great thread
im in the market for a new card
just sold my rip off 9800gtx
more benchies please
great thread
im in the market for a new card
just sold my rip off 9800gtx
more benchies please
|Rig|Sold my monster, stuck on a Q8200 and 9500Gt with 4G of ram.
Originally Posted by
Originally Posted by jimmyz
Still haven't got Crysis working?
I can only get the bench app to work right in XP I can't start the flyover bench with the app in my vista 64 bit , instead it just starts the game. I have spent 6hours+ just trying to get it going. I posted up the benches in xp, when I get Vista 64 benching done in full DX10 glory I will add it of course. I can say the game is playable with high details @ 1680 X 1050 on a stock gpu, quite impressive for a midrange card, more than I was expecting for sure.
QX 9650 5ghz with 1.55v 4.8ghz with 1.5v 24/7 in a VAPOLI V-2000B+ Single stage phase cooling.
DFI LP LT X-38 T2R
2X HD4850's water cooled , volt modded
Thermaltake 1KW Psu
4x Seagate 250GB in RAID 0
8GB crucial ballistix ram
A64 3500+ Winchester @ 10x270@1t 1,55volt
Adata DDR 566 2x512MB 2,5 3 3 5 +OCZ DDR Booster
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum
1a HV2, Alphacool GP N40,Black Ice Extreme III Radiator. Coolermaster Stacker(watercool mod)
Gainward 6800Ultra @470Mhz Chip 1.3Ghz Ram.
sata raid 0 2x 7k250
Audigy 2 ZS
The only ones I found will change the game settings but the bench remains the same, could you show me a link?
Also I do not have oblivion or COD4 , I wish I did as I would love to test them (and play them). I am loading up Prey , and quake 4 to bench.
This was a clean install and all of my games needed to be re-loaded. I also dl. ed a few other apps we'll see if they work.
QX 9650 5ghz with 1.55v 4.8ghz with 1.5v 24/7 in a VAPOLI V-2000B+ Single stage phase cooling.
DFI LP LT X-38 T2R
2X HD4850's water cooled , volt modded
Thermaltake 1KW Psu
4x Seagate 250GB in RAID 0
8GB crucial ballistix ram
Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)
The integrated GPU Benchmark should accept the very high settings.
Try it with Xconfig:
http://crymod.com/thread.php?threadi...tuser=0&page=1
http://planetcrysis.gamespy.com/View...s.Detail&id=23
Would be cool if it works, I could make a few benchmarks with my 8800 GTX, though it's not the best way to compare, but very High with AA
is pretty GPU limited...
Last edited by cl55amg; 06-14-2008 at 03:51 AM.
A64 3500+ Winchester @ 10x270@1t 1,55volt
Adata DDR 566 2x512MB 2,5 3 3 5 +OCZ DDR Booster
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum
1a HV2, Alphacool GP N40,Black Ice Extreme III Radiator. Coolermaster Stacker(watercool mod)
Gainward 6800Ultra @470Mhz Chip 1.3Ghz Ram.
sata raid 0 2x 7k250
Audigy 2 ZS
the review as stopped Jimmyz the entire world is waiting for your review
you've become enthusiasts Celeb
hurry up man, show us what Ati can do
cheers might
SILVERSTONE TJ07 . ASUS RAMPAGE EXTREME . INTEL C2D E8600@ Q822A435 . 6GB CELLSHOCK PC3 15000 . EVGA GTX 285 . WD VELOCIRAPTOR 300HLFS . WD AAKS 640GB ''RAID0 . CORSAIR HX 1000W . X-Fi FATAL1TY TITANIUM . LOGITECH WAVE . G9 LASER . Z5500 . DELL ULTRASHARP 2047WFP
Aquaero VFD . Enzotech revA . Laing DDC 12v . Black Ice GTS-Lite 360 . Swiftech Mcres Micro . 3/8"
By MrHydes®
sales feedback Techzone
How many FPS do you need in the Crysis benchmark tool for the game to be playable?
