To each their own....
I started on Canon 300D, 350D and a 20D with a variety of lenses (some L). None were mine but I had full 24/7 access (and use priority over everyone else who had access
) and I've got to say the K10D is a lot more appealing than any of the Canons were (and I've since briefly used a 400D).
Frankly, I've gotten a little tired of the too-clean look from Canon. And the photographic-control-end of them is very bland....limiting exposure modes (well, in all fairness...they're equal to Nikon), archaic Auto ISO.... No SR without super expensive lenses, newer 400D is uncomfortable for my hands (have to grip with my fingertips because the grip is apparently made for tiny hands).
Don't get me wrong, it takes very, very good pictures without much effort....but compared to the K10D and even the Nikons, it's less fun to use and doesn't have any uniqueness from a feature or output point-of-view.
The shooting modes are more flexible on the K10D for people who are familiar with aperture/exposure/ISO/shutter/etc (i.e., people who prefer to not use scene or Auto modes and can properly expose a photo on their own)...the sensor is the same one from D200 but with only a uni-directional AA filter (meaning higher resolution in exchange for an occasional demosaicing artifact...in RAW if competes with the 40D for detail)...it has in-body SR (no need to have it in-lens [which is very expensive]) and compatibility with every k-mount lens made (yes, SR works on every k-mount lens made...
)....it's a heavy, solid camera with weather-proofing seals....great viewfinder....and with firmware 1.20 and 1.30, it has hard-buttons for adjusting everything you'd need. Compared to other ~$700 cameras, it's a lot more bang for the buck. It's not the be-all and end-all of cameras...it's not great for sports or BIF or super low-light, but for a personal camera, it's wonderful, fun to use, intuitive, has amazing image quality in RAW (and film-like in default JPEG mode, which I don't personally find useful) and not to be shrugged off as easily as many Canikon users do.
I personally hate SD(HC) cards, broken too many just in casual use...probably one of my readers being slightly too small and stressing the casing (which falls apart...never had any other problems other than the casing comes apart). So that definitely is a drawback of the K10D for me...probably because I also started on CF MicroDrives which are built like tanks.
Here's my selections for various DSLR niches (btw...I don't shoot JPEG at all)
Starting photography (but want DSLR results/something to build on):
Buy into whatever system you feel you'll use in the end. 3x0D, D40(x), K100D, E410, etc. The basic line, just to make sure you like what you're doing. Get a feel for each one before you buy...some don't 'feel' right even without use.
Small-body DSLR: Oly's...they sacrifice a bit with the 4/3rds system, but the small bodies are really cool and handle very, very well for their size.
Personal (experienced) use: K10D...even more so than a D80/D200 or 400D/40D. Such a vast catalog of lenses at full disposal...great sensor and SR (though the SR isn't as good as some ultra-expensive lens' in-lens SR...but hey, it works with lenses made in the 70s and modern ones just as well, sure-as-poop better than nothing, worth a stop or 2 usually), awesome shooting modes, great viewfinder. No reason to spend more unless you need higher FPS or faster AF (at which point, you're at bodies that are double the cost anyway...see "business" category).
Personal (somewhat inexperienced): 40D/400D most likely...very forgiving cameras with clean image quality. Definitely the 'it' choice...but very conservative in features. Almost the point-and-shoots of the DSLRs... For those wanting to learn a little bit about photography (not hard at all...), K10D...more to grow into and enjoy
Business (not sure what to call this...): if you're good at photography, and have a need for higher FPS or getting moving targets, the D300. D300 is an amazing new camera really...but it's also expensive and if you don't need the extra advantages, no need to spend the extra money.
BIF: Nikon D300 or D3...AF is just awesome on them, go by price and needs (D3 better for dawn/dusk birds, or elusive high-speed dives of course). Not sure how the 1-D mkIII's AF system fares with BIF :-/
Sports: Nikon D3 or Canon 1-D mkIII....depends on which system you're invested in I suppose. D3 is better for basketball and volleyball (low-light, indoors stuff where ultra-high ISO is useful), 1D mkIII has slightly higher FPS and that could be useful as well. Image quality and AF on both are very, very good...but the D3's main selling point is a massive sensor with only 12MP.
Studio portraits: Canon 1-Ds mkIII...21MP, great tethered support, need I say more?
Landscape: Canon 1-Ds mkIII....21MP. Might be at Hasselblad territory by now though....
Bookmarks