Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 56

Thread: >> Micron DDR3 / Corsair @ DDR3-1960 CL7-6-5 >> very fast SPi32M runs, 13k Everest <<

  1. 06-26-2007, 03:05 PM #26
    railmeat
    railmeat is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    plan3t 3@rth
    Posts
    987
    amazing...
    Stacker830 Watercooled
    windows7 ultimate 64 bit!!!
    heatkiller(rev3) on 2500k@ 4.5ghz 1.35v,8 gigs 2133 ripjaws 1.5v
    Swiftech Mcp-655,1/2in tygon,13x120 sunnons on junk ps,
    (2)triple 120mm rads,Biostar TP67XE(rev 5.2)
    150 gig velicraptor (stable drive) ssds r still buggy!!
    xfi-xtrememusic,klipsch ultras, sen hd-595s
    Evga Hydro gtX 590,co0lermaster-1250 watt,
    24" Sony fw-900 black ops at @ 2304x1440 85hz/85fps SOLID
    G@m3r 4 L1Fe!!
    http://s76.photobucket.com/albums/j1...0VIEW%20ALL--/
    3dmark 11 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1102387
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-26-2007, 03:12 PM #27
    billdavis
    billdavis is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    1,173
    Send a message via Yahoo to billdavis
    are the corsair DDR3 8500s all micron
    Last edited by billdavis; 06-26-2007 at 03:52 PM.
    1
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 06-26-2007, 03:33 PM #28
    Pedro Rocha
    Pedro Rocha is offline
    Xtreme Old School Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,660
    Great bandwith BA

    You make my old Corsairs 6400C3 feelind a litle depressed

    Can only obtain 12.524 MB/s at DDR900 3-3-3-3 1T



    Last edited by Pedro Rocha; 06-26-2007 at 03:37 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 06-29-2007, 11:26 PM #29
    saaya
    saaya is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by billdavis View Post
    are the corsair DDR3 8500s all micron
    dont think so, there is no micron on the market yet it seems
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 06-30-2007, 06:56 AM #30
    shimmishim
    shimmishim is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    1,674
    Send a message via AIM to shimmishim Send a message via Yahoo to shimmishim
    Great job BA!

    Quite impressed with DDR3 at this early in the game.

    Since I was in AMD world when DDR2 came out, was early DDR2 this good as well? I know that the fatbodies were released relatively early.

    I wonder if it's the same with DDR3. Ah, too much speculating for now I guess.

    Anyway, thanks for showing us the potential of DDR3.

    Now only if DDR3 would come down in price...


    Main Rig:
    CPU Intel i5 2500K @ 4500mhz
    Mobo Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3
    Memory 4x4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600
    Video Cards Sapphire 5850
    PSU Silverstone ST75F Strider 750W
    Hard Drive OCZ Solid 3 60GB | OCZ Vertex 2 60GB | Samsung 103SJ's 4TB
    Cooling Thermalright Ultra 120 | 1 Yate Loon D12SM 120MM
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 06-30-2007, 11:45 AM #31
    Disaster_Master
    Disaster_Master is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    141
    Why do most overclockers want to go back to the old DDR1 like stock voltage

    Nice Results

    To be a professional noob/idiot
    * Default factory speed is for noobs.
    * Everything must go above the speed that the factory consider safe.
    * Everything for more performance
    * Everything fits, and everything can be broken.
    * Most problems can be fixed by adding a volt or two.
    * Post things in your signature that makes no sense at all.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 06-30-2007, 01:58 PM #32
    A101Sugar
    A101Sugar is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    56
    Send a message via AIM to A101Sugar
    Awesome results...

    I wish I had some DDR3 to play with (too bad is soo expensive )
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 06-30-2007, 03:22 PM #33
    luihed
    luihed is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    1,083
    Quote Originally Posted by bachus_anonym View Post
    .Thanks George! Yeah, 13k Read and 10k Copy should be out of reach on curent C2D DDR2 platform, at this CPU speed that is (3920Mhz).
    I think its very possible.... Send me 5x Dominator pc2 8888 and 5x Dominator pc2 6400 c3df and ill give it a try...... Ill return them ... promise hehe...
    E8400 DFI LP P35T2R Ballistix

