X58 Intel chipset drivers

[Richard Dower]

Series 9 chipset drivers which included X58...these drivers have been used in recent reviews for some P45 boards, version 9.0.0.1007

http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe

http://www.station-drivers.com/forum...hp?p=8539#8539


New pack of drivers "Chipset Device Software" Version 9.0.0.1007 for the recognition of new & old chipsets INTEL (see list complete Ci below).

Here some information of the package: version 9.0.0.1007
Dates from the drivers: 26/03/2008
WHQL: yes
Official: not
Information: The assumption of responsibility of new Chipset X58 (ICH10 Serie)allows
For: I8xxx/i9xx/P3x/X3x/48x/X5x (Ich7/8/9/10)
Under: Microsoft Windows * Server 2003
Microsoft Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition *
Microsoft Windows XP Professional x64 Edition *
Microsoft Windows XP
Microsoft Windows 2000
Microsoft Windows Vista
Microsoft Windows Server 2008
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 x64 Edition
Multi languages: yes

[Hornet331]

New pack of drivers "Chipset Device Software" Version 9.0.0.1007 for the recognition of new & old chipsets INTEL (see list complete Ci below).

Here some information of the package: version 9.0.0.1007
Dates from the drivers: 26/03/2008
WHQL: yes
Official: not
Information: The assumption of responsibility of new Chipset X58 (ICH10 Serie)allows
For: I8xxx/i9xx/P3x/X3x/48x/X5x (Ich7/8/9/10)
Under: Microsoft Windows * Server 2003
Microsoft Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition *
Microsoft Windows XP Professional x64 Edition *
Microsoft Windows XP
Microsoft Windows 2000
Microsoft Windows Vista
Microsoft Windows Server 2008
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 x64 Edition
Multi languages: yes

either typo or fake, i guess the later one, wheres the P4x... funny they include allready the X5x but not the upcoming P4x drivers.

[Richard Dower]

I looked in the .inf files, there is P45 support for sure...a couple of reviews i have seen used these drivers on the P45 mobo review.

What about this?

PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3418.DeviceDesc="Intel(R) Quickpath Interconnect Physical Layer Port 0 – 3418"
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3419.DeviceDesc="Intel(R) Quickpath Interconnect Physical Layer Port 1 – 3419"
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3420.DeviceDesc="Intel(R) QuickPath Architecture I/O Hub PCI Express Root Port 0 – 3420"
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3421.DeviceDesc="Intel(R) QuickPath Architecture I/O Hub PCI Express Root Port 0 – 3421"
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3422.DeviceDesc="Intel(R) QuickPath Architecture I/O Hub GPIO and Scratch Pad Registers - 3422"
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3423.DeviceDesc="Intel(R) QuickPath Architecture I/O Hub Control Status and RAS Registers - 3423"
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3425.DeviceDesc="Intel(R) QuickPath Interconnect Physical and Link Layer Registers Port 0 - 3425"
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3426.DeviceDesc="Intel(R) QuickPath Interconnect Routing and Protocol Layer Registers Port 0 - 3426"
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3427.DeviceDesc="Intel(R) QuickPath Interconnect Physical and Link Layer Registers Port 1 - 3427"
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3428.DeviceDesc="Intel(R) QuickPath Interconnect Routing & Protocol Layer Register Port 1 - 3428"
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_342d.DeviceDesc="Intel(R) QuickPath Architecture I/O Hub I/OxAPIC Interrupt Controller - 342D"
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_342e.DeviceDesc="Intel(R) QuickPath Architecture I/O Hub System Management Registers - 342E"
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_342f.DeviceDesc="Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology Registers - 342F"
PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_3438.DeviceDesc="Intel(R) QuickPath Architecture I/O Hub Throttle Registers - 3438"


Quickpath...isin't that X58?

[Richard Dower]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Q...h_Interconnect

[hersounds]

something curious,when install this drivers the system don't boot anymore...changing the sata cables place in mobo and boot again and now yes,run perfect

this happen with windows vista home premium SP1 and my signature machine

[virtualrain]

It's not unreasonable for early drivers to start appearing. ES samples will need to be tested with something.

EDIT: Reviewing the driver package personally, revealed a reference to IntelIOH.inf and IntelCPU.inf which definitely contains items related to QuickPath (Nehalem's new interconnect). However, there was no reference in the driver package to X58 so for those looking at this as further validation of the new Nehalem Chipset's name, I would caution that there is no such supporting evidence here. Can we just call it Tylersburg until an official name is announced?

Nehalem FAQ

-Chris.

[BrowncoatGR]

PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_342f.DeviceDesc="Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology Registers - 342F" WTH?

[Hornet331]

PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_342f.DeviceDesc="Intel(R) Trusted Execution Technology Registers - 342F" WTH?

where do you ahve been the last 5 years... its nothing more then TCPA/TCG, but as long as there is no TPM chip on the mobo TXT its useless anyway.

[Hornet331]

Istanbul is both on EU and Asia.

lol wrong thread.