Let's say I'm surfing, listening to music, doing a virus scan, and doing a spyware scan. Would the virus scan be on one core, and then the spyware be on another, and then music on one, and the surfing on the last? Just curious.![]()
Let's say I'm surfing, listening to music, doing a virus scan, and doing a spyware scan. Would the virus scan be on one core, and then the spyware be on another, and then music on one, and the surfing on the last? Just curious.![]()
Mmhhmm, yup.
|-------Conner-------|
RIP JimmyMoonDog
2,130,223 F@H Points - My F@H Statistics:
http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/...e=Conman%5F530
Probably yes , but its pointless if all this applications occupies the same hard drive.
Sure, unless any of those applications were multi-threaded, which I'm pretty sure some AV programs are moving towards.
Rig specs
CPU: i7 950 @ 4.2GHz Mobo: eVGA Classified 760 RAM: 3x2GB Corsair DDR3-2,000 Dominator GTs @ 2,000, 8-9-7-24
VGA: Crossfire Sapphire HD6970s SSD: OCZ Vertex 2 60GB HDD: 6x WD6400AAKS in RAID-6 powered by Highpoint RocketRaid 3520
SFX: Auzentech X-Fi Forte w. OP637AU PSU: Corsair HX-1000 Case: Silverstone TJ-09 modded for WC OS: Win7 Pro x64
Liquid-cooled
-=- EK-Supreme HF -=- EK Classified FC -=- 2x MCR120 + MCR320, Scythe Gentle Typhoon 1850s -=-
2x MCP355 w. XSPC Dual-DDC Top -=- EK-Spin bay res -=- 7/16" black Pro-LRT w BP compressions -=- Aquaero w. Powerbooster
Peripherals
-=- 3x Dell U2311H (Eyefinity) -=- Audio Technica ATH-AD1000 -=- Razer Mamba -=- Microsoft "Natural Ergonomic 7000" keyboard -=-
Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism
![]()
YupThe pro about Vista is it's natively multithreaded, so it divvy's up everything equally between all 4 (or two) cores.
Core i3-550 Clarkdale @ 4.2GHz, 1.36v (Corsair A50 HS/F) LinX Stable
MSI H55-GD65 Motherboard
G.Skill 4GBRL DDR3-1600 @ 1755, CL9, 1.55v
Sapphire Radeon 5750 1GB
Samsung F4 320GB - WD Green 1TB
Xigmatek Utgard Case - Corsair VX550
You'll find that windows uses core 0 more than any other cores. Depending on the program and if its not multithreaded the affinity wont automatically set itself to work over all 4 cores. So, if your running all those programs it wont spread evenly over all cores it'll lean more towards core 0 and 1. I've done this several times just to see how it works.
Edit: This is assuming that your using XPThanks Nick I forgot about Vistacrap
![]()
yep and if you want to manually set it
nnstep.com/taskassign.zip
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
There'd be 4 hard drives in RAID 0, which I guess I could have just said yea, one hard drive.![]()
So, XP won't do that?
Not automatically, but thru task manager it does.
|-------Conner-------|
RIP JimmyMoonDog
2,130,223 F@H Points - My F@H Statistics:
http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/...e=Conman%5F530