"These are the rules. Everybody fights, nobody quits. If you don't do your job I'll kill you myself.
Welcome to the Roughnecks"
"Anytime you think I'm being too rough, anytime you think I'm being too tough, anytime you miss-your-mommy, QUIT!
You sign your 1248, you get your gear, and you take a stroll down washout lane. Do you get me?"
Heat Ebay Feedback
Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card
LSI series raid controller
SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
OSes: Linux and Windows x64
good question to have, the reason is some prime tools are not multi threaded, but your talking about PRIME, this thread is about PI 2 VERY different things.
and XP is not multi thread friendly where Vista is a must more multi thread friendly OS, a perfect example is video encoding. run the same program under those 2 os's and your guarenteed to have more mutli thread usage under vista than XP, if the program is coded correctly that is.
in terms of PI, PI is not a multi threaded application so unless you set the affinity it usually always hits 1 core with a higher thread priority than the other core. thats just the nature of the beast.
Fugger is designing the app to be a video card PI capp which again as you probably know is a very different type of coding and multi threading scenerio.
you've said prime several times are you meaning prime or are you meaning PI
lastly if you are referring to PI and just mistakenly said prime, and you are setting the affinity for each run of PI to a different core, and 1 core is slower, well, Fugger might be able to shed some light on things or someone else maybe but i have not seen the slow down per single core that you are referring to... :\
Last edited by Lestat; 06-26-2008 at 12:38 PM.
"These are the rules. Everybody fights, nobody quits. If you don't do your job I'll kill you myself.
Welcome to the Roughnecks"
"Anytime you think I'm being too rough, anytime you think I'm being too tough, anytime you miss-your-mommy, QUIT!
You sign your 1248, you get your gear, and you take a stroll down washout lane. Do you get me?"
Heat Ebay Feedback
I have, core 3 from my quad is noticable and repeatedly slower then the other 3 cores, though that could be the ihs not being perfectly flat since that core is usually hotter ( hotter=slower? ).
Maybe Safan was saying it would be fun to be able to target specific hw ( say you know the nv architecture and want to bench one set of stream processors directly ( nvidia groups sp's into groups of 8 iirc? )).. That way you can find out if any of the shader groups is faster or slower then the other. Though I don't think you can do this with CUDA.
Charles - is it public who is doing the coding, or is that being kept quiet? My research focuses in a related area and I could possibly contribute coding effort to this. I actually looked into doing this a year or two ago, but never got around to pursuing it in earnest.
I am still excited for this program.
Gigabyte P35-DQ6 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 | 2x1GB Crucial Ballistix DDR2-1066 5-5-5-15 | MSI nVIDIA GeForce 7300LE
I do video encoding xp x64 is not slower than vista x64 at doing it. I have no clue why you would think this. When I'm talking about prime I'm talking about running the 64bit version of prime from the makers of prime95. I haven't run a 32bit OS in a while. There are cases where some cores run slower than others, but I've noticed it depends on the voltage one uses on the chip if the problem comes up.
edit: anyways Fugger get the new version of Superpi get out
Last edited by safan80; 06-29-2008 at 09:06 PM.
Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card
LSI series raid controller
SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
OSes: Linux and Windows x64
"These are the rules. Everybody fights, nobody quits. If you don't do your job I'll kill you myself.
Welcome to the Roughnecks"
"Anytime you think I'm being too rough, anytime you think I'm being too tough, anytime you miss-your-mommy, QUIT!
You sign your 1248, you get your gear, and you take a stroll down washout lane. Do you get me?"
Heat Ebay Feedback
Psst, how goes it? Numbers need be crunched.
no I'm not this file is the one I get, it's 64bit.
Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card
LSI series raid controller
SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
OSes: Linux and Windows x64
so will it be possible to recode superpi to run on a radeon (in an CTM environment) too? and why didn't anyone tried to do it for ctm yet?
even if it's through some middleware layer so that ctm could use cuda's extensions etc... would be cool though.
1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile
2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W
Is there any progress to report that hasn't been reported?
Gigabyte P35-DQ6 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 | 2x1GB Crucial Ballistix DDR2-1066 5-5-5-15 | MSI nVIDIA GeForce 7300LE
Yes, there will be a special report later at an as yet unannounced time
Yes, Yellowbeard, a tall rough man with a big yellow beard
Well I'm waiting to hehe so hurry up...
Maybe abit OT but a good gpu benching tool which isn't 3d ( I mean, with 3dmark ect you can push the clocks to a point where you get artifacts and stll get a score but somehow I don't think the people over at Stanford would like people folding on those clocks ( well it should produce eue's but still I wouldn't mind a tool with which I can test the output besides atitool since I got false negatives and false positives with that in the past or furmark as I don't trust my eyes enough since were not talking about graphics but ggpu results ) is really needed, for reasons I somehow managed to put into one very long and badly formed sentence.
