8800GT Spec is out! 65NM CONFIRMED !!

[cookerjc]

8800GT has 112SP:

So sorry that our yesterday's news have make some mistakes. Now we are sure that the upcoming 8800GT in the late Oct will only have 112SP version. And it is the downsteam manufactor's decision to producce 256 or 512MB 8800GT. It is said that the final version may have those green stock cooler(the ref. version is black.)

8800GT frequency comfirmed:

8800GS，8800GT，8800GTS all uses 65nm G92 GPU, the difference is the SP number. What's more,we are now sure the 8800GT frequency is 600MHz/1800MHz/1500MHz (core/memory/shader).the prize is between 199~249 USD.

Documents didn't say anything about DX10.1:

So many people are concerning about the DX10.1 support issue. But it is said that the offical document did not mention anything about DX10.1,just saying "Full Microsoft® DirectX® 10 Support" .But we are sure that AMD are preparing more..

Some result leak in the web:

The websiteMobile01 said that 8800GT @ Q6600 can hit a really good score: 3DMark03: 35351/ 3DMark05: 14679

So it is almost all we've got. remember that the release date is Oct.29th.
[FF warning ] original post :http://news.expreview.com/2007-10-11...9687d3904.html

================================================== ============================


like it's expected, the core is smaller.(8800GTS is 42.5X42.5)

And it seems that NV will only have some different graphic memory size versions of G92.

the speed600/900MHz is a bit higher then the typical 8800GTX.

[FF warning ] original post: http://news.expreview.com/2007-10-09...1082d3861.html

[zanzabar]

is it just me or is the page blank, and how many sharers dose it have

[aiya]

still doesn't tell us how many SPs it has.

also i had to scroll to the right to see it, its like off center.

[cookerjc]

maybe NV is hiding some thing
they didnt say anything about shaders

[zanzabar]

im seeing it now, its a full page over to the rite, and why are tehy staying with that heatsink it failed in the previous tests (i remember seeing that sink before)

[cookerjc]

im seeing it now, its a full page over to the rite, and why are tehy staying with that heatsink it failed in the previous tests (i remember seeing that sink before)

oh i understand now...you are using FF....
the site is old enough and doesnt like FF at all.

[Kunaak]

either way, its still better then the 8600 GTS.

128 bit cards need to go away finally.
they hardly qualify for mid range gaming for much more then a few months these days. horrible investments.

[fireice2]

96 or 112 SP's???

(

[zanzabar]

thats strange i havnt seen ff compatibility problems for years, like back in the mozilla days

[strange|ife]

pretty sure its 112 SP correct?

either way this is just a snore until they put out the next honcho card.

[RPGWiZaRD]

No SP numbers => nothing interesting.

I was really excited seeing this topic and then when I check it out it contains only the same old stuff we've known about before.

Hopefully core clock allows for a nice overclock on 65nm considering it's a rather low 600MHz.

[largon]

96 or 112 SP's???

pretty sure its 112 SP correct?

Errr... This is supposed to be SLOWER than 8800GTS.
-> 64 SPs.

the core is smaller.(8800GTS is 42.5X42.5)

That would be the dimensions for the GPU FCPGA package, not the core.

[Face]

Digitimes

Nvidia is bringing forward the launch date of its upcoming GeForce 8800 GT (G92) GPU to October 29 from the original November 12, targeting AMD's new Radeon HD 2950PRO (RV670) as the major competitor, according to sources at graphics card makers.

With G92 and RV670 having a tight performance/price ratio, Nvidia's earlier launch should give the company an advantage in the market, noted the sources.

In addition to G92, Nvidia will also launch the G98 GPU to replace the GeForce 8600 series, however the launch date has not yet been set, added the sources.

[RealTelstar]

Nvidia will also launch the G98 GPU to replace the GeForce 8600 series, however the launch date has not yet been set, added the sources.

Does anybody know more about this one?
I will get it for my new htpc

[BeardyMan]

Yeah what was G92 exactly? it's going to replace 8800GTS? at 65nm? could it beat GTX then at lower temps? Easy 1ghz hitter?hmmm

[`danny]

I think it was made to expand NVIDIA's product line or to replace the 320MB 8800GTS..

[knightwolf654]

now all we need is some info on those g100's or whatever their calling them,

[quadnad]

now all we need is some info on those g100's or whatever their calling them,

yup....the high end is still the only thing I'm interested in. I wish someone would leak some info

[Borgod]

Heres hoping 780i will follow suite

[BenchZowner]

Heres hoping 780i will follow suite

780i = 680i + A extra ( external ) PCI Express 2.0 controller chip.

Not a real upgrade I must say

[Borgod]

780i = 680i + A extra ( external ) PCI Express 2.0 controller chip.

Not a real upgrade I must say

I realise this, but my 680i died last week so I may aswell wait it out.

[K404]

Will it work on a PCI-E1.0 mobo?

[MarlboroMan]

Will it work on a PCI-E1.0 mobo?

+1

same question here

[BenchZowner]

Will it work on a PCI-E1.0 mobo?

Yes

[NH|Delph1]

96 SPs at 1.2 GHz as far as I know

EDIT:
Some say 112 though, but I believe that's the new GTS.

//Andreas