A64 3500+ Winchester @ 10x270@1t 1,55volt
Adata DDR 566 2x512MB 2,5 3 3 5 +OCZ DDR Booster
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum
1a HV2, Alphacool GP N40,Black Ice Extreme III Radiator. Coolermaster Stacker(watercool mod)
Gainward 6800Ultra @470Mhz Chip 1.3Ghz Ram.
sata raid 0 2x 7k250
Audigy 2 ZS
It feels playable at high settings with 1680 x 1050 so the 35fps avg it turns in on that bench settings seem reasonable. it isn't smooth as butter but it is a far cry (pun intended) from the performance of my 3850 which had to drop to med. in fact the in game button for optimal settings choses high when clicked.
I ran the in game batch file and 19 X 12 results in this using the Xconfig file from a few posts up, very high settings. seems to me the bench app adds some overhead? the bench app showed no improvement where the ingame gpu test did.
[IMG][/IMG]
I am not including it in the review but it does help for daily play, and image quality looks great.
Last edited by jimmyz; 06-14-2008 at 05:02 AM.
QX 9650 5ghz with 1.55v 4.8ghz with 1.5v 24/7 in a VAPOLI V-2000B+ Single stage phase cooling.
DFI LP LT X-38 T2R
2X HD4850's water cooled , volt modded
Thermaltake 1KW Psu
4x Seagate 250GB in RAID 0
8GB crucial ballistix ram
I think what DilTech was saying is that there was no significant AA hit since in that game the shaders handled it(perhaps the RBEs would handle that task in other games?)... Many a great Dx9 game do not force certain methods of AA(shader based) so you can't really make a blanket statement and say that AA has been completely fixed.
I would love to see an oblivion with Qarl's Texture pack 3(4096x4096 textures) benched...
Ultimately I'm not entirely surprised by these results, they are great indeed but not enough to get current 8800GTS(G92 and up) or 3870 Xfire(and up) owners to jump. However for the budget minded gamer/bencher who has suffered along with an old 7 series nVidia or ATI x1xx gpu the 4850 is the best upgrade option hands down...
What might get me off my 8800GTS(802core/2003shader/2248memory gaming/stress test stable) is the 4870 1gb GDDR5 for $329. I'm just upset I have to wait at least another freaking month to buy one.
@ OP thanks for all hard work/effort you've put into benching this card for the community... Kudos to you!
wasup, nice but try to compare with other graphic cards like 3870 single/X2 , G80 ultra, G92 gt/gts and the 9800 series , this be very useful to many people , congratz
A64 3500+ Winchester @ 10x270@1t 1,55volt
Adata DDR 566 2x512MB 2,5 3 3 5 +OCZ DDR Booster
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum
1a HV2, Alphacool GP N40,Black Ice Extreme III Radiator. Coolermaster Stacker(watercool mod)
Gainward 6800Ultra @470Mhz Chip 1.3Ghz Ram.
sata raid 0 2x 7k250
Audigy 2 ZS
As I said earlier I am very busy outside of the forums, I own 3870X2's but all of my past tests were at 4.5 - 5ghz, those results would be meaningless here. I may have time to retest later at the slower speed. I never needed to downclock before but since this is a review I selected 4ghz.
This is just a simple review, not a shootout, besides the ultra and the 3870x2 are well over twice as expensive. I don't own a 9800GTX but I will test If somebody sends me one. I think you guys comparing this to the top of the line are asking a bit much, this is a budget card for mid level gaming. the big dogs will be out soon.
QX 9650 5ghz with 1.55v 4.8ghz with 1.5v 24/7 in a VAPOLI V-2000B+ Single stage phase cooling.
DFI LP LT X-38 T2R
2X HD4850's water cooled , volt modded
Thermaltake 1KW Psu
4x Seagate 250GB in RAID 0
8GB crucial ballistix ram
As you're doing crysis runthroughs, could you run it at 1440x900 at High with no and 4x AA, and again with no and 4x AA with this custom config, using the benchmark tool (rather than the batch file) in DX9 mode?
The reason i ask is cause my 8800GT returns these results, and i want to see how the 4850 does in comparison:
r_width=1440
r_height=900
con_restricted=0
d3d9_TripleBuffering=1
q_renderer=3
r_ssao_quality=1
r_ssao_amount=0.4
r_SSAO_darkening=1.3
r_TerrainAO_FadeDist=1
r_HDRlevel=1
r_TexturesStreaming=0
r_ColorGradingDOF=1
r_ShadowJittering=1.5
r_ShadowBlur=3.0
r_motionblur=5
e_gsm_lods_num=5
e_shadows_from_terrain_in_all_lods=0
e_shadows_max_texture_size=768
e_view_dist_ratio=80
e_view_dist_ratio_vegetation=48
e_view_dist_custom_ratio=150
e_particles_lod=0.7
e_vegetation_min_size=1.5
r_sunshafts=1
e_water_ocean_fft=1
r_WaterReflectionsQuality=3
e_detail_materials_view_dist_xy=4096
e_detail_materials_view_dist_z=256
r_UsePOM=1
e_lod_ratio=8
e_terrain_lod_ratio=0.6
e_vegetation_sprites_distance_ratio=1.7
e_vegetation_static_instancing=1
r_GeomInstancing=1
e_particles_thread=1
e_cull_veg_activation=70
e_max_entity_lights=20
es_MaxPhysDist=300
es_MaxPhysDistInvisible=35
r_BeamsMaxSlices=220
r_DetailDistance=12
r_TexturesStreaming=0
r_EyeAdaptationBase=0.15
g_BattleDustEnable=1
s_CacheSize=90
ai_interestsystem=1
High
===
0xAA = 42.145fps
4xAA = 32.93fps
Custom
=====
0xAA = 29.515fps
4xAA = 22.38fps
32/64-bit both score the same on my setup
Cheers, and TIA
Last edited by Kai Robinson; 06-14-2008 at 05:23 AM. Reason: Clarification
Main Rig
Intel Core i7-2600K (SLB8W, E0 Stepping) @ 4.6Ghz (4.6x100), Corsair H80i AIO Cooler
MSI Z77A GD-65 Gaming (MS-7551), v25 BIOS
Kingston HyperX 16GB (2x8GB) PC3-19200 Kit (HX24C11BRK2/16-OC) @ 1.5v, 11-13-13-30 Timings (1:8 Ratio)
8GB MSI Radeon R9 390X (1080 Mhz Core, 6000 Mhz Memory)
NZXT H440 Case with NZXT Hue+ Installed
24" Dell U2412HM (1920x1200, e-IPS panel)
1 x 500GB Samsung 850 EVO (Boot & Install)
1 x 2Tb Hitachi 7K2000 in External Enclosure (Scratch Disk)
Entertainment Setup
Samsung Series 6 37" 1080p TV
Gigabyte GA-J1800N-D2H based media PC, Mini ITX Case, Blu-Ray Drive
Netgear ReadyNAS104 w/4x2TB Toshiba DTACA200's for 5.8TB Volume size
I refuse to participate in any debate with creationists because doing so would give them the "oxygen of respectability" that they want.
Creationists don't mind being beaten in an argument. What matters to them is that I give them recognition by bothering to argue with them in public.
+1 million
I've also been saying this a thousand times, WAIT FOR THE 4870X2 FOR A HIGH END FROM ATI. Its that simple, the 4850 is a performance card, a very powerful one, but nothing more, nothing less. Get over it, and compare it to something more reasonable, such as a 9800gtx with a 5% performance boost as that's probably about what the 9900gtx will be and that will be the 4870's main competitor unless it can compete with the gtx 260
ok allways tnks bro ! I'm very exciting whit this series, I want to see if really this series wins to nvidia in price/performance
Bookmarks