http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/Direct...w-29666-9.html
Makes for pretty dire reading
bring on rv670 (or 680 or whatever its called)
edit: could someonr explain the world in conflict results for test 1 esp. @ 1920x1200 surely the 8800s should scale and not be hit or miss
very dissapointed in the 2900's seriously puts me off buying a pair
anyway as i say i cant wait until next month
Last edited by Yakyb; 10-08-2007 at 03:08 PM.
HD 2x00 is a lot better in DX9 than it is in DX10, ironically.
Perkam
Only because ATi has been playing catch up with NVIDIA and only focusing on the DX9 aspect of their drivers... thus far.Originally Posted by perkam
Core i3-550 Clarkdale @ 4.2GHz, 1.36v (Corsair A50 HS/F) LinX Stable
MSI H55-GD65 Motherboard
G.Skill 4GBRL DDR3-1600 @ 1755, CL9, 1.55v
Sapphire Radeon 5750 1GB
Samsung F4 320GB - WD Green 1TB
Xigmatek Utgard Case - Corsair VX550
Well Nvidia`s DX10 drivers aren`t have a ways to go as well when comparing dx9 vs dx10 frame rates.
Not to mention, Tundra owns you ford-lover
Perkam
Dude, don't diss me till you use the correct apostrophe and not the weird symbol on the Tilda key.Well Nvidia`s DX10 drivers aren`t have a ways to go as well when comparing dx9 vs dx10 frame rates.
Not to mention, Tundra owns you ford-lover
PerkamWhenever I see someone use ` instead of ' I want to beat them down with a ping pong paddle.
Core i3-550 Clarkdale @ 4.2GHz, 1.36v (Corsair A50 HS/F) LinX Stable
MSI H55-GD65 Motherboard
G.Skill 4GBRL DDR3-1600 @ 1755, CL9, 1.55v
Sapphire Radeon 5750 1GB
Samsung F4 320GB - WD Green 1TB
Xigmatek Utgard Case - Corsair VX550
well atleast ati is getting somewhere looking at the performance at release compared to today theyve come a long way.
blasphemy!
Not to mention, Tundra owns you ford-lover
Perkam
----------------------------------------------------
which is why BIOSHOCK does better in DX10...Well Nvidia`s DX10 drivers aren`t have a ways to go as well when comparing dx9 vs dx10 frame rates.
Not to mention, Tundra owns you ford-lover
Perkam
I agree, on both parts of your post
Core i3-550 Clarkdale @ 4.2GHz, 1.36v (Corsair A50 HS/F) LinX Stable
MSI H55-GD65 Motherboard
G.Skill 4GBRL DDR3-1600 @ 1755, CL9, 1.55v
Sapphire Radeon 5750 1GB
Samsung F4 320GB - WD Green 1TB
Xigmatek Utgard Case - Corsair VX550
but can anyone explain the world in conflict results surely it cant be a memory issue otherwise the 640 would have faired a bit better
Gaming Box:: q6600 @3.0 :: 9800gtx :: Abit IP35 :: 4gb :: 1.4TB :: akasa eclipse :: Win7
Development:: PhenomII 955BE @3.2 :: 4200 :: asus M4A785 M Evo :: 1.25TB ::Win7
Media Centre :: q6600 @3.0 :: x1950pro :: asus p35 epu :: 8gb :: 320 GB :: Lc17B :: Win7
server:: I7 860 :: p55 gd65 :: 3450 :: 8 TB :: 8gb :: Rebel 12 :: server 2008 R2
the tundra is only better if ur using ur truck as a car,
but on the benchmarks, the comparisons in company of heros and world in conflict are bs they arnt fully dx10 and are programed to use 120 shaders so it makes no since why some1 would use it as a benchmark
5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks