You simply don't get all credit, that's it. Even my own compiled versions on linux that score higher don't get full credit. Just overclock and use as many cores as you canOriginally Posted by ANP !!!
ohh,, i m extremely SORRY .. lol.
I seriously didnt knew it was cheating to use those files..
U can delete my posts.
...
Today...e6600 @3.55Ghz
XSWCG Disclaimer:
We are not responsible for the large sums of money that you WILL want to spend to upgrade and add additional equipment. This is an addiction and the forum takes no responsibility morally or financially for the equipment and therapy cost. Thank you and have a great day.
Sigmund Freud said... "Failure to CRUNCH is a sign of Sexual Inadequacies".
This is what it shows:
5/24/2007 9:22:14 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
5/24/2007 9:22:15 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/24/2007 9:23:16 AM||Benchmark results:
5/24/2007 9:23:16 AM|| Number of CPUs: 8
5/24/2007 9:23:16 AM|| 1277 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/24/2007 9:23:16 AM|| 851 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/24/2007 9:23:17 AM||Resuming computation
That is w/ hyperthreading enabled. Should I disable it?
8*1277= 10,216 Whetstone
8*851= 6,808 Dhrystone
This is no HT:
5/24/2007 9:34:43 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
5/24/2007 9:34:43 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/24/2007 9:35:44 AM||Benchmark results:
5/24/2007 9:35:44 AM|| Number of CPUs: 4
5/24/2007 9:35:44 AM|| 1500 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/24/2007 9:35:44 AM|| 2429 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/24/2007 9:35:45 AM||Resuming computation
4*1500= 6000 Whetstone
4*2429= 9716 Dhrystone
??? Which is better?
Last edited by Nightcreeper; 05-24-2007 at 06:39 AM.
Bench with HT off, then run with HT on
Main rig:
CPU: I7 920C0 @ 3.6Ghz (180*20)
Mobo: DFI UT X58 T3eH8
RAM: 12GB OCZ DDR3-1600 Platinum
GPU/LCD: GeForce GTX280 + GeForce 8600GTS (Quad LCDs)
Intel X25-M G2 80GB, 12TB storage
PSU/Case: Corsair AX850, Silverstone TJ07
Massive update!!
Main rig:
CPU: I7 920C0 @ 3.6Ghz (180*20)
Mobo: DFI UT X58 T3eH8
RAM: 12GB OCZ DDR3-1600 Platinum
GPU/LCD: GeForce GTX280 + GeForce 8600GTS (Quad LCDs)
Intel X25-M G2 80GB, 12TB storage
PSU/Case: Corsair AX850, Silverstone TJ07
Celeron 420 (Conroe-L) @ 2.8GHz, Asrock 1333 R1.0
2750/6300
Who would think it
Last edited by kiwi; 06-20-2007 at 11:51 AM.
...
New version BOINC bench results...
Benches on EVGA 680i, QX6700@3.2g, 2gig ram. Three runs each
V5.8.16 (old)
3000/6208, 2998/6266, 3000/6259
V5.10.7 (new)
3143/7220, 3143/7198, 3145/7221
The new stuff benches higher....
6/20/2007 1:40:28 PM|| 3632 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/20/2007 1:40:28 PM|| 7501 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
E6400 @ 3.7 at this moment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I seem to be getting the same numbers on OS X with the new one...though I'm also encoding a movie at the exact same time, so that may be interfering a little
Still higher than XP too
EDIT:
QX6700 @ 318x11 (3.5GHz), XBX2, 2x2GB 318 6-4-4-18, OS X
2835/8484, 2834/8484, 2836/8485
Definite increase once I turned off the encoding.
I didn't know there was a new BOINC release out . Is this a beta version ? (ending on an odd number , or what's the rule again , Sierra ?)
nice bench scores
EDIT : there's a new thread about BOINC 5.10.7 already, i see now
Last edited by Jaco; 06-20-2007 at 01:23 PM.
Interesting. 5% flops, 15% iops. Will result in about 11% claim increase (not necessary granted though).
Edit: I think I have a hunch about why this happened.
Last edited by meshmesh; 06-21-2007 at 02:49 AM.
Dual Clovertown @ 3.2 GHz (stock Vcore), 4x1GB 667 FB-DIMMS, SM X7DAE, Silencer 610 PSU, Windows server 2K3 EE.
(professionally built & generously hosted by movieman)
AMD64 X2 4400+ @237x11 (1.39v), Corsair TwinX2048-3500LL @2.5-3-2-6-1T (2.75V), MSI K8N Neo4, Tagan 420W PSU, Windows XP Pro SP2.
How's this for a change?