    8800GTS PCP&C 1.2kw Raptors

    E6600 =5400mhz
    E6700=5680mhz
    QX9650= 6000mhz
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 06-30-2007, 04:36 PM #34
    gandalfone
    gandalfone is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    498
    Nice chip
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 07-01-2007, 05:39 PM #35
    erwinz
    erwinz is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Philippines ^_^
    Posts
    1,618
    Quote Originally Posted by luihed View Post
    I think its very possible.... Send me 5x Dominator pc2 8888 and 5x Dominator pc2 6400 c3df and ill give it a try...... Ill return them ... promise hehe...
    hehehe..
    Asus P5W64 WS Professional , DFI Infinity 965P-S (testing)
    X6800 , E6750 es
    Micron Fatbodies , Micron D9gkx oem, Crucial 8000, Crucial Tracer 8500 (incomming)
    Ati FireGL V5100, Elsa FireGL V3100
    water cooling setup (EK 775 cpu block, swiftech NB Block, Swiftech pump, BI dual pass dual 120mm)
    Silverstone OP650
    raptors, baracuda
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 07-12-2007, 04:50 AM #36
    saaya
    saaya is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    no 3d benches?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 07-13-2007, 11:32 PM #37
    A101Sugar
    A101Sugar is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    56
    Send a message via AIM to A101Sugar
    I know you want to send me a kit
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 07-23-2007, 06:13 PM #38
    Timbosan
    Timbosan is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    590
    There's some nice DDR3 results Why would you think 13k read bandwidth is out of reach? I have some DDR2 with read bandwidth over 14000 MB/s.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version.  Name: Everest Read - 3.4GHz @ 1.37v DDR 972 4-4-4-8 @ 2.24v_1.jpg  Views: 274  Size: 189.3 KB  ID: 62068  
    Last edited by Timbosan; 07-23-2007 at 06:16 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 07-23-2007, 08:28 PM #39
    eva2000
    eva2000 is offline
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    Must be a bugged run.. try Everest Ultimate 4.0.1033 beta version instead
    ---
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 07-23-2007, 09:27 PM #40
    Timbosan
    Timbosan is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    590
    Quote Originally Posted by eva2000 View Post
    Must be a bugged run.. try Everest Ultimate 4.0.1033 beta version instead
    I have the full version, why would it be bugged, and why would the beta be better? (I would have thought full version would be better than the beta)

    Anyway got a link to it i cant find it? Im more than happy to install & bench again. Alternatively send it to

    timbosan@gmail.com

    thanks
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 07-23-2007, 09:57 PM #41
    dinos22
    dinos22 is offline
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    you should always compare with same software if you can particularly with synthetic benchmarks like this
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 07-23-2007, 09:58 PM #42
    Pyr0
    Pyr0 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    U.K.
    Posts
    1,171
    Send a message via Skype™ to Pyr0
    EVEREST Ultimate Edition Beta Build 1076 seems to be the latest one
    Lavalys Discussion Forum > Lavalys EVEREST > Beta versions
    i950 (3035B684)
    Gigabyte EX58A-UD3R
    3x4GB G.Skill PC3-12800 7-8-7-24
    HIS Radeon HD 6970 2GB & Dell 3007WFP-HC
    Asus Xonar DX
    128GB C300, Velociraptor & Sammy F3's
    Corsair AX850W
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 07-23-2007, 10:03 PM #43
    eva2000
    eva2000 is offline
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    try these 2 http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/...-Edition.shtml

    edit thanks Pyr0 for the link
    ---
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 07-23-2007, 10:14 PM #44
    Timbosan
    Timbosan is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    590
    im at work so i cant check right now, but im using one of those latest versions, as it correctly detects my P965 chipset etc. its not a beta version though. its been consistent though, before i got my new ram i was still pulling over 12k read bandwidth.

    Here's is my write, copy & latency Everest benches at same settings as the above read bench. Compared to others i have seen they look fine, if not low. I have seen other DDR2 pulling 14K+ read BW too.

    EDIT: i removed pics didnt wanna hijack the thread.
    Last edited by Timbosan; 07-24-2007 at 01:24 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 07-23-2007, 10:43 PM #45
    STEvil
    STEvil is offline
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    Send a message via ICQ to STEvil Send a message via MSN to STEvil
    Always need to use the same version, otherwise you may as well be comparring Aquamark to 3DMark2003.

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  21. 07-23-2007, 11:19 PM #46
    saaya
    saaya is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    14k with 1000 444?
    you think you score the same as other people or less?
    well show me some more of those 14k results :P
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  22. 07-24-2007, 01:34 AM #47
    Timbosan
    Timbosan is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    590
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    14k with 1000 444?
    you think you score the same as other people or less?
    well show me some more of those 14k results :P
    Here's a quote from an Asus Striker review:

    "Everest measured a bit over 14,000 MB/s at Memory Read test, compare it to the 7764 MB/s it measured with default"

    found here: http://it-review.net/index.php?optio...&limitstart=10

    and this: Just read an artical at tomshardware and they oc"d an e6300 to 1940 fsb to get 3.4ghz and they"re Everest bench was over 14000.

    found here: http://evga.com/forums/tm.asp?m=56159 (i cant find the Toms Hardware review atm)

    Ive read others i will add them here if i find em again.
    Last edited by Timbosan; 07-24-2007 at 02:00 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  23. 07-24-2007, 02:47 AM #48
    saaya
    saaya is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    that striker review is 7 months old...
    you are using everest ultimate 2006

    still kinda weird that newer versions of everest score lower than this old one... weird... maybe it was a bug in the old version?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  24. 07-24-2007, 03:22 AM #49
    Timbosan
    Timbosan is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    590
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    you are using everest ultimate 2006

    still kinda weird that newer versions of everest score lower than this old one... weird... maybe it was a bug in the old version?
    There is no way my ram would come close to the DDR3. Either the newer versions are scoring too low, or the older (2006) version is scoring too high.
    Last edited by Timbosan; 07-24-2007 at 03:27 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  25. 07-24-2007, 03:24 AM #50
    saaya
    saaya is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    well ddr2 CAN get close to these DDR3 scores but what you need is 1000+ 333 or 1300+ 444 i think
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules