Matbe, a french/belgian site, tested 105 PSU in a big review:
http://www.matbe.com/articles/lire/3...alimentations/
(french)
Matbe, a french/belgian site, tested 105 PSU in a big review:
http://www.matbe.com/articles/lire/3...alimentations/
(french)
Very nice.
Use the google translator, or something of the sort, to get the gist of the review.
Just spectacular.
ONE HUNDRED FIVE friggin PSUs and not a single PCPnC.
naked X2 3800+ Toledo LCBIE 0618EPMW ]3020mhz@1.554v]
TT BigTyphoon
DFI LP UT NF4 Sli-D - 4/06 BT mod
PCP&C Silencer 750w
2x1GB Mushkin XP4000 Samsung C-UCCC @253mhz 3,4,3,8 1T @ 2.65v
eVGA 8800GT 512MB@ 787/1944/2244
I thought this was for a 105w PSU at first..
Current Setup:
-9850 GX2's in Quad SLI config
-Asus P5N32-SLI MB
-2x512mb of PC2-5300 DDR2
-Intel Celeron D OC'd to 3.2Ghz
-Windows Me with XP theme
-WD Caviar 20GB Hard Drive
-Zip drive
-Jazz drive
-3.5" floppy drive
-5.25" floppy drive
http://translate.google.com/translat...language_tools
Translation of conclusion
Work and School, Work and School, oi!
Seasonic dominates...
*hugs his M12 600W*
You were not supposed to see this.
Well not exactly I live in Greece and one of the bigger vendor here sells those PSUs here is the link http://www.plaisio.gr/productlist.as...1&category=916 .
Not exactly cheap at 489 Euros for the 1000Watt version considering that they also sell the Enermax Galaxy 1000watt (the new one) and the Silverstone Olympia 1000watt for 299 Euros. Also they have the OCZ 1000watt for 279 Euros so for me the PC PnC is simply not worth it.
pc pnc are not in french shop, but it s easy to order on their website
i already buy 2 1kw psu, and i ve just ordered a 750w this week
psu shipped the same day i order it, and get it 6 days after ...
1. Bi-xeon 2* 3.8Ghz 2Mo FSB 800 dn800-sli 2* 6800 U 4* 1Go ddr2 ecc reg - 2 raptor 74 + 3* maxtor 250Go pcp 750w
2. qx6850 + xfx nf780i + 4gb geil pc8500 - 8800gtx - pcp 1kw - 3 x i-ram raid0 12 gb - 6 raptor 150 + stacker 832 dell 24"
3. k8qw + m4881+ 8 opty 875 + 7800gtx 512 + 8 gb ddr ecc + 2x1kw psu +
4. bi opteron 2218 + tyan s2915 + 8gb ddr ecc + 5tb storage
×3. *strokes S-12 600*
Even though PCPnC is not there, we already know how it would score: excellent
power and voltages, high noise, high price. Therefore it wouldn't make the top/
ultimate list.
We could also add Chieftec and some other PSUs to the "missing" list, but then
it would also be 150+ psus and even more work for the testers. At least we saw
a good bunch compared, including some off brands, and got some interesting
information.
Usual suspects: i5-750 & H212+ | Biostar T5XE CFX-SLI | 4GB RAndoM | 4850 + AC S1 + 120@5V + modded stock for VRAM/VRM | Seasonic S12-600 | 7200.12 | P180 | U2311H & S2253BW | MX518
mITX media & to-be-server machine: A330ION | Seasonic SFX | WD600BEVS boot & WD15EARS data
Laptops: Lifebook T4215 tablet, Vaio TX3XP
Bike: ZX6R
1. Bi-xeon 2* 3.8Ghz 2Mo FSB 800 dn800-sli 2* 6800 U 4* 1Go ddr2 ecc reg - 2 raptor 74 + 3* maxtor 250Go pcp 750w
2. qx6850 + xfx nf780i + 4gb geil pc8500 - 8800gtx - pcp 1kw - 3 x i-ram raid0 12 gb - 6 raptor 150 + stacker 832 dell 24"
3. k8qw + m4881+ 8 opty 875 + 7800gtx 512 + 8 gb ddr ecc + 2x1kw psu +
4. bi opteron 2218 + tyan s2915 + 8gb ddr ecc + 5tb storage
naked X2 3800+ Toledo LCBIE 0618EPMW ]3020mhz@1.554v]
TT BigTyphoon
DFI LP UT NF4 Sli-D - 4/06 BT mod
PCP&C Silencer 750w
2x1GB Mushkin XP4000 Samsung C-UCCC @253mhz 3,4,3,8 1T @ 2.65v
eVGA 8800GT 512MB@ 787/1944/2244
^Yup PCP&C orders them from the same oem AFIAK. Or maybe seasonic is the oem. either way, they are still terrific PSU's.
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
English Version (translated) - for some reason it doesn't work with direct link, you'll have to use Google Translator and add it manually.
You have http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/tr as an alternative for translation.