Using Boinc ver 5.8.16
6/21/2007 5:40:25 AM||Benchmark results:
6/21/2007 5:40:25 AM|| Number of CPUs: 4
6/21/2007 5:40:25 AM|| 1597 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/21/2007 5:40:25 AM|| 1694 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Using Bionc ver 5.10.7
6/21/2007 6:45:38 AM||Benchmark results:
6/21/2007 6:45:38 AM|| Number of CPUs: 4
6/21/2007 6:45:38 AM|| 1639 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/21/2007 6:45:38 AM|| 3004 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
-------------------------------------------------------------------
6/21/2007 6:47:53 AM||Benchmark results:
6/21/2007 6:47:53 AM|| Number of CPUs: 4
6/21/2007 6:47:53 AM|| 1635 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/21/2007 6:47:53 AM|| 3037 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
---------------------------------------------------------------------
First one was the best of 3 benches with 5.8.16..BIG improvement!
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
You are not serious! have you been running it like that for long?How's this for a change?
Using Boinc ver 5.8.16
6/21/2007 5:40:25 AM||Benchmark results:
6/21/2007 5:40:25 AM|| Number of CPUs: 4
6/21/2007 5:40:25 AM|| 1597 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/21/2007 5:40:25 AM|| 1694 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Using Bionc ver 5.10.7
6/21/2007 6:45:38 AM||Benchmark results:
6/21/2007 6:45:38 AM|| Number of CPUs: 4
6/21/2007 6:45:38 AM|| 1639 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/21/2007 6:45:38 AM|| 3004 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
-------------------------------------------------------------------
6/21/2007 6:47:53 AM||Benchmark results:
6/21/2007 6:47:53 AM|| Number of CPUs: 4
6/21/2007 6:47:53 AM|| 1635 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/21/2007 6:47:53 AM|| 3037 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
---------------------------------------------------------------------
First one was the best of 3 benches with 5.8.16..BIG improvement!
That was a bad bench MM, not a 100% improvement.
Is this the older Xeons?
Dual Clovertown @ 3.2 GHz (stock Vcore), 4x1GB 667 FB-DIMMS, SM X7DAE, Silencer 610 PSU, Windows server 2K3 EE.
(professionally built & generously hosted by movieman)
AMD64 X2 4400+ @237x11 (1.39v), Corsair TwinX2048-3500LL @2.5-3-2-6-1T (2.75V), MSI K8N Neo4, Tagan 420W PSU, Windows XP Pro SP2.
This is the old netburst xeons and yes, thats all you could get from them.You are not serious! have you been running it like that for long?
That was a bad bench MM, not a 100% improvement.
Is this the older Xeons?
Not any more!Changing the DX2400 in a minute and I am wondering about the clovers..
Talk to me my friend.
I'll do mine first and then let you know what I see.
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
Ok. One thing though:This is the old netburst xeons and yes, thats all you could get from them.
Not any more!
Talk to me my friend.
I'll do mine first and then let you know what I see.
The new Grid "features" eats some considerable cpu cycles. So definitly install as service and don't leave the boinc manager open after checking.
Dual Clovertown @ 3.2 GHz (stock Vcore), 4x1GB 667 FB-DIMMS, SM X7DAE, Silencer 610 PSU, Windows server 2K3 EE.
(professionally built & generously hosted by movieman)
AMD64 X2 4400+ @237x11 (1.39v), Corsair TwinX2048-3500LL @2.5-3-2-6-1T (2.75V), MSI K8N Neo4, Tagan 420W PSU, Windows XP Pro SP2.
Understood and this is what I saw after installing on the "slow" clover:
With Boinc 5.8.16 at 2667mhz:
6/21/2007 7:10:27 AM||Benchmark results:
6/21/2007 7:10:27 AM|| Number of CPUs: 8
6/21/2007 7:10:27 AM|| 2502 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/21/2007 7:10:27 AM|| 5179 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
With Boinc 5.10.7 at 2667mhz:
6/21/2007 7:13:56 AM||Benchmark results:
6/21/2007 7:13:56 AM|| Number of CPUs: 8
6/21/2007 7:13:56 AM|| 2621 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/21/2007 7:13:56 AM|| 5738 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
new benches on the "fast" clover..quite a difference:
at 3157mhz:
On Boinc 5.8.16
5/14/2007 8:47:32 PM||Benchmark results:
5/14/2007 8:47:32 PM|| Number of CPUs: 8
5/14/2007 8:47:32 PM|| 2968 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/14/2007 8:47:32 PM|| 6184 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
----------------------------------------------------------------------
at 3157mhz with Boinc version 5.10.7:
6/21/2007 9:28:00 AM||Benchmark results:
6/21/2007 9:28:00 AM|| Number of CPUs: 8
6/21/2007 9:28:00 AM|| 3108 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/21/2007 9:28:00 AM|| 6921 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
looks like a rather good improvement
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
What's your's on your..ahh, the machine your running?
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
what do you think?What's your's on your..ahh, the machine your running?
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
I sort of know but couldn't resist harassing you!what do you think?
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
harassment seems to be the theme of the week. Which reminds me, I'll probably need to buy more aspirinI sort of know but couldn't resist harassing you!
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
yea, but when I harass you, your sure it's done with a smile.
Remember, I only tease people I like, the ones I don't like I ignore.
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
Trueyea, but when I harass you, your sure it's done with a smile.
Remember, I only tease people I like, the ones I don't like I ignore.
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
Latest.. new BOINC.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks