+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: AMD's 45nm Opterons Scheduled for 2008

  1. #1
    Xtreme News Addict Pinnacle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
    Posts
    2,241
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    AMD's 45nm Opterons Scheduled for 2008

    Shanghai is apparently more than just a cache-bump. AMD's documentation explicitly claims Shanghai will be the company's first 45nm processor. However, with a die shrink additional cache is one of the immediate architecture options as the smaller node allows for more transistors to fit on the chip die. Shanghai features 6MB of L3 cache.
    Shanghai will also use the Socket 1207 interface, suggesting existing motherboards will have the opportunity to upgrade to Shanghai processors -- AMD processors are typically designed to work with existing motherboards on same-socket interfaces with simple BIOS updates.
    http://www.dailytech.com/AMDs+45nm+O...rticle5984.htm

  2. #2
    Xtreme Cruncher [XC] Teroedni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    585
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Talking

    Sweet

  3. #3
    Xtreme Cruncher [XC] Teroedni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    585
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Arrow

    Quote Originally Posted by PallMall
    I wonder what intel will have by then , at this rate probably a cpu with 512mb L2 cache
    As far as i Know Yorkfield 45nm is coming in q3-q4 2007 and it has 12Mb cache .
    So i dont see Intel going from 12Mb to 512MB in Half a year

  4. #4
    Wanna look under my kilt? K404's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Glasgow-ish U.K.
    Posts
    4,466
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 41 Times in 25 Posts
    Pretty good to know Sooner than I expected, overall, but strange to see another City name?
    Quote Originally Posted by T_M View Post
    Not sure i totally follow anything you said, but regardless of that you helped me come up with a very good idea....
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    you sigged that?

    why?
    ______

    Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member Order's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Fairfield, Connecticut
    Posts
    496
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Better than Fallujah.

  6. #6
    YouTube Addict nn_step's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    18,438
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
    actually about three times that amount of L3
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  7. #7
    Wanna look under my kilt? K404's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Glasgow-ish U.K.
    Posts
    4,466
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 41 Times in 25 Posts
    18MB of L3 cache is a LOT nn... unless AMDs attitude towards L3 is different than towards L2, it doesnt seem to fit?

    Even with 45nm...thats a lot of space
    Quote Originally Posted by T_M View Post
    Not sure i totally follow anything you said, but regardless of that you helped me come up with a very good idea....
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    you sigged that?

    why?
    ______

    Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member Order's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Fairfield, Connecticut
    Posts
    496
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Will they be using that Rambus tech they licensed for this cache?

  9. #9
    YouTube Addict nn_step's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    18,438
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by K404
    18MB of L3 cache is a LOT nn... unless AMDs attitude towards L3 is different than towards L2, it doesnt seem to fit?

    Even with 45nm...thats a lot of space
    at the same time Z-Ram takes about 1/5 the die space as SRAM.
    Which means 18MB of Z-Ram would take about the same Die space as 3.6MB of SRAM. Which isn't remotely large for 45nm
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member Order's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Fairfield, Connecticut
    Posts
    496
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Oo I was right.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Enthusiast w0mbat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    over the rainbow
    Posts
    962
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 14 Times in 5 Posts
    Why are u talking about 18MB?
    AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1150/1350 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W

  12. #12
    YouTube Addict nn_step's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    18,438
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Order
    Oo I was right.
    Z-ram isn't Rambus it is Innovative Silicon Inc
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  13. #13
    Xtreme Member Order's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Fairfield, Connecticut
    Posts
    496
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Oo I was wrong, lol.

  14. #14
    Wanna look under my kilt? K404's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Glasgow-ish U.K.
    Posts
    4,466
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 41 Times in 25 Posts
    Fair point, I was pretty keen about Z-RAM when I first heard about it, but isnt it a plug-in onto the mobo? Has that changed? Hell...was it ever an add-in??