Importance of the +12 volts
Useless multiple rails because... of INTELThese last years saw the progressive reduction in L’importance of the tensions +3.3 volts and +5 volts with an increasingly frequent recourse to the +12 volts. The processor and the graphics boards for example need only the +12 volts. For the processor, that materializes by connector ATX +12 volts with 4 pins tandis another connector EPS with 8 pins, always delivering 12 volts, also made its appearance on a number growing of mother charts. The graphics boards on their side started by needing a connector FDD before passing to the Molex connector then to the PCI-Express train to 6 pines before arrived recent of the connectors at 8 pins, always delivering 12 volts. All this has as a consequence that the intensities of the lines +5 volts and the +3.3 volts tend to lose in importance with the profit of the +12 volts. is the reason for which during our tests, we give only the value of tension of the +12 volts. Obviously we measure the values of the +5 and +3.3 volts but generally, these tensions are used little and not very affected.
All this brings us to the question of the multiple rails +12 volts. So initially, we believed qu’there was a real interest with this division of the line +12 volts, we must retrogress and to better clarify the genesis of this "fashion". INTEL which always puts its nose everywhere and which takes part in the definition of standards ATX for the food believed good D’one day to recommend, because it acts only one recommendation, which the food could not have supporting of lines +12 volts more than 20 amps, for reasons of safety. In short, if a line +12 volts undergoes a load higher than 20 amps, that is to say 240 Watts, a setting in protection must intervene. From there the fashion left the multiple rails +12 volts with quasi a generalization of the presence at least two rails when this is not 3, 4 and even 6 on the last Cooler Master of 850 Watts and very last Tagan U96 of 900 and 1100 Watts. Even do not make amalgams: this is not parce a block flopée one of rails +12 volts qu’it will be better, nor more stable. On the food of strong power, is quasi an obligation "marketing" if one wants to follow the standard recommended by INTEL. So really one wants a limitation with 20 amps per line, how to make to deliver more than 75 amps out of the +12 volts via 2 or 3 rails. It is then necessary imperatively to pass to 4 rails minimum.
3 starting points for the +12 volts... from only one and even single line upstream
Actually, these rails +12 volts are virtual on 99.99 % of the food of the market. Because it does not act of real rails +12 separate volts but of rails derived from the principal line +12 volts, upstream. Here, the methods of separation vary a manufacturer with different. Some play the game by properly separating the +12 volts in various lines, each one with a control of intensity which must provide. This means that if one of the rails +12 volts undergoes at a time given a load higher than 20 amps, food will be put in protection. C’is quite beautiful to respect recommendation INTEL but in certain cases, that can prove awkward. Indeed, the configurations overclockérs and containing powerful graphics boards in SLI or Crossfire will quickly have made reach a need for 20 amps and will regularly exceed it at the time of very strong requests. In similar case, you find yourselves with a phase supply with recommendations INTEL but being able to limit you in certain extreme uses.
Different manufacturers make only splitter the +12 volts without implementing protection there. That thus means that if your configuration at a given time needs on a rail +12 volts more than 20 amps, L’food will not be cut. In similar case, there is a physical separation well on the PCB but in practice, C’is as if you lay out D’single +12 volts able to support an important intensity resulting D’a kind of combination from the various separate lines. In short, one separates to return to final to a reunification. Who said absurd?
6 rails +12 volts, beaten record! Who says better?
.....................................Any nonsense of this standard goes sometimes sure to whimsical specifications as for example Seasonic which announces the same intensity of 18 amps per rail +12 volts on all these blocks S12 Energy + and M12 with however of the maximum powers going from 500 to 700 Watts. What changes a model with different is maximum intensity supported by the combination of these four rails +12 volts, proving since the limitation of 20 amps N’is not respected. as much more than Seasonic announces 4 rails qu then actually, it has there that two present on the PCB and moreover, it acts only one Split without protection no, both derived ne only and single line +12 volts upstream. To continue in nonsense of these recommendations, given up by INTEL since, we also saw passing from the blocks announcing on a rail +12 volts 15 amps and on the second 30 amps whereas standard INTEL recommended maximum 20 amps. In short, the multiplication of the rails +12 volts is a heresy marketing bus inevitably S’there is more, is that inevitably, is better. is unfortunately false you L’will have included/understood, without counting that the creation of these useless rails on the PCB has a cost of design, development and manufacture. One says thank you who? Thank you Mr. INTEL…
In spite of that, you are not ready to see the manufacturers returning to food monorail because that would sound badly in terms of marketing. Sure here, only Silverstone had courage to return on certain from these models to single a large rail +12 volts with a general protection, while asserting it. Let us hope that the remainder of the pack follows the movement in order to return to more simplicity, of clearness and transparency for the consumers…
Last edited by XSAlliN; 04-29-2007 at 11:27 PM.
The only brand PSU that I've ever purchased other than PC P&C (except a Cooler Master that came in a case and didn't see much use) was one Enermax EG701AX-VE SFMA. The only PSU that I've ever had fail was that Enermax. The PSU was still under warranty and Enermax was extremely helpful and replaced it. No complaints at all about their customer service from me. However, I've purchased 2 power supplies since that failure and neither of them were Enermax brand.....
Bookmarks