I just tried to validate a score to se if it was fake.
It claime it was incorrect. WOW cheaters....
But what every I try and Validate I get incorrect checksum
http://www.xtremesystems.com/pi/
So Now everybody can cheat in superpi?
I just tried to validate a score to se if it was fake.
It claime it was incorrect. WOW cheaters....
But what every I try and Validate I get incorrect checksum
http://www.xtremesystems.com/pi/
So Now everybody can cheat in superpi?
There's a problem in the validator's code ( AFAIR ).
Shall be fixed in the near(?) future
Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.
-Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.
Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P.), Juan J. Guerrero
It's been down for like 6 months...... how near?
EVGA z68 FTW
i7 2600k @ 4.8
8gb DDR3 1600
3x GTX 580 3gb HydroCopper2
Silverstone Strider 1500W
Areca 1880i w/ 6x intel x25m
On water
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
Apparently this is on FUGGER's radar
Prodigy Yang i5 3570K | Asrock Z77-E ITX | 8GB Samsung 30nm | 7950 TF3 | 240GB OCZ Agility 3 RAID 0 Apogee HD White | NexXxos 120 | XSPC X20 750 Pump/Res ![]()
Damn its sad that this havent been fixed before the "QF cheat-edition" was developed... (Sorry if Im wrong, word on the street is that its developed within QF program)
selecting time and then "running"... wuhuuu?
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
Bill... It trobles me that I've just got a new tweak, which should allow around 44500-44900 PP in 1M.... And I just dont know how to prove Im not cheating.... I think I will record a video of OS booting up, SPI 1.5 being transfered from USB to HDD, and then run it, without any cuts in video....
We're having a competition in Denmark...![]()
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
Just run it and post the screenshots. A video really proves nothing as there is no way to know what may be happening behind the scenes while Windows is loading. If your tweaks are that good, as others have found out before you, the whiners will still scream cheat. At the end of the day hwbot or whatever is just icing on the cake. All that really matters is you and those you consider close know what you have accomplished.
If your post is non-technical in nature and I do not reply most likely you have joined other trolls in my ignore list.
Thanks Praz.
I, and the ones who are close to me, know that I ran the 100m in 6,8s yesterday. No one accepts my score, but I know I have the WR ...
2008: MOA Belgium #2 || MOA EU #5
2009: MOA Benelux #2 || GOOC Benelux/DACH #1 || GOOC EU #1 || GOOC WW #4 || Tweaking #1 (2/2) || AROS #QF
2010: P55 OC Challenge EU #7 || MOA Benelux #1 || MOA EU #4 || GOOC EU #1 || MOA WW #12 || GOOC WW #11
2011: MOA Benelux #1 || MOA EU #8
Things I write: Critical thinking - Should Maximus V Extreme be banned from competitive overclocking?, HWBOT Vision 2012, The Industry's Social Responsibilities - Support the Community., In Response to Chew's Goodbye Note (the unhealthy relation between company and community), The X58A-OC, the enthusiast community and a long-term vision, The Efficiency Rating, Hardware sharing, nostra culpa?, The paradox of a fair overclocking competition, HWBOT Memory Index v0.1, AMD Thuban Voltage and Temperature Scaling, Is LN2 on GPU really worth the trouble?
Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.
-Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.
Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P.), Juan J. Guerrero
hehe...
Guys, no trolling, no trolling![]()
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
It is sad to see fake Pi versions.....I don't care who made it, sadly there are always going to be cheaters in any area of interest. BUT.....making a new flawless version should be what the original developers should concentrate on, and that is not happening. That makes me even more sad..... The validator is not working for so long with a reason.....and it is not hard to understand why....BUT......when you see that the Checksum is easy to brake....and when fakes are on the loose....something should be done....And unfortunately that hasn't happened in more than a year....That is really wrong...
I think that nobody should cry "cheater" until a true way of checking the authenticity of a result is made.
There's no ideal solution.
One good idea would be a new SuperPi version with integrated CPU-z ( to gather CPU, RAM, Frequencies & Timings ), new validation code routine, and having the CPU & RAM frequency & timings as a part of the validation code generation algorithm.
No more downlclocking, etc.
Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.
-Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.
Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P.), Juan J. Guerrero
I'd say even more.
The more complex, the better![]()
Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.
-Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.
Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P.), Juan J. Guerrero