    I know it does the same thing, but if its external, I cant consider it the same as cache
    Quote Originally Posted by T_M View Post
    Not sure i totally follow anything you said, but regardless of that you helped me come up with a very good idea....
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    you sigged that?

    why?
    ______

    Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Enthusiast w0mbat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    over the rainbow
    Posts
    962
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 14 Times in 5 Posts
    And AMD has Z-RAM v2 already.
    AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1150/1350 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W

  16. #16
    YouTube Addict nn_step's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    18,438
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by K404
    Fair point, I was pretty keen about Z-RAM when I first heard about it, but isnt it a plug-in onto the mobo? Has that changed? Hell...was it ever an add-in??

    I know it does the same thing, but if its external, I cant consider it the same as cache
    what makes you think it can't be on-die?
    5-Mbits per square millimeter on 65nm isn't exactly something to sneeze at
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  17. #17
    Wanna look under my kilt? K404's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Glasgow-ish U.K.
    Posts
    4,466
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 41 Times in 25 Posts
    does that work out at 11.25mm^2? (just over 1 Sq cm) (for 18MB)(assuming all on-board)

    Nothing makes me think it can be on-die I was expecting a separate name if it can be on and off-die though.

    I`m not keeping up to date with news, theory and gossip, which is my fault.
    Quote Originally Posted by T_M View Post
    Not sure i totally follow anything you said, but regardless of that you helped me come up with a very good idea....
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    you sigged that?

    why?
    ______

    Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.

  18. #18
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Space
    Posts
    767
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by w0mbat
    And AMD has Z-RAM v2 already.
    only in licensing agreements.

    it is good news that they are saying products in 45nm are available Q2 but that could be ES samples.

    it does seem that AMD is slowly catching up with intel.

    On a different note, they are saying that the k-dialect is either not needed or not ready. make of that what you will.

  19. #19
    Xtreme Addict Helmore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by K404
    does that work out at 11.25mm^2? (just over 1 Sq cm) (for 18MB)(assuming all on-board)
    No it doesn't, in the first place 11.25mm^2=0.1125cm^2 which is not the same as "just over 1 Sq cm" and one other thing, your calculations aren't correct.
    18Mbyte works out to be 8 x 18 = 144Mbits
    This would mean that if they used Z-RAM, it would take up 144 / 5 = 28.8 mm^2 of die space, which is 0,288 Sq cm.

    But why are we talking about 18MB of L3 cache? No-one said Shanghai will feature that much of L3 cache.
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  20. #20
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,914
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Teroedni
    As far as i Know Yorkfield 45nm is coming in q3-q4 2007 and it has 12Mb cache .
    So i dont see Intel going from 12Mb to 512MB in Half a year
    The latest roadmaps show it 1Q08 now so it has slipped if they are true. If that is indeed the case then AMD will possibly make hay while the sun shines and Intel have lost a good opportunity to keep the Conroe momentum going.

    It would be nice to see K8L 5-20% faster than current Intel processors and released mid year to give everyone another choice ( either faster AMD or cheaper Intel ! ) . I definitely think 2H07/1Q08 will be the time to go quad core, still too early at the moment.

    Regards

    Andy

  21. #21
    Wanna look under my kilt? K404's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Glasgow-ish U.K.
    Posts
    4,466
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 41 Times in 25 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Helmore
    No it doesn't, in the first place 11.25mm^2=0.1125cm^2 which is not the same as "just over 1 Sq cm" and one other thing, your calculations aren't correct.
    18Mbyte works out to be 8 x 18 = 144Mbits
    This would mean that if they used Z-RAM, it would take up 144 / 5 = 28.8 mm^2 of die space, which is 0,288 Sq cm.
    yea...I was miles off with that one, must work on my unit conversions!
    Quote Originally Posted by T_M View Post
    Not sure i totally follow anything you said, but regardless of that you helped me come up with a very good idea....
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    you sigged that?

    why?
    ______

    Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts