This might be the first ATI reference card with a black PCB in a long time, if ever...
<3 my black pcb 8800 ultra
Beautiful!
Is there any word on the launch date?
Nvidia is screwed !
CPU: INTEL Q9550 E0 @ 3600 1.28V + CORSAIR H50
GPU: EVGA GTX 480 @ 725/1450/3800
PPU: EVGA 9800GTX @ 738/1836/2250
MB: ASUS P5E X38
RAM: MUSHKIN 2X2GB
SOUND: X-FI TITANIUM FATAL1TY | LOGITECH Z-5500 | LOGITECH G35
HDD: WD 76GB X 2 RAPTORS RAID 0 10KRPM | WD 1TB CAVIAR BLACK 32MB STORAGE
PSU: CORSAIR HX1000W PSU
OS: WINDOWS 7 PRO X64 OS
MON: HANNSPREE 28" 1920X1200 RESOLUTION
Well... it's a beast for sure...
Oh wow, that thing looks sexy...
I'm wondering if the performance will be the same with two 4870's in CF.
Intel i7 920 d0 @ 4410MHz @ 1.36v :: Prolimatech Mega Shadow :: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 F9K :: 6GB Mushkin XP3-15000 :: HIS 5870 :: Corsair 1000W :: HannsG 27.5" :: Lian Li V1010B
It really looks pretty.
Perhaps it will perform better?Originally Posted by AriciU
Doesn't a single HD3870 X2 outperform two HD3870s in crossfire?
Oh man that's nice. Should pack a punch too!
Me wants a black PCB on my 4870XT
No idea. Had no interest in ATI untill now. I know that two 9800GTX's in SLI worked better then a single GX2.
Intel i7 920 d0 @ 4410MHz @ 1.36v :: Prolimatech Mega Shadow :: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 F9K :: 6GB Mushkin XP3-15000 :: HIS 5870 :: Corsair 1000W :: HannsG 27.5" :: Lian Li V1010B
It looks fantastic,but I hope that will work even better
nice design
they could make that pcb even shorter...
system:
Phenom II 920 3.5Ghz @ 1.4v, benchstable @ over 3,6Ghz (didnt test higher)
xigmatek achilles
sapphire hd4870 1gb @ 820 1020
Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
8gb a-data 4-4-4-12 800
x-fi xtrememusic
rip 2x 160gb maxtor(now that adds up to 4...)
320gb/250gb/500gb samsung
Benches we need, lots of them
4670k 4.6ghz 1.22v watercooled CPU/GPU - Asus Z87-A - 290 1155mhz/1250mhz - Kingston Hyper Blu 8gb -crucial 128gb ssd - EyeFunity 5040x1050 120hz - CM atcs840 - Corsair 750w -sennheiser hd600 headphones - Asus essence stx - G400 and steelseries 6v2 -windows 8 Pro 64bit Best OS used - - 9500p 3dmark11(one of the 26% that isnt confused on xtreme forums)
PLX chip in the middle = no performance gains over regular 4870 in CF just like the 3870x2
I mean, I could be totally wrong, but I for some reason am under the impression that crossfire-on-a-chip performs better than normal crossfire.No idea. Had no interest in ATI untill now. I know that two 9800GTX's in SLI worked better then a single GX2.
Correct me if I'm wrong, anyone.
Does that PLX chip act as a PCI-E bus or something of the sort? Kind of like emulating crossfire?
Last edited by ExodusC; 06-28-2008 at 12:18 AM.
That empty space on the pcb was intentional to make room for the fan. They could make it shorter if they replace the cooling solution with 'dual orb' style cooling.
Jesus that PCB is a mess.
Well this makes it it sound like it won't be CF on a card:
CNET Article
For ATI, the execution of this chip-ganging strategy is the key. And this is where ATI appears to have been successful. "The inter-processor communications. Getting that to work has been the trick. This is what ATI has done. They've come up with this stellar way of doing inter-processor communications so they can in fact get the scaling," according to Peddie.So basically the card will not be CF on a board but will be a new interconnect between the GPU's. Also, it seems to suggest that the CrossFire connection was redone in the RV770 or at least for R700 since Peddie suggests that the CF connection is no longer at the very very end of the pipeline. Maybe that's why recent CF results of the 4800's show incredible scaling when it works? Or if as anandtech suggested and it was disabled on the RV770 cards, then it might be turned on for this and is different from the current 4800's.AMD-ATI's upcoming R700 (rumored to be called the 4870 X2) two-chip graphics board will be the ultimate test of this strategy.
"It's a new proprietary inter-processor communication technology. If they put these two chips on one board and it does scale properly, then they have pulled off a coup," he said.
"When you gang up graphics chips (using the traditional Scalable Link Interface or CrossFire technologies) they roll off pretty fast. ("Roll off" implies that performance doesn't scale up well.) "So when you put two boards in, you don't get twice the performance but you (only) get one and a half. You put four boards in and you (only) get about 1.7, 1.8. What ATI is saying is that with two chips using (their) proprietary inter-bus, they will get 1.8 (the performance) with two chips. If that's true, you can expect to see four of them giving you something around 2.5."
Getting 2.5 times the performance from four boards would be a masterstroke for ATI.
The previous ATI dual-chip solution was very different, Peddie said. "The HD 3870 X2 was not a proprietary bus but a CrossFire connection. The CrossFire connection and the SLI connection are at the very, very end of the pipeline. Not the most efficient place to do an inter-processor communication. That's one of the reasons ATI has abandoned it."
Anyways, with the plethora of information of R700 that was just released it seems like ATI is pushing hard to get these cards out fast.
And quit thread crapping Sr7. This isn't the place for agendas.
Has the cooler been spotted anywhere?
Yes
http://img.hexus.net/v2/graphics_car.../R7001-big.jpg
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1211646064
Last edited by zerazax; 06-28-2008 at 12:27 AM.
I fraking KNEW it....
Anyone else notice the size of the PLX chip..? I think AMD leveraged some type of their hyper-transport technology with this newer PLX chip. It would confirm the hints AMD was mentioned a few months back about a new internal bridge.
Did I mention is was fraking black...?
Last edited by Xoulz; 06-28-2008 at 12:51 AM.
Black is great.
Last edited by Cooper; 06-28-2008 at 12:47 AM.
nice.. black PCB
Q6600 1.390v 3.8G Vid: 1.2125
Bookmarks