64 ROPs ?
Nope, don't think so.
Looks like somebody gathered various info available on the net and "compiled" a GPU-z screenshot.
64 ROPs ?
Nope, don't think so.
Looks like somebody gathered various info available on the net and "compiled" a GPU-z screenshot.
Yes, 64 ROPs@695MHz would be overkill even for 160GB/s, but maybe this is Nvidias "fix" for the slow 8xAA resolve
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
I may have missed some posts but wasnt this gonna be 55nm?
Oh blah?
Nope.
G92b is 55nm.
GT200 is 65nm.
Hmm but maybe this is GPU-Z bug only? Do you emember the GF8600 aka G84 screenshots? GPU-Z showed that it has 64SP even it was real G84 and a few weeks after (in new version of GPU-Z) it showed a correct value - 32SP. Maybe there is the same problem and with newer version of GPU-Z there will be 32ROPs?Originally Posted by BenchZowner
That would be a shot in the foot.
That brings GT200 to super die-size, TDP bigger then R600 TDP was and invalidate any X2 variant.
So GT200 have to fight R700=2xRV770 witch wont be easy to win.
GT200 is under 600mm2 ( yes, it's big )
It'll be a decent heater for those cold winter nights ( more than likely ).
But it'll be a monster performance-wise.
And a 55nm refresh shall be out in 3 to 6 months ( as usual )
By that time ATI could be playing in 45nm, and that´s a whole new story because it´s a new full node and not one half-node of 65nm.
GT200 could be a monster in performance but don´t forget that it will have to fight R700 witch is 2x RV770. 1GPU versus 2GPU
But yes it could be a monster in performance single GPU. No doubt about that.
Last edited by v_rr; 04-27-2008 at 06:22 AM.
Man... If these turn out to be quite a bit better than the G92 then I hope eVGA extends the step up to 4 months again or that it comes out before July 6th!
Is it 100% confirmed what you`re saying there?
BTW. I`ve read on Chiphell Forum that GT200 is about 2xRv770 performance according to reliable sources
Nothing can be confirmed 100% right now.
And even if it was possible, it would be very hard ( for the person ) to let it go in public.
He didn't mention anything about 55nm GT200, but logic says max 6 months after initial release, the 55nm refresh should arrive.
that was 6800ultra i think
at 600mm2 it will use more power and be hotter than a 2900xt
i have the feeling that the single cored 9900gtx will be competitive with the 4870x2
DFI P965-S/core 2 quad q6600@3.2ghz/4gb gskill ddr2 @ 800mhz cas 4/xfx gtx 260/ silverstone op650/thermaltake xaser 3 case/razer lachesis
Would be bad for Nvidia if not cause RV770 is said to be ~250mm² while GT200 should be about 500-600mm². RadenValue770 has other tasks than GT200.
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
But perform miles faster. I'll take performance over power draw anytime, as would anybody interested in "Xtreme" Systems.
Whether or not that matters depends on pricing. It can go both ways.
If the 9900GTX is $499, it will need to be faster than a price-cut 9800GX2 to jusify its price. If it is around $399, it has the ability to catch the 4870 off-guard, but presents a dilemma where it would be slower than the 9800 GX2, but significantly faster than one 9800GTX. At $299, it will try to decisively outclass the 9800GTX in an effort for Nvidia to usher in a new 9900GX2 for the performance crown.
With pricing and final specs in the air, Nvidia has past performance on its back helping it to scare up engineers at AMD into thinking the GT-200 is an insane chip, which is great for us consumers who will get the best performance at the lowest price
As per ATI pricing and for a glimpse of what kind of performance they are aiming for, the 4870 should end up faster than the 9800 GTX and the 4870 X2 should end up faster than the 9800 GX2. That may be wishful thinking but ATI wants to survive next round that is a bare minimum.
Perkam
The 9900 gtx will be 1gb 512 bit?
From the Rumors, it seems so.
Sound: Asus Essense ST | Wharfedale Diamond 9.1 | Norge 2060 Stereo amp | Wharfedale SW150 sub (coming soon)
Camera Gear: Canon 6D | Canon 500D | Canon 17-40L | Canon 24-105L | Canon 50mm f1.4 | Canon 85mm f1.8 | Rokinon 14mm f2.8 | Sigma 10-20EX HSM | Benro A3580F + Vanguard SBH250 | Bag full of filters and stuff
Like I said.
1.6 TeraFLOPS
160GB/s bandwidth
DirectX 10.1/Shader Model 4.1
Somebody "compiled" this screenshot.
W1zzard, the author of GPU-z confirmed what I said in another thread ( got deleted I think ).
It's pathetic what people do nowadays to boost their website's traffic
Exciting thread!
More tough decisions to make if building a new rig soon...
Do i get an 9600GT/ 8800GT to last until the 9900GTX/GTS are out or do I just buy a 8800GTS/9800GTX that will last me a year or more?!
Damn Technology!
Hm.. Thank god
Agreed totally, they should beIt's pathetic what people do nowadays to boost their website's traffic
Oh blah?
Don't raise your hopes ( it wouldn't be beneficial in reality as well ) high enough.Hm.. Thank god
Because the info regarding the memory used is nearly "concrete". ( fast GDDR3 )
I am just hoping for something that better that I can step up to from a 9800GX2, and that is comes out before June 24.Whether or not that matters depends on pricing. It can go both ways.
If the 9900GTX is $499, it will need to be faster than a price-cut 9800GX2 to jusify its price. If it is around $399, it has the ability to catch the 4870 off-guard, but presents a dilemma where it would be slower than the 9800 GX2, but significantly faster than one 9800GTX. At $299, it will try to decisively outclass the 9800GTX in an effort for Nvidia to usher in a new 9900GX2 for the performance crown.
With pricing and final specs in the air, Nvidia has past performance on its back helping it to scare up engineers at AMD into thinking the GT-200 is an insane chip, which is great for us consumers who will get the best performance at the lowest price
As per ATI pricing and for a glimpse of what kind of performance they are aiming for, the 4870 should end up faster than the 9800 GTX and the 4870 X2 should end up faster than the 9800 GX2. That may be wishful thinking but ATI wants to survive next round that is a bare minimum.
Perkam
Overclocking- The dangerous act of increasing temperatures and voltages in a small metal box and pontentially destroying thousands of dollars of equipment, while one's fate is transmitted to a small rectangle.
-X38 Maximus Formula SE
-X3350 @ 3.4Ghz
-Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme
-Crucial Tracer 2gb 6400 (1067 5-4-3-12 2t)
-TT ToughPower 750W
-750GB WD7500AAKS
-Creative Audigy 2 ZS
-Pioneer DVR-A09-XLB
-Coolermaster Cosmos
-NEC EA231wmi
-EVGA 285GTX
the following is an approximation of my thoughts in july 2008:
holy crap, 9900gtx is beast. it will cost $599, 4870x2 and 9800gx2 wont touch it, it embodies the change you would expect from a new generation of cards....but it isnt lol, still a geforce 9. expect nvidia to have the best enthusiast card for another year or so. also, on the features front, hardware physics is nice.
Last edited by grimREEFER; 04-27-2008 at 09:14 PM.
DFI P965-S/core 2 quad q6600@3.2ghz/4gb gskill ddr2 @ 800mhz cas 4/xfx gtx 260/ silverstone op650/thermaltake xaser 3 case/razer lachesis
Bookmarks