Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31

Thread: Mini review: 3870X2 Game performance

  1. #1
    Nice Hardware!!!
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Finland/Tampere
    Posts
    1,846

    Mini review: 3870X2 Game performance

    I did my own game tests, cause all game reviews, that I have red, gives very different results. Well, this is my approach to 3870X2 gaming performance.

    We all have seen tons of pictures about these cards, so there is only pic of setup and game test table.

    Windows Vista 32-bit
    QX9650 @ 4GHz (10x400)
    G.Skill DDR3 7-6-5-12 (2T) 1600MHz
    Asus P5E3 WS Pro
    Asus 3870X2 (900MHz/1000MHz in all tests)


    System:


    Drivers:


    All game game tests are done with Fraps and in game. I was trying to play normally, so these framerates are quite real.

    Resolution is 1920x1200 in all game tests and Driver settings are set to High Quality.



    Lost Planet: Snow(lower score)/Cave(higher score)
    NFS Pro street: Really bad performance. Driver problem.
    Flatout 2 and Oblivion: 60fps cap.
    Dark messiah: Only one core in use.


    Few Crysis pictures (Click):



    Last edited by SF3D; 02-13-2008 at 12:02 PM.
    You are as good as your samples are!

  2. #2
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    10009
    Posts
    3,628
    What blocks are those on the gpu's?
    Last edited by trans am; 02-13-2008 at 11:52 AM.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Sofia,Bulgaria
    Posts
    102
    I don't see the version of Catalyst driver used for the review .

    Cat 8.2 is released .

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by trans am View Post
    What blocks are those on the gpu's?
    MCW30 chipset coolers it would appear.

  5. #5
    Nice Hardware!!!
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Finland/Tampere
    Posts
    1,846
    Yes. MCW30 blocks. Not very good performance, but these are cool cards and blocks are easy to mount on this

    Drivers updated to first post.
    You are as good as your samples are!

  6. #6
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    10009
    Posts
    3,628
    wow! very cool use of chipset coolers.
    how are your temps compared to the stock cooler?

  7. #7
    Nice Hardware!!!
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Finland/Tampere
    Posts
    1,846
    Temperature is always under 50C with these blocks. 48C is max temperature while playing Crysis for example. So, these beat the stock cooler, but not much.

    I have pair of MCW60 blocks, but there is no way to mount them on 3870X2.
    You are as good as your samples are!

  8. #8
    Wuf
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Finland/Tampere
    Posts
    2,400
    Haha u can mount chipset blocks to GPU and GPU block to X38 NB
    But but SF3D what is dimension between HD3870 X2 cooler mounting holes =)?
    You use IRC and Crunch in Xs WCG team? Join #xs.wcg @ Quakenet
    [22:53:09] [@Jaco-XS] i'm gonna overclock this damn box!
    Ze gear:
    Main rig: W3520 + 12GB ddr3 + Gigabyte X58A-UD3R rev2.0! + HD7970 + HD6350 DMS59 + HX520 + 2x X25-E 32gig R0 + Bunch of HDDs.
    ESXI: Dell C6100 XS23-TY3 Node - 1x L5630 + 24GB ECC REG + Brocade 1020 10GbE
    ZFS Server: Supermicro 826E1 + Supermicro X8DAH+-F + 1x L5630 + 24GB ECC REG + 10x 3TB HDDs + Brocade 1020 10GbE
    Lappy!: Lenovo Thinkpad W500: T9600 + 8GB + FireGL v5700 + 128GB Samsung 830 + 320GB 2.5" in ze dvd slot + 1920x1200 @ 15.4"


  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    164
    Nice review. But why fps cap in oblivion? You can disable vsync in options (at launcher menu).

  10. #10
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    10009
    Posts
    3,628
    What's your max overclock with that card?

  11. #11
    Nice Hardware!!!
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Finland/Tampere
    Posts
    1,846
    Solid- Distance is ~42mm and from corner to corner ~55mm
    L7R- It didn't wor for some reason. Drivers maybe?

    Trans am- Check this: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697731
    972/1100 with normal watercooling and 1.45V.
    You are as good as your samples are!

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    71
    Are the Crysis settings on High or Very High?
    Desktop and Gaming PC

    CPU: AMD Phenom II 940 - TESTING
    Motherboard: ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe - BIOS0703
    RAM: Transcend aXeRam 2x2GB 5-5-5-15
    GPU: HD4870 512MB
    Case: Coolermaster HAF
    PSU: Enermax Revolution85+ 1050W
    Storage: 2x250GB Seagate SATA2 Raid0 + Samsung Spinpoint 1TB
    Cooling: Custom Water with Triple Radi for CPU+Mainboard

  13. #13
    Nice Hardware!!!
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Finland/Tampere
    Posts
    1,846
    DX10 is only available on very high settings. So, it's very high and 1920x1200. No AA obviously
    You are as good as your samples are!

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    71
    SF3D,
    I guess that's not exactly the point.
    You say:
    Quote Originally Posted by SF3D View Post
    DX10 is only available on very high settings. So, it's very high and 1920x1200. No AA obviously
    I say: (at least real) Very High Settings are only available on Dx10

    Do you get it?
    Thank you anyway for your review!
    Last edited by oc_junkY; 02-14-2008 at 10:47 AM.
    Desktop and Gaming PC

    CPU: AMD Phenom II 940 - TESTING
    Motherboard: ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe - BIOS0703
    RAM: Transcend aXeRam 2x2GB 5-5-5-15
    GPU: HD4870 512MB
    Case: Coolermaster HAF
    PSU: Enermax Revolution85+ 1050W
    Storage: 2x250GB Seagate SATA2 Raid0 + Samsung Spinpoint 1TB
    Cooling: Custom Water with Triple Radi for CPU+Mainboard

  15. #15
    Nice Hardware!!!
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Finland/Tampere
    Posts
    1,846
    Quote Originally Posted by oc_junkY View Post
    I guess that's not exactly the point.

