Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 34 of 34

Thread: A Simple tweak make fsb 1333 into 1600 on 45 nm

  1. #26
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    CT, USA
    Posts
    786
    Quote Originally Posted by M3kk View Post
    Sorry, but its enough a simple tape, to isolate that pins, or need to pus something conductive between them like with 266 @ 333? ( Conductive ink, or something. )

    LE : Done, no conductive pen or ink needed, just isolate that two pins .
    Isn't it one pin?

    Edit: I counted the contacts from the first post....yup, 2. Thanks M3kk ↓
    Last edited by my87csx481; 03-18-2008 at 04:01 PM.

  2. #27
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Romania, Transylvania crazyp.ro
    Posts
    645
    Two
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    3Dmark2006 Score Calculator
    ---------------------------

    "Frequency Unlimit -Enabled'' by DFI

  3. #28
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Kilkenny, Ireland
    Posts
    259
    Does this method work to take a 200mhz fsb chip to 266mhz? or does it need the conductive pen method?

    I want to try it on the e2160 in my Dell server

  4. #29
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,361
    dont see the point of this unless u cant enter BIOS to overclock it, then it is a nice mod
    DFI Lanparty LT X48-T2R
    Intel Q6600 L737B242 ~ VID 1.2125 ~ 4000mhZ @ 1.48 vcore {lapped}
    eVGA 8800GTS (G92) 512MB {stock}
    Crucial Ballistix PC8500 Tracer ~ 1200mhZ 5-5-5-12 @ 2.05v
    Lian Li PC-V1000 {modded}
    Corsair HX 620W
    Creative X-FI ExtremeMusic
    Western Digital Raptor X 150GB
    Thermalright-Ultra120 Xtreme {lapped} ft. Scythe S-Flex SFF21F S-FDB ~ Push & Pull

  5. #30
    IT Engineer in the making
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Former Kingdom of Bavaria
    Posts
    2,094
    Sometimes influencing/chaning the BSEL setting also changes the default strap setting for the NB. That means that on some boards you'll reach higher fsb speeds with CPUs that have a higher default FSB. That's why the mod even can make sense on boards that do have adjustable FSB in BIOS.
    Quote from one of our professors:
    "Reality is hiding in the imaginary part."

  6. #31
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    @ the computer
    Posts
    2,510
    wait so this mod is almost the same as going in the BIOS and manually changing the FSB higher? when doing this mod, would you have to increase the vcore also for more stability?

  7. #32
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Braga, Portugal
    Posts
    345
    Quote Originally Posted by conzymaher View Post
    Does this method work to take a 200mhz fsb chip to 266mhz? or does it need the conductive pen method?

    I want to try it on the e2160 in my Dell server
    Not likely. Each BSEL mod is different, depending on starting FSB. You should search the specific mod for it. Search the forum, there are plenty 200>266 FSB BSEL mod threads available, and also 266>333 (and before you ask, yes, at least theoretically you can make a 200MHz FSB CPU work at 400MHz just by doing a - rather major - BSEL mod).

    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteFireDragon View Post
    wait so this mod is almost the same as going in the BIOS and manually changing the FSB higher? when doing this mod, would you have to increase the vcore also for more stability?
    Well, it's just about the same thing, altough you can get a strap change with a BSEL mod you might not get doing a regular overclock, and that strap change could allow more OC room. That's not very common, to my knowledge, though.

    As for the vCore issue, it really depends on the chip. There have been reports of E1xxx. E2xxx and E4xxx to go wild on the FSB (266+, sometimes even more, especially with the E1200) with stock vCore. I've also read reports on Q6600 G0 chips being perfectly able to boot at stock voltages, even after a 266>333 FSB BSEL mod. My guess is these 45nm parts wouldn't even flinch by changing the FSB to 400MHz, but that really depends on the chip itself.

    In related news, it's good to see someone already messing around with the BSEL of new chips. Which reminds me... Isn't 1.6GHz like the lowest CPU speed Intel wants people to use? I mean, that's the lowest speed you can get these days (SLFM-enabled notebook models and 200-series Celerons aside, of course), which would in turn mean Intel could very likely fully downward unlock their 1600MHz FSB CPUs and still remain with VERY powerfull parts, albeit even cooler. And if SLFM (which halves the FSB speed) would be added to those parts, then we'd probably have sub-5W parts on idle, and some of them could even be made to be sub-15W regular desktop ones... yikes!

    Cheers.

    Miguel
    Don't forget to visit http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...play.php?f=214. Stop wasting CPU cycles and FOLD. Put your extra CPU power for a good use.

  8. #33
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    42
    I can't see the picture and super interested in trying this.... On my Intel Xeon X5450 3ghz quad from 1333 to 1600 ... 12MB cache and 3.6Ghz per core would be nice.

    Once I see the pic on which pin exactly i'll try this. If all works out well, I may pickup the X5470 3.33Ghz chip from 1333 to 1600 for a sweet 4.00Ghz per core now that would be sick.

    -Intel Core i7 930 @ 4.6Ghz max (Lapped)
    -Cocage True Spirit w/ Scythe Ultra Kaze 120mm (Lapped) *Indigo Extreme* 60-70C at 4.2 - 70-80C at 4.6
    -6GB OCZ DDR3-1600 @ DDR3-1600
    -ASUS RAMPAGE II GENE
    -SLI GeForce GTX 470 @ 851Mhz Core, 1702Mhz Shader, 1875Mhz Memory @ pulling a solid 68GPixel/s and 96GTexel/s = Outperforming a stock Titan (60Gpixel/s) - 640 bit total memory width - 300GB/s Memory on the GTX470's
    -2X WD1001FALS Black Edition,2X RAID0 SEAGATE 250GB, WD 2TB
    -Lian Li PC-V354 Case - **Custom Modding In Progress**
    -Kingwin 1000W Power Supply
    -Creative Sound Blaster X-FI Xtreme Gamer w/ Audigy 2 ZS Live! Drive w/ HDMI audio & SPDIF OPTICAL Out.
    -PIONEER VSX-520-K HOME THEATER 3D HIGH DEFINITION RECEIVER
    -Dayton Audio Dayton HTP-3 5.1 Home Theater Package 12" Powered Subwoofer
    -Samsung LN40B500 40" 1080p LCD HDTV

  9. #34
    V3 Xeons coming soon!
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    36,363
    Quote Originally Posted by chris89 View Post
    I can't see the picture and super interested in trying this.... On my Intel Xeon X5450 3ghz quad from 1333 to 1600 ... 12MB cache and 3.6Ghz per core would be nice.

    Once I see the pic on which pin exactly i'll try this. If all works out well, I may pickup the X5470 3.33Ghz chip from 1333 to 1600 for a sweet 4.00Ghz per core now that would be sick.
    I used SetFSB with a pair of X5470's and ran then at 100% load 24/7 at 3758MHz with stock volts on a SM X7DWA-N board on water but I don't think you can do 5Ghz with out additional voltage
    and that you can't get on a dualie board of that generation. IIRC I got a suicide shot at 3912MHz
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    The XS WCG team needs your support.
    A good project with good goals.
    Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frisch View Post
    If you have lost faith in humanity, then hold a newborn in your hands.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •