Now that Futuremark has changed their policy, can we please implement this benchmark? I ask for this as we need to adopt new benchmarks and now there aren't any obvious issues to prevent the adoption of said benchmark.
![[XC] gomeler is offline](images/statusicon/user-offline.png)
![Send a message via AIM to [XC] gomeler](images/misc/im_aim.gif)
Now that Futuremark has changed their policy, can we please implement this benchmark? I ask for this as we need to adopt new benchmarks and now there aren't any obvious issues to prevent the adoption of said benchmark.
We are trying to work sth out with futuremark to make it less expensive for hwbot users... until then hwboints will most likely not be enabled.
HTPC (win xp): Turion MT-30 @ 2Ghz | NF4 | XFX 7900GT | 26" TFT
Development (mac osx): Macbook Pro | Core Duo 1.86Ghz | 1.5GB DDR2
Awww damnI hope everything gets hammered out quickly!
+1!!!Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler
Awww damn
Don't know if it would be that clever to add the benchmark right now, seeing the problems with the PhysiX drivers
Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.
I sadly have to agree with youDon't know if it would be that clever to add the benchmark right now, seeing the problems with the PhysiX drivers
I agree. Why would I have a 33000 cpu score? Physix is used in only a few games.Don't know if it would be that clever to add the benchmark right now, seeing the problems with the PhysiX drivers
Bumpasaurus Rex! Now that the physics drivers have been eliminated from FM Hall of Fame, can we get some Vantage points?
It would be nice, considering some of us lose 3dmarks vs XP users on 3Dmark01-06.
I am Xtreme
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks