AMD 4X4 FX74*2 @ 3.4G on Air

[VictorWang]

special thx to kevin

AMD 2*FX-74 @ Asus H75
Asus L1N64 WS Pro
Geil 8500 1G*2 Cl4
LT 88GT 512m Mod
Topower 1400w
ambient=12c


single fx74 @ 300*10



4X4 @ 3.36G benchmark suite










this might be AMD Quad WRs ?




TBH, 4X4 FX74*2 is much more better than Phenom Black ED 9600
http://bbs.unihw.com/thread-808-1-1.html

[Lightman]

WOW!

Very nice comparison Victor! Thanks

Your Phenom score looks bad compared to 4x4

I received my 9600BE today, but it was so bad that didn't even load Windows before crashing! Extra volts didn't help either, so RMA


PS. Put 3 Ultras in that RIG Lets see what will happen!

[Noob-ftw]

Wow, the FX74 is finally kicking! Thanks for doing the comparison Victor.

[tictac]

add another 2 memory = NUMA!

[BadNizze]

Very nice! Any chance of some Dice action?

[Oldguy932]

If you're on hwbot you'd win all the benchmarks for the cpu on there for certain. Highest clock on there was by macci and its 3.3 ish, but you have the better memory I think.

[mnewxcv]

pics of setup?

[tvdang7]

damn those things overclock? cool

[KTE]

Nice Victor.

Some guys do have 3.4GHz 4x4 though, which isn't quad core but a dual dual-core setup, so I'm sure someone will have similar scores. Shows AMD quad neeeds speed. I've seen 3.5GHz benched on 4x4 a while back before and 19k Sandra bandwidth. That EVEREST bandwidth is very bad compared to Phenom at much lower MHz/higher timings though. My Phenom gets more at lower settings.

1M: well 2 dual cores, so you're competing in the dual core category since 1M is only single threaded, second processor doesn't even count here. Phenom needs high MHz for those times. If my Phenom did ~3GHz it'd be able to get that time.

[donitsi]

Nice results man!

Too bad I could use that system as my sauna, hot hot hot

[VictorWang]

dont know why, but the mobo seems support only 2.56G memory.
tried almost all kinds of combination but not work
node interactive must be disable to achieve better latency but bandwidth will be lowered a little.

[Lightman]

dont know why, but the mobo seems support only 2.56G memory.
tried almost all kinds of combination but not work
node interactive must be disable to achieve better latency but bandwidth will be lowered a little.

What do you mean by that??

Have you tried 64bit OS?
32bit OS will see only ~3GB of memory depending on extra hardware you're using.

[justapost]

VictorWang: Did you mean node interleaving? If not what is node interactive?

[VictorWang]

o yes, sorry i typed wrong.
node interleaving.

with XP/Vista 32bit, u can at least see 4Gb memory with cpuz even if system can use only 3.25G

but...no matter i use 1G*3, 1G*4, 2G*2 memory on the mobo.
max i can see = 2.56G with cpuz .

so i dont know if this mobo bug or system bug

[Swanie]

I ran a similar setup mid last year and also only saw 2.56 gig's-. Was resolved though installing either XP 64 or Vista 64. Nobody could ever explain as to why the difference compared to "normal" setups . If i remember correctly each set of dimms are for a individual processor ( Dimm 1+2 for CPU 0 and Dimm 3+4 for CPU 1).