Anyway, we're waiting
And so?
is it necessary to calculate pi with the graphicscard?
it took William_Shanks 15 years to calculate pi with 707 digits by hand in 1873 but it had an error in it, the first 527 decimals was correct, which wasnt found until 1943 by ENIAC, one of the first computer's
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Shanks
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi
Memorizing digits
The Guinness-recognized record for remembered digits of π is 67,890 digits, held by Lu Chao, a 24-year-old graduate student from China.[35] It took him 24 hours and 4 minutes to recite to the 67,890th decimal place of π without an error
Stu's pi page
OF ALL THE ONE'S TESTED
THE FASTEST PI PROGRAM
that will run on your PC is....
http://home.istar.ca/~lyster/pi.html
Software for calculating pi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Softwar...ulating_%CF%80
Last edited by -X-hellfire; 08-02-2008 at 07:50 AM.
Gigabyte P35-DQ6 - rev 1.0, F7 bios | Kentsfield Q6600 G0 - 2.4 @ 3.200 Ghz, 400x8, Vcore 1.300V | Corsair HX-620W PSU | Realtek HD audio 7.1 mb | SATA: 0-3:4x1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3 in RAID 10, 64k stripe on Intel Matrix Storage Manager with volume c:128GB, d:1.7TB, 4:250 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO, nonraid: SATA: 5:1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F1 on Gigabyte SATA2/Jmicron | usb3:Silverstone EC04P- (1x-pcie) | SATA:Rocket 620 (4x-pcie) | XFX 8800GTS FATAL1TY 320MB RAM | Corsair XMS DDR2 PC6400 5-5-5-18 2 x 2x2048 8GB kit @ 800MHz +( default )V in bios | ThermalRight Ultra EXTREME 120 + Noctua NF-P12 120mm fan | 27" QNIX 2710LED, IBM P97 19" gone bad | Samsung SH-203N DVD; firmware SB01 | Logitech MX1000 + MX600 Laser Mouse, Comfort Cordless Keyboard | Dlink DIR-855 Firewall wireless 100/10, DWA-556 (300N) | 2 x T-Balancer XL fancontroller with 8 fans on Attenuators| 3 x Noctua NF-P12 120mm, NF-R8 80mm, CT80 80mm, 2xPanaflo 80mm | case1: CM Stacker T01 | OS: 1:Windows XP Pro, 2:64-bit 3:Win 8.1 64-bit 4:Win 7 64-bit | case2: CM HAF 932 | Corsair HX-520W PSU
...would it then be possible to archive supercomputer performance on a pc?
but mostly pi don't need more than 100 digits anyway in any practical purposes...
so what is it useful for?
Gigabyte P35-DQ6 - rev 1.0, F7 bios | Kentsfield Q6600 G0 - 2.4 @ 3.200 Ghz, 400x8, Vcore 1.300V | Corsair HX-620W PSU | Realtek HD audio 7.1 mb | SATA: 0-3:4x1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3 in RAID 10, 64k stripe on Intel Matrix Storage Manager with volume c:128GB, d:1.7TB, 4:250 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO, nonraid: SATA: 5:1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F1 on Gigabyte SATA2/Jmicron | usb3:Silverstone EC04P- (1x-pcie) | SATA:Rocket 620 (4x-pcie) | XFX 8800GTS FATAL1TY 320MB RAM | Corsair XMS DDR2 PC6400 5-5-5-18 2 x 2x2048 8GB kit @ 800MHz +( default )V in bios | ThermalRight Ultra EXTREME 120 + Noctua NF-P12 120mm fan | 27" QNIX 2710LED, IBM P97 19" gone bad | Samsung SH-203N DVD; firmware SB01 | Logitech MX1000 + MX600 Laser Mouse, Comfort Cordless Keyboard | Dlink DIR-855 Firewall wireless 100/10, DWA-556 (300N) | 2 x T-Balancer XL fancontroller with 8 fans on Attenuators| 3 x Noctua NF-P12 120mm, NF-R8 80mm, CT80 80mm, 2xPanaflo 80mm | case1: CM Stacker T01 | OS: 1:Windows XP Pro, 2:64-bit 3:Win 8.1 64-bit 4:Win 7 64-bit | case2: CM HAF 932 | Corsair HX-520W PSU
It's not useful for anything, jeez. It's just neat to see how fast our GPUs can calculate Pi.
Is there any use in running SuperPI over and over, or 3dmark over and over? No, it's just fun to test.
Bookmarks