Has Phenom been ready since day 1 ???
Are the mobo manufacturer's and M$ in COLLUSION , w/ the intel smell?
It wouldn't surprise me.
Has Phenom been ready since day 1 ???
Are the mobo manufacturer's and M$ in COLLUSION , w/ the intel smell?
It wouldn't surprise me.
Bruno's Junker
OPTY 165 @ 2.9G
ASSROCK 939Dual Sata2
512mb Xerox Samsung PC2100
512mb Corsair PC3200 Value Ram
Ancient HDD, CDRW, DVD and Floppy
Antique Gateway ATX Tower (cover not included)
I don't understand the meaning of this post. Care to enlighten?
Asus P5b Deluxe
Gskill 2X2GB DDR2 6400
saphire 4870 + MCW60
e6600 @ 380x8 + DTEK Fuzion Rev 2
Asus Xonar PCI-E
Sunbeam Transformer *Modded
Corsair HX520 PSU
2x BIX with 2 Yates each, both mounted on exterior
MCP655-B with Tachometer
WD Black 640g
WTF is this about? Makes no sense at all "Step away from the bong "
Mine: i5 2500k @ 4.7gig - CM 212+ - GTX570 - Giga P67A-UD4 - 2 x 4gig Ripjaws 1600Mhz - OCZ vertex 2 120g - Corsair TX750 - Antec 300
Wifies : Asrock 880GMH - Phenom II B50@3.5 gig - Gskill 2 x 2gig DDR3 1333 - HIS 5770 - 74g Raptor - CM TX3 - Vantec 620w PSU
Kids: Asus M4N68 - Athlon x2 3800+ - 2 x 2gig Kingston - 8800GTS - CM TX3 - 74gig raptor - TT 550w
Nono... pass the bong to me then step away... slowly.
Didn't MS just drio their Vista compatible thingy. Yeah wtf are you talking about? If AMD did something mobo manufacturers would step it up. AMD would design the chipset and the processor not sure how anyone is keeping them down here. They did just buy ATI a while ago too.
i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.
XP SP3 / vista SP1 and forcing the "TLB fix" to on regardless of bios settings is a bit on the iffy side (supposed to only happen on the B2 but I think someone said it was affecting even his B3). That's the only somewhat suspicious thing I see.
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
Intel and M$ apologists please refrain from posting in this thread.
Bruno's Junker
OPTY 165 @ 2.9G
ASSROCK 939Dual Sata2
512mb Xerox Samsung PC2100
512mb Corsair PC3200 Value Ram
Ancient HDD, CDRW, DVD and Floppy
Antique Gateway ATX Tower (cover not included)
if what he is refering to has anything to do with the last thread on this subject then i am all for it.
two of them inside the black expanse of there worlds.
its all there fault really, hears hopeing it turns out well.
shameless post for increased post count warning
You know, there is a reason why most of computer history has been called the Wintel dynasty. And yes, the mobo makers will drag there feet when it comes to support for anyone that isn't Intel, or the top end on performance. You can see that on lack of support for Phenom in certain am2 board bios's. Well, not certain, the vast majority. Now as far as XP sp3, I know the final rc I have didn't have the tlb fix. If the release version does, I'm betting there is some kind of a registry key or something in the admin rights that needs to be changed to disable it. Probably the same for Vista.
But, theres been BS going on for a loooong time in the computer industry even before phenom.
AMD Phenom X4 9850BE
ZeroTherm Nirvana 120 cpu cooler
MSI K9A2 Platinum Bios P.0J
4GB Mushkin (2x2) DDR2 1066 (PC8500) CL5-5-5-15 2v
Sapphire Toxic edition Radeon HD3870
2 x 320GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 in Raid 0
80GB Western Digital Caviar IDE For driver and file backups.
Raidmax RX-700SS 700w psu (possible weak link in OC equation)
TLB patch isn't on on my Vista and Server 08 systems by default.
But I did think Microsoft took for freaking ever to get anything done on XP64 when AMD launched their A64 chips. They barely did anything until Intel started having good 64-bit support.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
oli_ramsay, you are off to a very bad move.
Bookmarks