One week to go, looking forward to shaking your handOriginally Posted by Sampsa
Great scores Kinc! Looking forward for next weekend
I wont' start new thread for this, but just started my own Radeon HD 2900 XT CrossFire benches with QX6850 and Asus Blitz Formula. CPU with dryice cooling and graphic cards with stock cooling, 3DMark06 23677. Managed to overtake Fugger and gprhellas:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=3179247
//Andreas
You can never get to much CPU perf. I want moreWow!!!
Not bad start Kinc!!!
Incredible scores!!!
You're not CPU limited!!
Congratz!
exactly!You can never get to much CPU perf. I want more
HeheYou can never get to much CPU perf. I want more
For me it will be ok
Have you tried 3d'01 and Aquamark?
I'm curious to see the results
Battlefield 3: Nachthymnen666
I wont be posting anymore for a while now but I see that I forgot to post the Aquamark score here. Done with 2900XT Crossfire.Hehe
For me it will be ok
Have you tried 3d'01 and Aquamark?
I'm curious to see the results
wow congrats Kinc 301k
---
Over 300!!
Great
was it 2 or 4 core??
Frequency??
voltage??
Last edited by gandalfone; 09-29-2007 at 05:56 AM.
Really nice AM3!!
Uh!!!
301K!!!
Not bad!!!
Battlefield 3: Nachthymnen666
2 cores. 5400MHz. 1.82V.Over 300!!
Great
was it 2 or 4 core??
Frequency??
voltage??
No 3dmark01?
Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.
Would really love to see the 01. That AM3 score is Insane!!! Congrats on breaking 300K!
Congrats Kinc...IMPRESSIVE score with 2900XT
Galaxy 1KW--i7 920--Gigabyte EX58-UD5--Elixir 1400mhz cas8 12Gb--9800 GX2--X-Fi Titanium Champion Series--Velociraptor 300Gb+1,5Tb Seagate All Cooled by YBRIS
Have to wait until the release of the chip for more results.Would really love to see the 01. That AM3 score is Insane!!! Congrats on breaking 300K!
Kinc, the '06 cpu score it's not a little bit "low"?
It's for the low FSB?
Last edited by nachthymnen; 09-30-2007 at 01:32 AM.
Battlefield 3: Nachthymnen666
Because it is with ATI cards. With NV that would have been close to 8700.Kinc, the '06 cpu score it's not a little bit "low"?
It's for the low FSB?
ok marcus since you can't publish result, you can still hint us
how many digits for 01?
Uh, I didn't know this
Tks for your explanation
Battlefield 3: Nachthymnen666
It's kinda strange you think there should be no differnce since it is a cpu-test. The extra perf for NV came with 158.22 if I remeber correctly. The driver wich removed alot of cpu overhead for NV.Uh, I didn't know this
Tks for your explanation
Reckon it'd be a nice gesture to remove the scores from the orb for the time being as some people are still benching the "old stuff" hard.(No, I don't mean myself)
Nice find Marcus! Interesting... choice of card affects CPU score. Not just a CPU score after all.
Just ignore it if you are running 65nm. The reason for these 3dmark scores to be published at this point at all is just to fill in some gaps on what this cpu can do in 3DMark. I myself were running QX6850 just last night on Striker Extreme for some Ultra SLI in 01 and 03. Will continue today. I had completly forgot what a pain in the ass 680i can beReckon it'd be a nice gesture to remove the scores from the orb for the time being as some people are still benching the "old stuff" hard.
I myself were running QX6850 just last night on Striker Extreme for some Ultra SLI in 01 and 03. Will continue today. I had completly forgot what a pain in the ass 680i can be
INTEL PWA FOR EVER
Dr. Who my arss...
.........
Small improvement, 24283 points and spot #10 in 3DMark06 Hall of Fame:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=3267528
Favourite game: 3DMark
Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri
That's always the caseReckon it'd be a nice gesture to remove the scores from the orb for the time being as some people are still benching the "old stuff" hard.
Don't see why the scores should be removed that are absolutely great
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks