Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: JPEG setting to maximize quality/minimize size

  1. #1
    Muslim Overclocker
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,786

    JPEG setting to maximize quality/minimize size

    Basic ACDSee window. That slider has a big impact on quality obviously, but what is the best setting for all the options?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	untitled.JPG 
Views:	357 
Size:	31.8 KB 
ID:	57482  

    My watercooling experience

    Water
    Scythe Gentle Typhoons 120mm 1850RPM
    Thermochill PA120.3 Radiator
    Enzotech Sapphire Rev.A CPU Block
    Laing DDC 3.2
    XSPC Dual Pump Reservoir
    Primochill Pro LRT Red 1/2"
    Bitspower fittings + water temp sensor

    Rig
    E8400 | 4GB HyperX PC8500 | Corsair HX620W | ATI HD4870 512MB


    I see what I see, and you see what you see. I can't make you see what I see, but I can tell you what I see is not what you see. Truth is, we see what we want to see, and what we want to see is what those around us see. And what we don't see is... well, conspiracies.



  2. #2
    Xtreme X.I.P. Soulburner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    8,868
    I'm glad this came up.

    I work in Photoshop and usually save with a quality of 10 and "Progressive" as any higher greatly increases file size and does not offer any difference unless you studied them up close, flipping them back to back.

    That is what I have found works best for me. I'd like to know what the "ideal" is.
    System
    ASUS Z170-Pro
    Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
    MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
    32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
    Samsung 850 EVO (2)
    EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
    Corsair Hydro H90
    NZXT S340

  3. #3
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    For online publishing, I use "73" via Photoshop's "save for web" (no preview thumbnail [smaller size], higher control of final saved image w/o changing the original). It has EXACT filesize estimation....also has full GIF and PNG control

    For sharing with family or for archiving, I keep it at around 90.

    The first is equivalent to a "9" in Photoshop's 1-12 scale, the latter I use "11."

    "Progressive" is for online purposes....essentially allows the image to be rendered progressively if it's slowly loaded. This is for dialup connections mainly....only changes the data pattern (though is typically a larger file).

  4. #4
    Xtreme X.I.P. Soulburner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    8,868
    I have compared the file size difference in Progressive and it is trivial.

    Using "Save for Web" kills all the EXIF data, so that isn't an option for a lot of people like me.
    System
    ASUS Z170-Pro
    Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
    MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
    32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
    Samsung 850 EVO (2)
    EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
    Corsair Hydro H90
    NZXT S340

  5. #5
    Muslim Overclocker
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,786
    I am learning.

    So why would I care about EXIF data?

    My watercooling experience

    Water
    Scythe Gentle Typhoons 120mm 1850RPM
    Thermochill PA120.3 Radiator
    Enzotech Sapphire Rev.A CPU Block
    Laing DDC 3.2
    XSPC Dual Pump Reservoir
    Primochill Pro LRT Red 1/2"
    Bitspower fittings + water temp sensor

    Rig
    E8400 | 4GB HyperX PC8500 | Corsair HX620W | ATI HD4870 512MB


    I see what I see, and you see what you see. I can't make you see what I see, but I can tell you what I see is not what you see. Truth is, we see what we want to see, and what we want to see is what those around us see. And what we don't see is... well, conspiracies.



  6. #6
    Xtreme X.I.P. Soulburner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    8,868
    http://www.digicamhelp.com/learn/glossary/exif.php

    http://www.digital-photo-secrets.com.../what-is-exif/

    You can view EXIF data for a photo in Photoshop, or in the Opera browser by right clicking a picture. Its very useful.
    System
    ASUS Z170-Pro
    Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
    MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
    32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
    Samsung 850 EVO (2)
    EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
    Corsair Hydro H90
    NZXT S340

  7. #7
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    actually what I prefer is to use the preview option and reduce the settings until the point where it doesn't look like I want it to
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,060
    I shoot in RAW and save anything I do as high quality ass possible

    CPU Z:2700 2k1:27952 2k3:12282 2k5:5763 PCM05 AQ3
    Opteron 165 s939_____OCZ RAM/PSU_____BBATI X800xl

  9. #9
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnj View Post
    I shoot in RAW
    Ditto....but for more reasons than just JPEG compression (as I'm sure you do).
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnj
    ...and save anything I do as high quality ass possible
    This I actually don't do. I only save exactly what I plan to publish as I plan to publish it and in a separate folder. I keep the RAWs and the accompanying .xmp files and just reprocess the photo if I ever need to reuse it later and the existing file won't work.

    Regarding EXIF....never found a use for it so I just ditch it Just takes up extra bits for me....my file system already has dates built in and the camera settings are of no import to me (I only occasionally care about ISO, but I can tell which setting I used just by looking at the image [for my cameras]).

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,060
    Right. I save the original DNG files in a dated folder, make a sub folder for modified photo's and save anything I plan to publish in there. Sometimes I end up with 2 copies of a file in the sub folder because of my work flow though.

    CPU Z:2700 2k1:27952 2k3:12282 2k5:5763 PCM05 AQ3
    Opteron 165 s939_____OCZ RAM/PSU_____BBATI X800xl

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    -X-
    Posts
    165
    I usually use quality at 93% and disable the 2:1 option for maximum quality

    as my new avatar of my cat taken a few days ago shows

    <---

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    457
    I generally use 10 baseline optimized in photoshop, it seems to give good results.

    Also you can get an exif viewer plugin for firefox here.
    Last edited by Butcher_; 05-10-2007 at 12:45 PM.
    CPU Temps: Forget MBM, if it don't crash it ain't too hot.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •