quite like it!
MAIN: 4770K 4.6 | Max VI Hero | 16GB 2400/C10 | H110 | 2 GTX670 FTW SLi | 2 840 Pro 256 R0 | SB Z | 750D | AX1200 | 305T | 8.1x64
HTPC: 4670K 4.4 | Max VI Gene | 8GB 2133/C9 | NH-L9I | HD6450 | 840 Pro 128 | 2TB Red | GD05 | SSR-550RM | 70" | 8.1x64
MEDIA: 4670K 4.4 | Gryphon | 8GB 1866/C9 | VX Black | HD4600 | 840 Pro 128 | 4 F4 HD204UI R5 | 550D | SSR-550RM | 245BW | 8.1x64
Bookmarks