i expected a little better, but im not surprised. a tad better than 88gt
i read somewhere that there could be a 4850X2 , but anyway
...waits for 4870X2, and wotever driver nightmares that entails...
i expected a little better, but im not surprised. a tad better than 88gt
i read somewhere that there could be a 4850X2 , but anyway
...waits for 4870X2, and wotever driver nightmares that entails...
Last edited by adamsleath; 06-18-2008 at 05:25 AM.
i7 3610QM 1.2-3.2GHz
Interesting results...
I wouldn't mind seeing some overclocking results soon
Asus Maximus Extreme // Q6600 G0 @ 3807mhz 9x423 1.5v // Sapphire 4850 860/1025
4gb 2x2 OCZ DDR3 1333(D9GTN) 6-5-5-18@1354mhz 6-5-5-18 T1 @1.85v// Silverstone DA750 // Silverstone TJ09-B
Loop: D-tek Fuzion w nozzle // MCW60 // MCRES-MICRO // MCP655 // PA120.1 // PA120.2
The fact that it barely beats the 8800gt is pretty disappointing considering the 8800gt is only 130 euro and the 4850 seems to be priced at 160 euro or so.....
LAME
Unless the 4870 pulls something out of the hat I will just get a 200 euro 9800GTX
Wait for official reviews and ATI Tool
Informal, please learn to deal with naysayers in a manner that does not derail the thread. Yes, I could get angry at the lot trying to spin this in Nvidia's favour when, again, its far from the review quality we see elsewhere, but that won't stop users from take a shot at the numbers anyhoo.
Perkam
I know Perky,but Shintai is in semi-denial mode again..How can anyone spin a 576mm2 monster chip into cost advantage?IF NV is going to fight the RV770(X2) ,it will do it with G92 and not GTX200.
edit: I now see the OP updated the 1st post,the test was done with Cats 8.5...
Last edited by informal; 06-18-2008 at 05:40 AM.
i want to see both on a quad with 4gb of memory and updated drivers...
The driver bundle is probably also 8.5. If it's the same as the "8.6 BETA"s I'm using now, they're earlier than the 8.5s in date.
These drivers even bork up 3DMark06 where it should pounce, obviously meant to discredit people who ruin NDA.
FYI I heard that Catalyst 8.6 FINAL has leaked to testers under NDA.
4850 vs. 8800 Series
4870 vs. 9800 Series
4850x2 vs.GTX260
4870x2 vs. GTX280
thats what I think which card will be up against which one, pricing atleast suggests it.
So as long as nvidia doesnt bring a die shrink of the GTX280 or a GTX280Gx2 Amd can actually deliver some competiton (provided they release the cards and dont screw something up).
Last edited by Stuen4y; 06-18-2008 at 05:45 AM.
MPOWER|i5 3570K|TRUE Spirit 140|2x4GB+2x2GB|VTX3D 280X|SanDisk Extreme 120GB|HX520W|Arc Midi|G2222HDL|G400s+QcK|Xonar DGX
F1A75-V EVO|3870K|Venomous X|2x4GB|5830+DeepCool V400|F4EG 2TB|Solid 3 120GB|Silencer MKIII 500W|NZXT Source 210 Elite|IPS226V|Xonar DG
Overclock yourself, you must!!!
Nothing wrong here.
This is a single slot 4850 with a stock speed of 650 Mhz and it performs better then a dual slot solution from Nvidia.
Wait untill dual slot overclocked 4850's also become available for comparison. Get that GPU up to 800 Mhz+ on a Zerotherm GPU cooler, and it will cream everything in its price category from Nvidia.
Also, the drivers look to be immature still, and need improving for the 4800's performance.
And GX2 is what, 2x328mm2?
And now you need 2xRV770 thats alot bigger than 2xRV670.
Even AMD says 4870X2 is what competes against a 280GTX. Thats right, 2xRV770, 2x512-1GB GDDR5. Pricy pricy.
I dont have an issue with 280GTX being 60% faster than a 9800GTX. Its you trying to gasp for something to hold on to the hype and dreams.
End of the day, nVidia performs better and nVidia makes money while AMD loses. But i´m sure you can try spin that aswell.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
I wonder what the HD4850 can do with a 4Ghz yorkfield because the 8800GT does a lot better than that.
Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card
LSI series raid controller
SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
OSes: Linux and Windows x64
Even the RV770 they have not appeared, neither a mature drivers, but I anticipate that the ATI guys haven't worked very much... I believe that this new GPU will continue being a step behind from the competence. Putting a good price is a good way to competing in the market, but this is not an valid answer for the users, no no...
I hope to see soon good results from the RV770s and a better price of the GT200s, I also am waiting to acquire a new graphic card.
Last edited by pablorodano; 06-18-2008 at 06:28 AM.
Last edited by safan80; 06-18-2008 at 06:33 AM.
Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card
LSI series raid controller
SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
OSes: Linux and Windows x64
Too early to be impressed
He re-installed drivers and got something more out of stock 4850 + 4ghz quad:
And with Mild OC, CPU still at 4Ghz:
Numbers thanks to Jimmy: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=191096
Perkam
8800gt 625/900
9650 @ 4.00GHz
-----------------
GT1 45.627 FPS
GT2 47.097 FPS
HDR1 50.009 FPS
HDR2 55.906 FPS
CPU1 2.157 FPS
CPU2 3.173FPS
4850 625/993 (I believe)
9650 @ 4.00GHz
-----------------
GT1 41.046 FPS
GT2 44.088 FPS
HDR1 58.529 FPS
HDR2 66.771 FPS
CPU1 1.893 FPS
CPU2 2.833 FPS
I'll admit, the other pic is really hard to read but I believe I input the correct numbers, if not let me know. However:
/end thread
Last edited by Eastcoasthandle; 06-18-2008 at 06:45 AM.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Bookmarks