Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 28

Thread: AMD FIREGL V5600 Review

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084

    AMD FIREGL V5600 Review

    The new AMD FireGL V5600 professional graphics card. Nearly Four weeks ago on launch day we showed what AMD’s new entry level professional graphics card the FireGL V3600 could really achieve. The new FireGL V5600 has most certainly shifted the series of card up a tremendous gear, for an entry level mid range card it has the magical bang for buck.

    One important point of note. No additional power connector is needed to supply the graphics card as it can safely run from a system that only has a 350 Watt PSU; which is going to be a huge benefit to those wishing to upgrade their graphic cards and not have to worry about additional costs of a new power supply. The FireGL cooler fitted was quiet and acoustics were not an issue at all whilst underload throughout the tests. Normally this is a point were one would here some serious noise kicking into play from either the system fans or the GPU cooler. Not so as we stated earlier - nice and quiet. With continuing support for both Direct X 10 and OpenGL 2.1 will mean no reduction upon the CPU performance which is evident from the Cinebench Scores returned.

    In all the years of reviewing professional cards we have not seen such a performance uptake from entry level to mid range. The drivers we have seen and tested; kudos to the some 150 members of the driver team. And what is the next driver release going to be capable of – one will be completely surprised at what it is going to bring. Astounding performance uptakes.



    One of the most interesting points of the new SPECviewperf® 10.0 benchmark is the huge amounts of information it produces. The logs hold bountiful amounts of precise but critical information that show just how the graphics card and complete system I/O performs. It may take considerable amounts of time to complete, though the wait for the true professional is well worth it as we have now seen on the last 2 outings of SPECviewperf® 10.0 in its fullest.

    The performance of the FireGL V5600 has been remarkably astonishing to say the least for a 128 bit controller! Returning results which are found in the competitions High-End professional cards, in some areas their Ultra High-End Cards!
    http://www.3dprofessor.org/Reviews%2...0&C2SBA+P1.htm

  2. #2
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Awesome performance!Especially for a card with 128 bit mem. bus.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    246
    aye, an amaising vertex-pushing card! Beating an Quadro whos worth thousands of $$ lol

    wondering if there's a way to softmod the 2600's to it?
    that'd be an 100$ workstation card monster eh!

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084
    Quote Originally Posted by alayashu View Post
    aye, an amaising vertex-pushing card! Beating an Quadro whos worth thousands of $$ lol

    wondering if there's a way to softmod the 2600's to it?
    that'd be an 100$ workstation card monster eh!
    there is:
    The best thing is its relatively low price and prospect of upgrading Radeons with modded drivers. The V5600 sells for around $600, but as we wrote earlier, it might even be possible to turn an $500 HD2900XT into a FireGL V8600 with modded drivers, more here.
    http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?op...=2861&Itemid=1

  5. #5
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,410

    FireGL mod for Radeon HD 2900XT



    Workstation graphics on the cheap

    A Chinese website has posted a modded version of AMD's drivers that will turn an ATI Radeon HD 2900XT into a FireGL V8600.

    This might not be all that useful to most owners of a Radeon 2900XT, but if you're into OpenGL 3D rendering and need a fast card for the previews, then a Radeon HD 2900XT will be a lot cheaper than a FireGL V8600 card.

    Considering that the FireGL V8600 will set you back US$1899, while you can pick up a 1GB Radeon HD 2900XT for as little as US$499.99, you can save quite a bit of money this way.

    You can download the modded drivers here and it's about a 70MB download >> http://www.newdisk.cn/?wesley8



    http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?op...=2828&Itemid=1


    Last edited by mascaras; 09-05-2007 at 06:36 AM.

    [Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
    [Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! «
    .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
    [Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
    [Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «

  6. #6
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,475
    Any one can confirm this?

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    98
    ya, i would really like to know about that driver thing. i thought that there were hardware tweaks to the workstation cards along with driver tweaks, or at least on the quadros.

    The main reason workstation cards are so expensive is that the company that makes them has to provide very quick and accurate customer support to the user or company using the cards

  8. #8
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quadro cards got some BIOS stuff to help prevent hacks. But in the old days you could do it with a driver too there.

    Not really twin...they do some testing with drivers to validate and then add huge amount to the price. Its simply like 3D software something you milk like a cow.

    What are you gonna do, use something else?
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  9. #9
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,475
    Shintai
    sometimes I think you are day dreaming. What are you talking about?
    Ok tomorrow I'll try to test this drivers on 2900XT 1GB with SPEC

  10. #10
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooper View Post
    Shintai
    sometimes I think you are day dreaming. What are you talking about?
    Ok tomorrow I'll try to test this drivers on 2900XT 1GB with SPEC
    Im talking about desktop>workstation hack.