    I say: (at least real) Very High Settings are only available on Dx10

    Do you get it?


    Ok. Is this relevant for the review?
    You are as good as your samples are!

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    449
    Thanks for the review man, we need more of these real in-game results.

    COD4 average seem pretty low. Wonder how these results stand up to a 8800 Ultra..

    edit:

    quick test

    company of heroes dx9
    xp 32bit
    1680x1050 max details no aa

    8400 4.0ghz
    8800 gtx 675/1458/1000
    2x1gb 44412

    avg: 113
    max: 251
    min: 41

    so your results on vista and 1920x1200 are pretty sweet.. tempted to sell my gtx and go 3870x2, but i guess ill just wait for the 9800gtx instead in a couple of months
    Last edited by higgins; 02-14-2008 at 12:07 PM.
    E8400, P5Q-E, Crucial 2x2GB , XFX 8800GTX , Corsair HX620W
    D-TEK Fuzion, MCW60, Thermochill PA120.2, MCP655

  17. #17
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Grinchville Embassy; Santa Cruz, Aruba
    Posts
    599
    is prostreet some graphic intensive?
    its like the car version of crysis

  18. #18
    Nice Hardware!!!
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Finland/Tampere
    Posts
    1,846
    Higgins- Thanks! Cod4 level was quite intensive and long viewing distances. If I look the walls or sky, fps would have been really high I think that is worst case scenario.

    71 (Bryan) Not at all. It looks like s**t and performance is the same.

    Edit:

    Crysis UPDATE:

    Windows Vista 32-bit
    QX9650 4.2GHz (1.43V)
    4GB DDR3 7-6-6-12 (1T)
    3870X2 918/1000
    1920x1200 Very High DX10. No AA

    From fraps:
    2008-02-15 01:39:45 - Crysis
    Frames: 8813 - Time: 268893ms - Avg: 32.775 - Min: 12 - Max: 48

    Minimum framerate is 12, cause there was "save game" period during gameplay.
    Last edited by SF3D; 02-14-2008 at 03:56 PM.
    You are as good as your samples are!

  19. #19
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Brasilia - DF - Brazil
    Posts
    741
    show us more pictures of the blocks installed!
    did you use the stock ramsinks? do the blocks fit in the space without mod anything?
    great job on that.
    My Lian Li G70
    Asus P6X58D-E * i7-930 * Saphire 7970 * 6GB Corsair XMS3 1600 C7 * Crucial M4 256GB SSD * Lian Li G70W Powdercoated
    Watercooled by single loop Coolgate Quad 120 + Swiftech MCR220 with San Aces H1011 * EK Supreme HF * Koolance VID-AR797 * EK Asus X58 full set * DDC 3.25 with EK Dual Top/Res

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    71
    Does anyone know a review where the cards is tested on PCIe 1.x and 2.0 ?
    The difference would be interesting.
    I just found something (sorry it's german) with the standard 3870:
    http://media.bestofmicro.com/Grafikk...Y-71782-15.jpg
    Desktop and Gaming PC

    CPU: AMD Phenom II 940 - TESTING
    Motherboard: ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe - BIOS0703
    RAM: Transcend aXeRam 2x2GB 5-5-5-15
    GPU: HD4870 512MB
    Case: Coolermaster HAF
    PSU: Enermax Revolution85+ 1050W
    Storage: 2x250GB Seagate SATA2 Raid0 + Samsung Spinpoint 1TB
    Cooling: Custom Water with Triple Radi for CPU+Mainboard

  21. #21
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    near Boston, MA, USA
    Posts
    1,955
    Kind of a side topic, since you have both:

    How does "Saturation" under AVIVO compare to Digital Vibrance on the 8800?

  22. #22
    Nice Hardware!!!
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Finland/Tampere
    Posts
    1,846
    leo_bsb: Picture for you

    oc_junkY: I don't think ther is huge difference between 1.0a and 2.0. With high resolutions maybe..

    Anemone: I have no idea, cuase I don't use that stuff. Someone else know this better.



    You have to cut little pieces from cooling plate. 3-4mm is enough with these MCW30 blocks.
    You are as good as your samples are!

  23. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Indonesia - aren hill
    Posts
    99
    thanks for the review SF3D & the wb mounting are very intresting ill work something to mount some chipset wb

    i think i do something wrong on crysis couse i only get ard 20fps high setting 1280x1024 with q66@3,6 def 3870x2 with cat 8.1 patch 1.1 doesnt help hope 8.2 will help

  24. #24
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    26
    Hey,

    Top review, Nice to see some real world performance specs

    Any chance you could do me a favor and measure the two heatsinks that ATI ship stock with the X2, As I think what im gonna do with myne is take the top plastic's off and mount fans directly ontop of the heatsinks.

    Just need to know some measurements

    Thanks again

  25. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    16
    good performance, good cooling
    Biostar TP45
    E8600 @ 4500 1.35v
    Crucial Ballistix Tracer
    Sapphire HD4830
    True120

    HWA TEAM

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •