OK, but I didn't see anywhere a comparison of sterling silver and pure silver.Originally Posted by BillA
OK, but I didn't see anywhere a comparison of sterling silver and pure silver.Originally Posted by BillA
*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*
GTZ --> MCW-NBMAX --> EK FC --> PA 120.3 --> PA 160.1 --> 2x DDC Ultras in Series --> Custom Clear Res
"Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity."
*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*
derive the thermal conductivity from the electrical
annealed Sterling is 80%, Coin is 84% (IACS electrical conductivity)
Originally Posted by DigzWhat part of my Question /Idea did i suggest i had a QuadCore with a Bow inOriginally Posted by Mr. Peanut
it. ?
I agree... the need for waterblocks that cool a large surface area is not going away any time soon as some have suggested.Originally Posted by Fr3ak
Even when Intel has a single die quad-core, it won't be long before they have a eight-core dual die CPU... and so on.
I assume that the IHS (Integrated Heat Spreader) also does some "heat spreading"... therefore a larger cooling patch (ideally as big as the IHS itself) is beneficial with any kind of CPU covered with an IHS.
I asked a similar question earlier in this thread, and as Helmore explained, there is reason to believe that Intel will move towards a HT-like architecture, and when that happens, dual die packages will no longer be a reasonable option.
http://xtremesystems.org/forums/show...&postcount=201
But yes, since removing the IHS on LGA chips isn't exactly a good option, a larger cooling patch is desirable.
Last edited by rjblanke; 01-15-2007 at 08:54 PM.
Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2 | Abit AB9 QuadGT | 2GB G.Skill HK | 8800GTS 640 | Ultra X3 1000W | Silverstone TJ-09 | Water
Athlon 64 3500 @ 2.5 | DFI "Expert" | 2GB G.Skill HZ | Radeon X1900XT | Enermax Liberty 500W | Lian Li V1000B | Thermalright XP-120
Pentium 4 2.4C @3.0 | Abit IC7-G Max II | 1GB Geil DDR400 | GeForce 6800nu | OCZ ModStream 450 | TT Tsunami | Zalman CNPS7000B-AlCu
HT will return.
Mutli-die packages will fade, return, fade, return, fade, return......
All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
I'm sorry, my mistake. I assumed that you did and that you were asking if bowing would help your temps.Originally Posted by Digz
All these Fuzion - Apogee GT threads are getting confusing
That's because we're all confused. There is a lot of shocking new information that we have to validate, play around with, etc.Originally Posted by Digz
Yes I have seen it
We Are Xtreme! Are You? ™
Free private ventrilo channels at vent6.gameservers.com port 4672.
I may have to build a special barb for this block to add jet function. What kind of thread does this have g1/4?
If i can get barbs in the correct thread and bore them out and if the barbs are brass under the chrome coating then I can definitely build a mini jet for it.
Any ideas on the size of the jets? I can do 1-3mm jets in a spread manner or continuous. Also any ideas on distance between jets and pins?
My pc: |||Abit AL8-V||| P4 631@4.6ghz||| 4x512 PDP pc2-4200@4-4-4-12 2.0v|||1x250gb WD 16mb sata||| 6600gt 500/1000@ 610/1240||| TDK dvd burner||| watercooled cpu and gpu and custom moded case.
Project Hard Lined
I was not going to respond to the first part of your statement. I was not alone that night. . .merely one of a few testers. If OPP had posted the results, you wouldn't be calling him arrogant? Or Vince? I doubt it. Please don't ruin my opinion of you but attacking me. Where are your results? It is after the 15th so there's no more NDA for you. Either you will validate our data or confuse the issue. I am very curious just to see how these blocks compare to blocks I have no access to like the Storm G5 and G7.Originally Posted by nikhsub1
I think both of the blocks are great blocks and could even be revised further to perform even better. I think either one has applications where it would have ideal performance.
Don't doubt it, OPP, Vince whoever would have received the same comments.Originally Posted by Philly_Boy
I'm not worried about opinions really, but I have not attacked you. I merely stated that I thought you calling your results 'definitive' is quite arrogant. My results (so far, much more to do) are below. Remember I dont have a quad core, just a 6700.Originally Posted by Philly_Boy
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=130318
OKOriginally Posted by Philly_Boy
*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*
GTZ --> MCW-NBMAX --> EK FC --> PA 120.3 --> PA 160.1 --> 2x DDC Ultras in Series --> Custom Clear Res
"Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity."
*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*
Were you stating "definitive" as in actaul numbers vs speculation because of the look of the design?Originally Posted by Philly_Boy
He, Philly, when we all finally get togehter, I could bring up my G5. I don't know if anyone else has one.
I also have a white water cascade.
Yes you are right, HyperThreading will return and it probably will in Nehalem. But rjblanke and I weren't referring to HyperThreading but to a HyperTransport like architecture from Intel (CSI), which we will most likely also get to see on Nehalem and it will also mean that it has an on-die memory controller. This on-die memory controller will make it very hard for Intel to make a dual-die-on-single-package CPU and that is why I think that dual-die CPUs are not the future. Yorkfield will probably be the last dual-die CPU we will get to see (in the "normal" consumer busines).Originally Posted by STEvil
"When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman
Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |
@Nikhsub
I seen what a difference adding a nozzle to the Fuzion made , my question now is, do you think it will make a difference if its done to the Apogee also?
I know the inlet isn't directly in the center, but I think it would be worth a shot!
"Do not ask to find fault, ask to learn. For if the ignorant man asks to learn, then he is more knowledgeable than a knowledgeable man, who asks to find fault." - Commander of the Faithful Imam Ali A.S.
I would doubt that it would much, the inlet isn't in the center of the block so a nozzle wouldn't be shooting the water on the "hot spot" but rather next to it. That would be my guess anyway.Originally Posted by hotrodtheman
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
Yes I meant definitive to mean that we had some data gathered from comparing the blocks under controlled situations. I am not trying to be arrogant, just trying to post the data we gathered.Originally Posted by phelan1777
Yeah, once I get back from Vegas, we will have to conduct some testing of our own. We'll be able to test with my new Intel set up as well as your AMD set up. . .that way between all the testing done we will have covered a variety of different CPU's and perhaps a performence envelope pattern will emerge.
Well the dual core be tested? Or did I accidentally skip that part?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
I say do both. And for the AMD do it with and without IHS if possible.Originally Posted by phelan1777
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
Hmmmmmm. . .wonder if I can trust my precious FX-60 to Phelan to remove the IHS. . .testing a naked FX would be tasty. . .Originally Posted by SparkyJJO
The storm should dominate that test, no doubt.Originally Posted by Philly_Boy
*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*
GTZ --> MCW-NBMAX --> EK FC --> PA 120.3 --> PA 160.1 --> 2x DDC Ultras in Series --> Custom Clear Res
"Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity."
*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*
Just do it yourself Have you ever removed an IHS before? The FX really isn't different, except in your mindOriginally Posted by Philly_Boy
Probably would, but that is the question. And if it does - I'm pretty certain it would - by how much does the fuzion lag?Originally Posted by nikhsub1
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
Bookmarks