    Its nothing more than artificial limitations to milk the consumers. Just like SLI etc.

    And as stated with 3D software, there is no alternative. All you can do is bend over and pay.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Where the Cheese Heads Reside
    Posts
    2,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooper View Post
    Shintai
    sometimes I think you are day dreaming. What are you talking about?
    Ok tomorrow I'll try to test this drivers on 2900XT 1GB with SPEC
    That would be sweet. I only have the 512Meg version so surely someone will fix something for it to be reconized. Its gotta do good. If my work laptop with a X1600 Mobile could whoop my X1900XT I had OCed the 2900XT has got to have a great jump in performance.
    -=The Gamer=-
    MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3) | i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz | 1.3875V | 28C Idle / 65C Load (LinX)
    8Gig G.Skill Ripjaw PC3-12800 9-9-9-24 @ 1600Mhz w/ 1.5V | TR Ultra eXtreme 120 w/ 2 Fans
    Sapphire 7950 VaporX 1150/1500 w/ 1.2V/1.5V | 32C Idle / 64C Load | 2x 128Gig Crucial M4 SSD's
    BitFenix Shinobi Window Case | SilverStone DA750 | Dell 2405FPW 24" Screen
    -=The Server=-
    Synology DS1511+ | Dual Core 1.8Ghz CPU | 30C Idle / 38C Load
    3 Gig PC2-6400 | 3x Samsung F4 2TB Raid5 | 2x Samsung F4 2TB
    Heat

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    98
    workstation software (CAD stuff) isn't that hard to get, you can get a student license for cheap. the hardware is my issue, so i was thinking of picking up a 2900xt or 2600xt
    Last edited by Cooper; 09-05-2007 at 02:28 PM.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    You still gonna need a FireGL/Quadro card for HW acceleration I bet.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Where the Cheese Heads Reside
    Posts
    2,173
    Most FireGL conversions from drivers actually unlock all the card has to offer for programs thanks to the way ATI has made them unlockable

    Heck my card unlocked the realtime shading thing in Solidworks (Mobility X1600 card). My boss lost the bet i could make it work lol, boy he was totally scratching his head why I got it to work.

    nVidia on the other hand since the TI series is the last I remember that you could modifiy them easily without a bios flash if it would even work at that.
    -=The Gamer=-
    MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3) | i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz | 1.3875V | 28C Idle / 65C Load (LinX)
    8Gig G.Skill Ripjaw PC3-12800 9-9-9-24 @ 1600Mhz w/ 1.5V | TR Ultra eXtreme 120 w/ 2 Fans
    Sapphire 7950 VaporX 1150/1500 w/ 1.2V/1.5V | 32C Idle / 64C Load | 2x 128Gig Crucial M4 SSD's
    BitFenix Shinobi Window Case | SilverStone DA750 | Dell 2405FPW 24" Screen
    -=The Server=-
    Synology DS1511+ | Dual Core 1.8Ghz CPU | 30C Idle / 38C Load
    3 Gig PC2-6400 | 3x Samsung F4 2TB Raid5 | 2x Samsung F4 2TB
    Heat

  15. #15
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Arlington VA
    Posts
    960
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    You still gonna need a FireGL/Quadro card for HW acceleration I bet.
    We don't use firegls at work so I can't comment on that. However you can run cad programs, or stuff like 3ds max with a generic geforce card if you want. However you're missing a lot of features and it won't be as fast.

    The thing is this is (for the most part) all software based. There are some hardware changes in the cards, but they are just screwing you over with a locked card and drivers.

  16. #16
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,475
    With workstation graphic card customer gets better warranty returns policy, better drivers support, better technical support. This is also included in the premium.

  17. #17
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    nice!
    and some more good news for amd, finally!

  18. #18
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by crash5s View Post
    We don't use firegls at work so I can't comment on that. However you can run cad programs, or stuff like 3ds max with a generic geforce card if you want. However you're missing a lot of features and it won't be as fast.

    The thing is this is (for the most part) all software based. There are some hardware changes in the cards, but they are just screwing you over with a locked card and drivers.
    Comapring here between a Q6600 with say a 8800GTX and a Old Geforce 6/7 quadro card is like day and night in 3dsmax and maya. The quadro based one beats the other by a huge length.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  19. #19
    Team Japan
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Tokyo, Japan
    Posts
    345
    I tried this mod driver with Radeon 2900XT 512MB on P5W-DH + E6600@3.5G.
    I've also checked Quadrized 6800Ultra.

    SPECveiwperf10.0 results...Left: 6800U-Quadro, Right: 2900XT-FireGL

    3dsmax-04: 35.71 / 45.30
    catia-02: 46.78 / 42.35
    ensight-03: 22.56 / 48.89
    maya-02: 86.57 / 209.72
    proe-04: 34.28 / 20.78
    sw-01: 47.25 / 91.75
    tcvis-01: 8.43 / 30.66
    ugnx-01: 10.62 / 27.88

    6800U-Quadro


    2900XT-FireGL


    And SPECapc for Pro/E Wildfire2.0:

    6800U-Quadro


    2900XT-FireGL


    I'm using Pro/E(3D-CAD) for daily work, so I feel a little sad with these results,
    but I think R600 series have potential...
    ...I hope that AMD driver team will make further improvements
    Last edited by kyosen; 09-12-2007 at 04:41 PM. Reason: maintenance for URL of image files

  20. #20
    naokaji
    Guest
    *watches all maya users raid the shops for ati cards*

    looks like its the same situation with performance again as with the dektop drivers...
    very inconsistent speed... in some applications it sucks donkey balls and in others it blows away the competition...

  21. #21
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    761
    It's nice to see ATI's openGL performance improving under AMD. Coupled with Linux drivers that might actually work, it might be enough for me to make the jump, as long as the 2900XT--->FireGL mod works. In the past, radeon--->FGL mods have been easier than GeForce--->Quadro mods, especially since Geforce 7000 onwards, when it seems nVidia has taken extra precautions to prevent both softmods and hardmods. I know of successful mods from FireGL Z1-128 to an X1-128 (basically the workstation equivalent of 9500pro to 9700pro) and Radeon 9800pro---> FGL X3-256T simply by flashing the BIOS between cards, but I haven't seen any mods for PCIe Radeon to FireGL, with the exception of pure driver-based softmods, which do no good to me in Linux...

  22. #22
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,475
    Tested modded drivers on 2900XT 1GB version

    Standart Cats 7.8:


    Modded FireGL drivers:


    SPECviewperf® 10 and 3DMarks coming tomorrow

    BTW are there any other tests for OGL ?
    Last edited by Cooper; 09-06-2007 at 07:14 AM.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    T.O.
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooper View Post
    ..
    BTW are there any other tests for OGL ?
    While not necessarily optimized for FireGL:

    Windows:

    http://www.opengl.org/products/platform/C5/

    Linux:

    http://www.opengl.org/products/platform/C6/

    Mac:

    http://www.opengl.org/products/platform/C7/

    Off the top of my head, GLXGears is a good one that's very standardized across the board.

  24. #24
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Columbia, CT
    Posts
    59
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooper View Post
    Tested modded drivers on 2900XT 1GB version

    Standart Cats 7.8:


    Modded FireGL drivers:


    SPECviewperf® 10 and 3DMarks coming tomorrow

    BTW are there any other tests for OGL ?
    nice benchies!!!! i wonder why your cpu score went down slightly. that shouldn't be affected by the video card at all, if anything it should increase
    Asus Maximus Formula X38 SE
    pentium D830
    COOLER MASTER KHC-L91-U2
    OCZ Gold/Platinum PC6400 3 gig
    soundblaster x-fi XPS
    coolermaster realpower 550
    iStarUSA S-10000BL
    HIS X1950 Pro 512mb

  25. #25
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    T.O.
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by kyosen View Post
    I tried this mod driver with Radeon 2900XT 512MB on P5W-DH + E6600@3.5G.
    I've also checked Quadrized 6800Ultra.

    SPECveiwperf10.0 results...Left: 6800U-Quadro, Right: 2900XT-FireGL

    3dsmax-04: 35.71 / 45.30
    catia-02: 46.78 / 42.35
    ensight-03: 22.56 / 48.89
    maya-02: 86.57 / 209.72
    proe-04: 34.28 / 20.78
    sw-01: 47.25 / 91.75
    tcvis-01: 8.43 / 30.66
    ugnx-01: 10.62 / 27.88

    6800U-Quadro


    2900XT-FireGL


    And SPECapc for Pro/E Wildfire2.0:

    6800U-Quadro


    2900XT-FireGL


    I'm using Pro/E(3D-CAD) for daily work, so I feel a little sad with these results,
    but I think R600 series have potential...
    ...I hope that AMD driver team will make further improvements
    I can't seem to see your pictures. What were the specs of the system running the Quadro? Was the 6800 PCIE or AGP (ie. P5W or other system)? Thanks.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •