Hi VVJ, I just pointed out what happened to rabed25's cpu :Originally posted by VVJ
2rabeb25:
Of course! XP-Rating wasn’t determined because the program showed 128K L2 cache size. XP-Rating is calculated for the known processor cores: Palomino (256K), T-Bred (256K), Barton (512K) and for Thorton (256K) in the latest version. Does WCPUID show 128K L2 cache size as well? Thanks for cooperation!
Here i got one friend that had 64K of L2 from a AthlonXP 1700+ overclocked under a Prommy with 2.2V : my friend fried most of the L2 cache with subzero temperatures.
For the PR, i would like to see a benchmark that shows the barton winning other the normal XP with more cache , i got none that confirm the PR.
Bookmarks