http://www.tgdaily.com/html_tmp/cont...37925-113.html
damn, sure does look awesome
http://www.tgdaily.com/html_tmp/cont...37925-113.html
damn, sure does look awesome
Last edited by -Anti-; 06-12-2008 at 11:43 PM.
o withray acingu getthe sme pformance but u need a quad server board and 10 grand yay
5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi
guess what nvidia has in common with bender?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=D8QYZ8ZmAVs
actually you get much worse performance.
though image quality is much higher.
Its actually wuite amazing on how and how fast they can change the games to raytracing.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
And then they all went silent....because the game crashed
Intel is like Egypt in Rome:total war
Originally Posted by Movieman
qft!Posted by duploxxx
I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
Posted by gallag
there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
I wonder, if 32 or 64 ATOM like dies in a single package, could be effective with in some form or another, with regards to just raytracing. Something like that, perhaps even a single die (many small x86 units, each of them not very powerful at all).
Just speculating
Well I'm sceptical...
First of all, look at FPS... 13-16 Oo
2ns, look at noumber of details. World is completly flat, no grass, no anything and nothnig is mooving there.
3rd. Quality of... textures(?) (no idea how to call that). All surfaces are completly flat. Anybody remembers bumpmapping or paralax mapping?
4th. yeah I'm waiting for all these flying balls everywhere reflecting everything -.-
It reminds me Beyond3D article about raytracing and more I look at that, more I think they were right....
This post above was delayed 90 times by Nvidia. Cause that's their thing, thats what they do.
This Announcement of the delayed post above has been brought to you by Nvidia Inc.
RIGGY
case:Antec 1200
MB: XFX Nforce 750I SLI 72D9
CPU:E8400 (1651/4x9) 3712.48
MEM:4gb Gskill DDR21000 (5-5-5-15)
GPU: NVIDIA GTX260 EVGA SSC (X2 in SLI) both 652/1403
PS:Corsair 650TX
OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate
--Cooling--
5x120mm 1x200mm
Zalman 9700LED
Displays: Samsung LN32B650/Samsung 2243BWX/samsung P2350
Which is monumentally less then it took in the past on older versions of raytraced Quake.
Its coming along Fast.
Also don't forget that this is running on the CPUs alone. Their aim is to make a graphics card that is like a mini x86 multi cored cpu that will be designed from the ground up to handle ray tracing.
Its a demo, not a final product. It still needs work and it was just showing that it can be done. Come on now.
It could be done decades ago. Still real-time ray-tracing is far from being possible.
Well for me it doeasn't look better than old raytraced Q3 and looks worse than, for example, Crysis.
Only water and reflections are much better. But hey, how much of these we have in games?
Too bad we can't see reflections of other balls in these balls. Bu I have strange feeling that we wouldnt see proper "reflection of reflection" if you know what I mean.
So still, not impressed.
Intel i7 920 C0 @ 3.67GHz
ASUS 6T Deluxe
Powercolor 7970 @ 1050/1475
12GB GSkill Ripjaws
Antec 850W TruePower Quattro
50" Full HD PDP
Red Cosmos 1000
Have a better chance of doing realtime ray-tracing if you got one of those couple hundred dollar ray-tracing cards.
-=The Gamer=-
MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3) | i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz | 1.3875V | 28C Idle / 65C Load (LinX)
8Gig G.Skill Ripjaw PC3-12800 9-9-9-24 @ 1600Mhz w/ 1.5V | TR Ultra eXtreme 120 w/ 2 Fans
Sapphire 7950 VaporX 1150/1500 w/ 1.2V/1.5V | 32C Idle / 64C Load | 2x 128Gig Crucial M4 SSD's
BitFenix Shinobi Window Case | SilverStone DA750 | Dell 2405FPW 24" Screen
-=The Server=-
Synology DS1511+ | Dual Core 1.8Ghz CPU | 30C Idle / 38C Load
3 Gig PC2-6400 | 3x Samsung F4 2TB Raid5 | 2x Samsung F4 2TB
Heat
Raytracing is indeed older than a lot of people here, me included. As for real-time, werent Silicon Graphics visualization servers used for that? :
" Origin 3900 - up to 512 processors, 1 TB of memory, one to four tall racks"
Sure sounds it mightve been capable of some stuff :p
What is designed from the ground up for raytracing? Larrabee? What I've read this far suggests the focus of larrabee is rasterization and not raytracing?
Daniel Pohl had the q4 raytracing demo ready 2 years ago, implementing the same engine in ET:QW surely wouldnt take too much time. Both used id Tech 4.
Those screenshots look awful to me, the only thing that isnt ruined by textures is the water, which looks way too perfect in every way imaginable.
X3350 | DFI LP X38 T2R | d9gkx
9800gtx | Raptor1500AHFD/5000AACS/WD3201ABYS
Corsair 620HX | Coolermaster CM690
Water doesn't look amazing to me. What finally showed me what ray tracing is all about is the pic with a close-up on one of the balls and the reflection on it. Trully realistic!
Generalizations are, in general, wrong.
depends on what you call realistic, personally I'd expect from a shiny ball sitting in a dusty and humid environment to be looking a bit more dirty than that :p. I've yet to see a proper reflective surface with dirt on it raytraced in realtime. And what hits performance in the ballz on current raytrace renderers is adding blurry effects :p. Gimme some of that
X3350 | DFI LP X38 T2R | d9gkx
9800gtx | Raptor1500AHFD/5000AACS/WD3201ABYS
Corsair 620HX | Coolermaster CM690
Sure looks pretty crap tbh. and 1fps per thread....
I think they had the rest of the details turned down. While the reflective surfaces looked better I think the texture detail looked worse then when I played that game last.
Then again Quake Wars graphics aren't the highest quality to maintain high FPS on lower systems even with very large draw ranges (lots of flight combat)
Your not supposed to judge Ray Tracing based on the graphical limitations of the game that have nothing to do with ray tracing, that's not the point of this demo.
Its to further show that it can be incorporated into newer games.
Of course it can be implemented into newer games. We've all see older games pimped up a bit with better graphics. Intel couldve put in 2MP textures if they wanted to, however chose not to. Why? We all know id tech 4 supports textures which even without looking at technical data are of a higher resolution/quality.
My opinion is, the team behind this was chased by marketing with a stick, forcing them to show results faster and maybe take a bit of attention away from the new releases of ati and nvidia. I dont see another possible explanation myself
X3350 | DFI LP X38 T2R | d9gkx
9800gtx | Raptor1500AHFD/5000AACS/WD3201ABYS
Corsair 620HX | Coolermaster CM690
Bookmarks